Advertisement

Computer automation in measurement and analysis of cell motility in vitro

  • G. Thurston
  • I. Spadinger
  • B. Palcic
Chapter
Part of the Experientia Supplementum book series (EXS, volume 59)

Summary

The application of computerized techniques to the study of cell motility has allowed direct examination and quantitation of individual cell movement and morphology. This has stimulated interest in theoretical models of cell motility, and has prompted the need for increasingly sophisticated approaches to analyze and present cell motility data. In this article we review some of the microscope systems currently used to study cell motility, and give more details on such a system developed in our own laboratory, the DMIPS Cell Analyzer. Brief examples of its application to the field of cell motility are provided. Some areas of further research in the field of automated microscopy are also discussed.

Keywords

Digital Signal Processor Motile Cell Chain Code Cell Speed Indirect Assay 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abercrombie, M. (1978) The crawling of metazoan cells. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B207: 129–147.Google Scholar
  2. Albrecht-Buehler, G. (1977) The phagokinetic tracks of 3T3 cells. Cell 11: 395–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell, E., Levinstone, D., Sher, S., Marek, L., Merrill, C., Young, I., and Eden, M. (1979) An interactive computer system for the analysis of cell lineages. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 27: 458–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berns, G. S., and Berns, M. W. (1982) Computer-based tracking of living cells. Exp. Cell Res. 142: 103–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boreiko, C., Mondal, S., Narayan, S., and Heidelberger, C. (1980) Effect of 12-0-Tetrade- canoylphorbol-13-acetate on the morphology and growth of C3H/10T1/2 Mouse Embryo Cells. Cancer Res. 40: 4709–4716.Google Scholar
  6. Box, G. E. P., and Jenkins, G. M. (1976) Time series analysis, forecasting and control. Holden-Day, Oakland.Google Scholar
  7. Boyarski, A. (1975), A Markov chain model for human granulocyte movement. J. Math. Biol. 2: 69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boyarski, A., and Noble, P. B. (1977) A Markov chain characterization of neutrophil locomotion under control and chemotactic conditions. Can. J. Physiol. Pharamcol. 55: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boyden, S. V. (1962) The chemotactic effect of mixtures of antibody and antigen on polymorphonuclear leukocytes. J. Exp. Med. 115: 453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, A. F., Middleton, C. A., Dunn, G. A., and Vasiliew, J. M. (1989) A quantitative analysis of alterations in the shape of cultured fibroblasts induced by tumour-promoting phorbolester. Cell Biol. Int. Rep. 13: 357–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Castagna, M. (1987) Phorbol esters as signal transducers and tumor promoters. Biol. Cell 59: 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cibert, C., Skalli, A., and Schoevaert, D. (1988) Statistical analysis of morphometrically analyzed outlines of cells in culture. Anal. Quant. Cytology Histol. 10: 329–338.Google Scholar
  13. Comandon, J. (1917) Phagocytose in vitro des hematozoaires du calfat (enregistrement cinematographique). C. Rend. Soc. Biol. 80: 314.Google Scholar
  14. Cutler, J. E. (1974) A simple in vitro method for studies on Chemotaxis. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 147: 471–474.Google Scholar
  15. Dahlgren, C. (1979) Modulation of poylmorphonuclear leukocyte locomotion in vitro. Linkoping University Medical Dissertations, No. 66.Google Scholar
  16. Damji, K., Palcic, B., Rootman, J., and Thurston, G. (1990), Pharmacological modulation of human subconjunctival fibroblast behaviour in vitro. Opthal. Surg. 21: 31–43.Google Scholar
  17. Dill, A. R., Levine, M. D., and Noble, P. B. (1987) Multiple resolution skeletons. IEEE Transact. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intel. 9: 495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dunn, G. A. (1980) Mechanisms of fibroblast locomotion, in: Cell Adhesion and Motility, pp. 409–423. Eds A. S. G. Curtis and J. D. Pitts. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  19. Dunn, G. A. (1982) Chemotaxis as a form of directed cell behavior: some theoretical considerations in: Biology of the chemotactic response, pp. 4–26. Eds J. M. Lackie and P. C. Wilkinson. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  20. Dunn, G. A., and Brown A. F. (1987) A unified approach to analysing cell motility. J. Cell Sci. Suppl. 8: 81–102.Google Scholar
  21. Fibach, E., Yamasaki, H., Weinstein, I. B., Marks, P. A., and Rifkind, R. A. (1978) Heterogeneity of murine erythroleukemia cells with respect to tumor promoter-mediated inhibition of cell differentiation. Cancer Res. 38: 3685–3688.Google Scholar
  22. Gail, M. H., and Boone, C. W. (1970) The locomotion of mouse fibroblasts in tissue culture. Biophys. J. 10: 980–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gaino, E., Zunino, L., Burlando, B., and Sara, M. (1985) The locomotion of dissociated sponge cells: a cell-by-cell time-lapse film analysis. Cell Motil. 5: 463–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grinnel, F. (1982) Migration of human neutrophils in hydrated collagen lattices. J. Cell Sci. 58: 95–108.Google Scholar
  25. Hock, R. S., Sanger, J. M., and Sanger, J. W. (1989) Talin dynamics in living microinjected nonmuscle cells. Cell Motil. Cytoskel. 14: 271–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ingber D. E., and Folkman, J. (1989) Tension and compression as basic determinants of cell form and function: utilization of a cellular tensegrity mechanism, in: Cell Shape: Determinants, Regulation and Regulatory Role, pp. 3–31. Eds W. D. Stein and F. Bronner. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  27. Jaggi, B., and Palcic, B. (1985) The design and development of an optical scanner for cell biology. IEEE 7th Eng. Med. Biol. 2: 890–985.Google Scholar
  28. Jaggi, B., Poon, S. S. S., and Palcic, B. (1986) Implementation and evaluation of the DMIPS Cell Analyzer. IEEE 8th Eng. Med. Biol. 1: 906–911.Google Scholar
  29. Lackie, J. M., and Burns, M. D. (1983) Leukocyte locomotion: comparison of random and directed paths using a modified time-lapse film analysis. J. Immunol. Methods. 62: 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lanni, F., Waggoner, A. S., and Taylor, D. L. (1985), Structural organization of interphase 3T3 fibroblasts studied by total inertial reflection fluorescence microscopy. J. Cell Biol. 100: 1091–1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lewandowska, K., Doroszewski, J., Haemmerli, G., and Strauli, P. (1979) An attempt to analyze locomotion of leukemia cells by computer image processing. Comput. Biol. Med. 9: 331–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. MacAulay, C., and Palcic, B. (1990) Fractal texture features based on optical density surface area; Use in image analysis of cervical cells. Analyt. Quant. Cytol. Histol. in press.Google Scholar
  33. Marks, P. W., and Maxfield, F. R. (1990) Transient increases in cytosolic free calcium appear to be required for the migration of adherent human neutrophils. J. Cell Biol. 110: 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Meyer, F. (1979) Iteractive image transformations for an automatic screening of cervical smears. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 27: 128–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Middleton, C. A., and Sharp, J. A. (1984) Cell Locomotion in vitro. University of Cahfornia Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  36. Noble, P. B., and Levine, M. D. (1986) Computer-assisted Analyses of Cell Locomotion and Chemotaxis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.Google Scholar
  37. Noble, P. D., and Shields, E. D. (1989) Time-based changes in fibroblast three-dimensional locomotory characteristics and phenotypes. Expl. Cel Biol. 57: 238–245.Google Scholar
  38. O’Neill, C., Riddle, P., and Rozengurt, E. (1985) Stimulating the proliferation of quiescent 3T3 fibroblasts by peptide growth factors or by agents which elevate cellular cyclic AMP level has opposite effects on motility. Exp. Cell Res. 56: 363–368.Google Scholar
  39. Ohnishi, R. (1981) Dynamics of cultured L cells as studied by cinemicroscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Biomed. Res. 2, suppl.: 1–12.Google Scholar
  40. Oster, G. F. (1984) On the crawling of cells. J. Embryol. Exp. Morpho. 83, suppl.: 329–364.Google Scholar
  41. Oster, G. F. (1989) Cell motihty and tissue morphogenesis, in: Cell Shape: Determinants, Regulation and Regulatory Role, pp. 33–61. Eds W. D. Stein and F. Bronner. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  42. Palcic, B., Jaggi, B. W., and Nordin, J. A. (1987) Dynamic Microscope Image Processing Scanner (DMIPS). United States Patent, 4700298.Google Scholar
  43. Palcic, B., and Jaggi, B. (1990) Image cytometry system for morphometric measurements of live cells, in: Bioinstrumentation: Developments and Applications, pp. 923–991. Ed. D. L. Wise, Butterworth Publishers, Stoneham, MA.Google Scholar
  44. Palcic, B., Poon, S. S. S., Thurston, G., and Jaggi, B. (1988), Time lapse records of cells in vitro using optical memory disk and Cell Analyzer. J. Tiss. Cuh. Meth. 11(1): 19–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Riddle, P. N. (1979) Time Lapse Cinemicroscopy. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  46. Schor, S. L. (1980) Cell proHferation and migration on collagen substrata in vitro. J. Cell Sci. 41: 159–175.Google Scholar
  47. Segall, J. E. (1988) Quantitation of motility and area changes of dictyostelium discoideum amoebae in response to chemoattractants. J. Muscle Res. Cell. Motil. 9: 481–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shiba, Y., Sastrodihardjo, S., Sasaki, Y., and Kanno, Y. (1987) Cell Struct. Func. 12: 549–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shiba, Y., Sasaki, Y., and Kanno, Y. (1988) 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate disrupts actin filaments and focal contacts and enhances binding of fibronectin-coated latex beads to 3T3-L1 cells. Exptl. Cell Res. 178: 233–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Singer, S. J., and Kupfer, A. (1986) The directed migration of eukaryotic cells. Ann. Rev. Cell Biol. 2: 337–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Soil, D. R. (1988) “DMS”, a computer-assisted system for quantitating motility, the dynamics of cytoplasmic flow, and pseudopod formation: its application to dictyostelium Chemotaxis. Cell. Motil. Cytoskel. 10: 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Straulic, P., and Haemmerii, G. (1984) The role of cancer cell motility in invasion. Cancer Met. Rev. 3: 127–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Thurston, G., and Palcic, B. (1986) Cell motility and the cell cycle. J. Cell Biol. 103 (5, pt. 2) 510.Google Scholar
  54. Thurston, G., Jaggi, B., and Palcic, B. (1986) Cell motility studies with an automated microscope system. Exp. Cell Res. 165: 380–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Thurston, G., and Palcic, B. (1987), Studies on the role of cell motility in growth control using an automated microscope system. J. Cell Biochem. Suppl. lib: 168.Google Scholar
  56. Thurston, G., Jaggi, B., and Palcic, B. (1988) Cell motility studies with an automated microscope system. II. Measurement of cell morphology. Cytometry 9: 411–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tranquillo, R. T., and Lauffenburger, D. A. (1987a) Stochastic model of leukocyte chemosen- sory movement. J. Math. Biol. 25: 229–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tranquillo, R. T., and Lauffenburger, D. A. (1987b) Analysis of leukocytes chemosensory movement. Adv. Biosci. 66: 29–38.Google Scholar
  59. Verschueren, H., Dekegel, D., and DeBaetseher, P. (1988) Difference in motile behavior between lymphoma variants with different invasive and metastatic capabilities. Invas. Metas., 8: 31–44.Google Scholar
  60. Vershueren, H., and Van Larebeke, N. (1984) A new model for the quantitative analysis of cell movement in vitro: definition of a shape change factor. Cytometry 5: 557–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wang, Y.-L. (1984) Reorganization of actin filament bundles in living fibroblasts. J. Cell Biol. 99: 1478–1485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wang, Y.-L. (1985) Exchange of actin subunits at the leading edge of hving fibroblasts: Possible role of treadmilling. J. Cell Biol. 101: 597–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wilkinson, P. C., Lackie, J. M., and Allan, R. B. (1982). Methods for Measuring Leukocyte Locomotion, in: Cell Analysis, vol. 1, Ed. N. Catsinpoolas. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  64. Wood, S., Baker, R. R., and Marzocchi, B. (1967) Factors influencing the spread of cancer: locomotion of normal and malignant cells in vivo, in: Endogenous Factors Influencing Host-tumour Balance, pp. 223–237. Eds R. W. Wissler, T. L. Dao and S. Wood. U. Chicago Press, Chicago ILL.Google Scholar
  65. Zetter, B. R. (1980) Migration of capillary endothelial cells is stimulated by tumor-derived factors. Nature (London) 285: 41–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag Basel/Switzerland 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Thurston
    • 1
  • I. Spadinger
    • 2
  • B. Palcic
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of OphthalmologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  2. 2.Cancer Imaging, Physics DivisionB.C. Cancer AgencyVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations