Skip to main content

Methods to Assess the Processing of Speech Sounds by Animals

  • Chapter
Methods in Comparative Psychoacoustics

Part of the book series: BioMethods ((BIOMETHODS))

Abstract

Here are described some procedures designed to assess the capacities of animals to detect, discriminate, and identify human speech sounds. All procedures use a go/no-go response, which is taught to animals using operant conditioning techniques based on positive (food) reinforcement. All procedures are easily learned by animals, and allow for direct comparisons with human subjects, who can be tested with the same methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Suggested Reading

  • Dooling, R. & Brown, S. (1990). Speech perception by budgerigars: The voiced-voicless distinction. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 65–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dooling, R., Okanoya, K. & Brown, S. (1989). Speech perception by budgerigars: Spoken vowels. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 568–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hienz, R. & Brady, J. (1988). The acquisition of vowel discrimination by non-human primates. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84, 186–194.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kluender, K. (1991). Effects of first formant onset properties on voicing judgments result from processes not specific to humans. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 59, 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluender, K., Diehl, R. & Killeen, P. (1987). Japanese quail can learn phonetic categories. Science, 237, 1195–1197.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kojima, S. & Kiritani, S. (1989). Vocal-auditory functions in the chimpanzee: Vowel perception. International Journal of Primatology, 10, 199–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, P. (1986). Theoretical contributions of tests on animals to the special mechanisms debate in speech. Experimental Biology, 45, 233–265.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, P. (1991). Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 93–107.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sinnott, J. (1989). Detection and discrimination of synthetic English vowels by Old World monkeys and humans. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 86, 557–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sinnott, J. & Adams, F. (1987). Differences in human and monkey sensitivity to acoustic cues underlying voicing contrasts. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 82, 1539–47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sinnott, J. & Kreiter, N. (1991). Differential sensitivity to vowel continua in Old World monkeys and humans. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 2421–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

References

  • Miller, J. M. & Liberman, A. (1979). Some effects of later-occurring information on the perception of stop consonant and semi-vowel. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 457–465.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sinnott, J. & Brown, C. (1992). Detection and discrimination of synthetic English vowels by Mongolian gerbils, African monkeys, and humans. Abstracts of the 15th Midwinter Research Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, p.26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinnott, J. & Barnett, D. (1992). Comparison of human and monkey sensitivity to the English liquid /ra-la/ contrast. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, pt. 2, 2340–41 (abstract only).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, W. (1970). Studies of hearing and hearing loss in the monkeys. In W. Stebbins (Ed.), Animal Psychophysics: The Design and Conduct of Sensory Experiments, (pp. 41–66). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Strange, W. & Dittman, S. (1984). Effects of discrimination training on the perception of/r-1/ by Japanese adults learning English. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 131–145.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swets, J. (1964). Signal detection and recognition by human observers. Wiley, NY.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Basel AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sinnott, J.M. (1995). Methods to Assess the Processing of Speech Sounds by Animals. In: Klump, G.M., Dooling, R.J., Fay, R.R., Stebbins, W.C. (eds) Methods in Comparative Psychoacoustics. BioMethods. Birkhäuser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-7463-2_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-7463-2_24

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Basel

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-0348-7465-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-0348-7463-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics