Skip to main content

The uncertainty inequality in quantum holography, Bohr’s indeterminacy principle, and synchronized neural networks

  • Chapter
General Inequalities 6

Abstract

A rigorous proof of quantum parallelism cannot be based on the Heisenberg inequality because the standard deviation is insensitive to fine structures of the interference pattern generated by a Mach-Zehnder interferometer. Actually Niels Bohr’s indeterminacy principle cannot be based on any of the known uncertainty principles.

It is shown how the holographic transform allows to circumvent the difficulties with the standard deviation by using a group theoretical implementation of the canonical commutation relation of quantum electrodynamics. The geometric quantization approach makes the heuristic arguments concerning quantum parallelism rigorous by considering wave packets as symplectic spinors on the hologram plane. It includes the standard uncertainty inequality as a special case.

As an application to the area of quantum computers, we study synchronized neural networks and their photonic implementations as suggested by recent experiments in brain research. As another result of the geometric quantization approach to holography, the uncertainty minimizing Gabor wavelets arise which provide useful wavelet expansions for image analysis, segmentation, and compression.

Some ten years after writing his fundamental papers on optics, Hamilton made a startling observation: that the same formalism applies to mechanics of point particles. Replace the optical axis by the time. Then the transformation from initial position and momenta to final position and momenta is always symplectic. This discovery led to remarkable progress in the nineteenth century. In the 1920s — almost a century later — Hamilton’s analogy between optics and mechanics served as one of the major clues in the discovery of quantum mechanics.

Shlomo Sternberg (1988)

Great progress was possible thanks to the wonderful tool in atomic physics which is the laser.

Alain Aspect (1986)

The Schrödinger equation preserves the norm of the wave function and thus the number of particles. Now it is well known that in the presence of sources, photons can be absorbed or emitted. Thus one cannot introduce a Schrödinger equation for a single photon in the presence of sources. In fact, the electromagnetic field itself must be quantized, and photons then occur as elementary excitations of the quantized field.

Claude Cohen-Tannoudji (1989)

Each photon bears information about the entire system.

H. John Caulfield (1991)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R.J. Baron, M. Nuwer and K.H. Pribram, The holographic hypothesis of memory structure in brain function and perception. Contemporary Developments in Mathematical Psychology, Vol. II: Measurement, Psychophysics, and Neural Information Processing (R.C. Atkinson, D.H. Krantz, R.D. Luce, P. Suppes, Eds.), pp. 416–457. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  2. H.J. Caulfield, Optical neural networks. Real-Time Signal Processing for Industrial Applications, Critical Reviews of Optical Science and Technology (Bahram Javidi, Ed.), SPIE Vol. 960, pp. 242–252 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J.G. Daugman, Entropy reduction and decorrelation in visual coding by oriented neural receptive fields. IEEE Trans. Biomedical Eng. 36 (1989), 107–114.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Feinberg and K.R. MacDonald, Phase-conjugate mirrors and resonators with photorefractive materials. Photorefractive Materials and Their Applications II (P. Günther, J.-P. Huignard, Eds.), pp. 151–203. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, London, Paris, Tokyo, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  5. C.M. Gray and W. Singer, Stimulus-specific neuronal oscillations in orientation columns of cat visual cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86 (1989), 1698–1702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. E.L. Hahn, NMR and MRI in retrospect. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London A 333 (1990), 403–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. W. Heisenberg, Uber den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantenmechanischen Kinematik und Mechanik Z. Phys. 43 (1927), 172–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. W. Heisenberg, Physikalische Prinzipien der Quantentheorie. BI-Wissenschaftsverlag, Mannheim, Wien, Zürich, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Hilgevoord and J.B.M. Uffink, The mathematical expression of the uncertainty principle. Microphysical Reality and Quantum Formalism (A. van der Merwe, F. Selleri, G. Tarozzi, Eds.), pp. 91–114. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Hilgevoord and J.B.M. Uffink, A new view on the uncertainty principle. International School of History of Science, Second Course: Sixty-Two Years of Uncertainty: Historical, Philosophical and Physical Inquiries into the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Erice, Sicily, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J.P. Jones and L.A. Palmer, The two-dimensional spatial structure of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. J. Neurophys. 58 (1987), 1187–1211.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J.P. Jones and L.A. Palmer, An evaluation of the two-dimensional Gabor filter model of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. J. Neurophys. 58 (1987), 1233–1258.

    Google Scholar 

  13. B. Kostant, Symplectic spinors. Symposia Math., Vol. XIV, pp. 139–152. Academic Press, New York, London, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Y. Owechko, Nonlinear holographic associative memories. IEEE J. Quantum Electronics 25 (1989), 619–634.

    Google Scholar 

  15. K.H. Pribram, Languages of the Brain. 5th ed. Brandon House, New York, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  16. K.H. Pribram, Holography and brain function. Encyclopedia of Neuroscience, Vol. I (G. Adelman, Ed.), pp. 499–500. Birkhäuser, Basel, Boston, Stuttgart, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J.F. Price, Uncertainty principles and interference patterns. Proc. Centre for Mathematical Analysis, Australian National University, Vol. 9 (1985), 241–258.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Redhead, Incompleteness, Nonlocality, and Realism. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, New York, Toronto, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  19. H.P. Robertson, The uncertainty principle. Phys. Rev. 34 (1929), 163–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. W. Schempp, Harmonic Analysis on the Heisenberg Nilpotent Lie Group, with Applications to Signal Theory. Pitman Research Notes in Math., Vol. 147. Longman Scientific and Technical, Harlow, Essex, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  21. W. Schempp, Holographic fractals. Signal Theory and Image Processing (W. Schempp, D.C. Struppa, Eds.). Mediterranean Press, 1992. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  22. W. Singer, Search for coherence: A basic principle of cortical self-organization. Concepts in Neuroscience 1 (1990), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  23. B.H. Soffer, G.J. Dunning, Y. Owechko and E. Maroni, Associative holographic memory with feedback using phase-conjugate mirros. Opt. Lett. 11 (1986), 118–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. B.H. Soffer, Y. Owechko and G.J. Dunning, A photorefractive optical neural network. Optics in Complex Systems (F. Lanzl, H.-J. Preuss, G. Weigelt, Eds.). Proc. SPIE 1319 (1990), 196–197.

    Google Scholar 

  25. U.P. Wild, Spectral hole-burning: Applications to data storage and processing — the molecular computer. Gordon Research Conference on Holography and Optical Information Processing, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Basel AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Han-lin, C., Schempp, W. (1992). The uncertainty inequality in quantum holography, Bohr’s indeterminacy principle, and synchronized neural networks. In: Walter, W. (eds) General Inequalities 6. International Series of Numerical Mathematics / Internationale Schriftenreihe zur Numerischen Mathematik / Série Internationale d’Analyse Numérique, vol 103. Birkhäuser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-7565-3_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-7565-3_32

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Basel

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-0348-7567-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-0348-7565-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics