Abstract
Here are described some procedures designed to assess the capacities of animals to detect, discriminate, and identify human speech sounds. All procedures use a go/no-go response, which is taught to animals using operant conditioning techniques based on positive (food) reinforcement. All procedures are easily learned by animals, and allow for direct comparisons with human subjects, who can be tested with the same methods.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Suggested Reading
Dooling, R. & Brown, S. (1990). Speech perception by budgerigars: The voiced-voicless distinction. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 65–71.
Dooling, R., Okanoya, K. & Brown, S. (1989). Speech perception by budgerigars: Spoken vowels. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 568–574.
Hienz, R. & Brady, J. (1988). The acquisition of vowel discrimination by non-human primates. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84, 186–194.
Kluender, K. (1991). Effects of first formant onset properties on voicing judgments result from processes not specific to humans. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 59, 83–96.
Kluender, K., Diehl, R. & Killeen, P. (1987). Japanese quail can learn phonetic categories. Science, 237, 1195–1197.
Kojima, S. & Kiritani, S. (1989). Vocal-auditory functions in the chimpanzee: Vowel perception. International Journal of Primatology, 10, 199–213.
Kuhl, P. (1986). Theoretical contributions of tests on animals to the special mechanisms debate in speech. Experimental Biology, 45, 233–265.
Kuhl, P. (1991). Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 93–107.
Sinnott, J. (1989). Detection and discrimination of synthetic English vowels by Old World monkeys and humans. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 86, 557–65.
Sinnott, J. & Adams, F. (1987). Differences in human and monkey sensitivity to acoustic cues underlying voicing contrasts. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 82, 1539–47.
Sinnott, J. & Kreiter, N. (1991). Differential sensitivity to vowel continua in Old World monkeys and humans. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 2421–29.
References
Miller, J. M. & Liberman, A. (1979). Some effects of later-occurring information on the perception of stop consonant and semi-vowel. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 457–465.
Sinnott, J. & Brown, C. (1992). Detection and discrimination of synthetic English vowels by Mongolian gerbils, African monkeys, and humans. Abstracts of the 15th Midwinter Research Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, p.26.
Sinnott, J. & Barnett, D. (1992). Comparison of human and monkey sensitivity to the English liquid /ra-la/ contrast. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, pt. 2, 2340–41 (abstract only).
Stebbins, W. (1970). Studies of hearing and hearing loss in the monkeys. In W. Stebbins (Ed.), Animal Psychophysics: The Design and Conduct of Sensory Experiments, (pp. 41–66). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Strange, W. & Dittman, S. (1984). Effects of discrimination training on the perception of/r-1/ by Japanese adults learning English. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 131–145.
Swets, J. (1964). Signal detection and recognition by human observers. Wiley, NY.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Basel AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sinnott, J.M. (1995). Methods to Assess the Processing of Speech Sounds by Animals. In: Klump, G.M., Dooling, R.J., Fay, R.R., Stebbins, W.C. (eds) Methods in Comparative Psychoacoustics. BioMethods. Birkhäuser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-7463-2_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-7463-2_24
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Basel
Print ISBN: 978-3-0348-7465-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-0348-7463-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive