Advertisement

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to determine more nearly computable error bounds for finite element solutions to two-dimensional elliptic boundary value problems defined on simply connected polygonal regions. In the appropriate norm, the interpolation remainder is an upper bound on the finite element remainder. This follows from a best approximation property of finite element solution (Section 2). The SARD kernel theorems [7] provide representations of admissible linear functionals defined on function spaces of prescribed smoothness. These theorems are defined for rectangles and in Section 4 are extended to triangles. The method can be extended to more general regions [1]. In this paper we calculate the constants in interpolation error bounds for triangles. This is done in Section 5 for the particular case of piecewise linear interpolation. Finally in Section 6 the results of Section 5 are applied to a specific boundary value problem in order to obtain numerical results.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Barnhill, R. E., and J. A. Gregory: Sard kernel theorems on triangular and rectangular domains with extensions and applications to finite element error bounds. TR/11, Department of Mathematics, Brunei University, 1972.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barnhill, R. E., J. A. Gregory and J. R. Whiteman: The extension and application of Sard kernel theorems to compute finite element error bounds. Proc. of O. N. R. Regional Symposium “Mathematical foundations of the finite element method with applications to partial differential equations”, Univ. of Maryland, Baltimore County, June 1972.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barnhill, R. E. and J. R. Whiteman: Error analysis of finite element methods with triangles for elliptic boundary value problems. In Whiteman (ed.), The Mathematics of Finite Elements and Applications. Acad. Press, London 1973.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barnhill, R. E. and J. R. Whiteman: Singularities due to re-entrant boundaries in elliptic problems. Proc. of Symposium “Numerische Methoden bei Differentialgleichungen”. Math. Forschungsinstitut, Oberwolfach, June 1972.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Birkhoff, G., M. H. Schultz and R.S. Varga: Piecewise Hermite interpolation in one and two variables with applications to partial differential equations. Numer. Math. 11 (1968), 232–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bramble, J. H. and M. Zlamal: Triangular elements in the finite element method. Math. Comp. 24 (1970), 809–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sard, A.: Linear Approximation. Mathem. Survey 9, Americ. Math. Society, Providence, R. I., 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Smirnov, V. I.: A Course of Higher Mathematics. Vol. V. Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1964.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Varga, R. S.: The role of interpolation and approximation theory in variational and projectional methods for solving partial differential equations. IFIP Congr. 71 (1971), 14–19, North Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zenisek, A.: Interpolation polynomials on the triangle. Numer. Math. 15 (1970), 283–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zlamal, M.: On the finite element method. Numer. Math. 12 (1968), 394–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Basel AG 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. E. Barnhill
    • 1
  • J. R. Whiteman
    • 2
  1. 1.Salt Lake CityUSA
  2. 2.UxbridgeUK

Personalised recommendations