Skip to main content

Abstract

The question of involvement is critical to human functioning. The degree to which people commit their attention, interest, and labor determines the ultimate success of the venture at hand. Western culture has assumed, through institutions such as the work ethic, that degree of involvement will determine the nature and degree of success: “The harder we work, the more involved we have to be, and the greater our rewards will be.” Stemming from this reasoning, we have expected students to become involved in their studies from the day they enter nursery school to the day of college graduation. Noninvolvement on the other hand, has been interpreted as symptomatic of laziness, weakness of spirit, ineptness of mind, or inferiority of breeding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Cheffers, J.T. F., Amidon, E.J., Rogers, K.D.: Interaction Analysis: An Application to Nonverbal Activity. Minneapolis 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheffers, J.T.F., Lowe, B., Harrold, R.: Sports Spectator Behavior Assessment by Technique of Behavior Analysis. International Journal of Sports Psychology 7, No 1 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keele, S.: Attention & Human Performance. Palisades 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pendelton, R.F.: Maturity of Object Relations and the Process of Attention. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston University, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricks, N. L.: Sustained Attention and the Effects of Distraction in Underachieving Second Grade Children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston University, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whorf, B., in: Keele, S.: Attention & Human Performance. Palisades 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M., Elliot, M., Laberge, J.: Play With a Purpose. New York 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bany, M.A., Johnson, L. V.: Classroom Group Behavior. New York 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheffers, J.T.F.: The Validation of an Instrument Designed to Expand the Flanders System of Interaction Analysis to Describe Nonverbal Interaction, Different Varieties of Teacher Behavior and Pupil Response. Doctoral dissertation, Temple University, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheffers, J. T. F., Mancini, V.H., Zaichkowsky, L.D.: The Development of an Elementary Physical Education Attitude Scale. The Physical Educator, March 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, L.: Research on Open Education: Problems and Issues. In: D.D. Hearn, J. Burdin and L. Katz: Current Research and Perspectives in Open Education. Washington, D.C., 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lydon, M.C.: Decision-Making in Elementary School-Age Children: Effects of a Convergent Curriculum Model Upon Motor Skill Development, Self-Concept, and Group Interaction. Doctoral dissertation, Boston University, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mancini, V.H., Cherters, J.T.F., Zaichkowsky, L.D.: Decision-Making in Elementary Children: Effects on Attitudes and Interaction. The Research Quarterly 47, No. 1 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A., Cherters, J.T.F., Whitcomb, V.: Physical Education: Teaching Human Movement in the Elementary Schools. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosston, M.: Teaching Physical Education. Columbus, Ohio, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutting, W.C.: Designing Classroom Spontaneity. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, M.D., Greenlaw, P.S.: Management: Decisions and Behavior. Homewood, Ill., 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taba, H.: Curriculum Development: Theory and Practice. New York, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tainiter, M.: The Art and Science of Decision-Making. New York 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walberg, H.J., Thomas, S.C.: Open Education: An Operational Definition and Validation in Great Britain and the United States. American Educational Research Journal 9, 197–207 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheffers, J.: Systematic observation in teaching. Paper prepared for delivery at the AIESEP International Conference ‘Towards a science of teaching’, 26–30 June 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dropkin, S., Taylor, M.: Perceived Problems of Beginning Teachers and Related Factors. The Journal of Teacher Education 14, 384–390 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, J.C.: The Critical Incident Technique. Psychological Bulletin 51 /4, 327–358 (1954).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R.: The conditions of learning. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, J.: Physical education in secondary schools. Schools council research studies. Hazel Watson & Winey Ltd., Aylesbury 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfqvist, G.: Arbets- och utbildningskrav för ämneslärarkandidater. What demands are made on the subject teacher in the school situation, and how should these demands influence the preservice training program? Pedagogisk-psykologiska problem, Malmö, Sweden: School of Education, No. 156 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nupponen, H.: Plan for a programme of research on school physical education in Finland in 1975–1979. Reports of Physical Culture and Health 14 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Olander, H., Farrel, M.: Professional problems of elementary teachers. The Journal of Teacher Education 21/2, 276–280 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piéron, M.: Evaluation of student-teachers during professional training. FIEP Bulletin 47/3, 32–38 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitkänen, P.: Liikunnanopettajan nykyinen ja uudentuva toimenkuva. Department of Physical Education. University of Jyväskylä, S.C., No.5, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roundy, E.: Problems of and competencies needed by men physical education teachers of the secondary level. Research Quarterly 38, 274–282 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Telama, R.: Pupils’ interest and motivation for sport in Finland. In: Research Institute of Physical Culture and Health, Yearbook 77. Reports of Physical Culture and Health 20, 26–49 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiainen, J.: Increasing physical education students’ creative thinking. Studies in Sport, Physical Education and Health 7. University of Jyväskylä, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R.: Teaching as problem-solving behaviour. Biddle-Ellena, p. 102–126 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Varstala, V.: Occupational analysis of the field of physical education with special reference to the P.E. teaching. Paper presented to the International Congress of AIESEP, Madrid, 26–30 June 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wey, H.: Difficulties of beginning teachers. The School Review 59/1, 32–37 (1951).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, W.G.: Teacher behavior in physical education classes. Part I: Development of a descriptive system. Unpublished paper, Department of Physical Education, Teachers College, Columbia University, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrette, G.T.: A descriptive analysis of teacher behavior in physical education classes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, W.G., Fishman, S.E.: Developing a system for describing teaching. Questions 15, 9–16(1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, S.E.: A procedure for recording augmented feedback in physical education classes. Ed. D., Columbia University, New York 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, W.M.: A study of feedback diversity in teaching physical education. Ph.D., University of Wisconsin, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughley, C: Modification of teaching behaviors in physical education. Ph.D., Ohio State University, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewett, A.E., et al.: Educational change through a taxonomy for writing physical education objectives. Questions 15, 32–38(1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, G. W.: Utilizing interaction analysis to specify interaction between pupils and teachers in conceptual approach physical education. In: Piéron, M. (ed.): Towards a science of teaching physical education: teaching analysis, p. 44–52. AIESEP, Liège 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piéron, M., Drion, C.: Analyse de l’interaction entre le professeur et ses élèves en éducation physique, par le système de Hough. Rev. Educ. Phys. 17, 27–37 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rife, F.N.: Modification of student-teacher behavior and its effects upon pupil behavior. Ph.D., Ohio State University, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobey, C.: A descriptive analysis of the occurrence of augmented feedback in physical education classes. Ed.D., Columbia University New York 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turcotte, C.: La fiabilité des systèmes d’analyse de l’enseignement. In: Dussault, G., et al.: L’analyse de l’enseignement, p. 189–230. Presses Université Québec, Montréal 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, J.E.: Physical Education in Secondary Schools. Macmillan, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J.E., Good, T.L.: Die Lehrer-Schüler-Interaktion. München 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, M., Dobrick, M.: Die Rolle der Fremdattribuierung von Ursachen in der Handlungssteuerung bei Lehrern. In: Görlitz, D., Meyer, W.U., Weiner, B. (Hrsg.): Attribution. Stuttgart 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, M.: Entwurf einer Heuristik für eine theoretisch geleitete Lehrer- und Erzieherbildung. In: Bericht aus dem Psychologischen Institut der Universität Heidelberg. Heidelberg, November 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W.: Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. In: Psychological Review 80/4, 252–283 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W., Ebbesen, E.B., Zeiss, A.R.: Selective attention to the self: Situational and dispositional determinants. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 27, 129–142(1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B.: An introduction to social learning theory. In: Rotter, J.B., Chance, D.E., Phares, E.J. (Hrsg.): Applications of a social learning theory of personality, S. 1–42. New York 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J. W., Kelley, H.H.: The social psychology of groups. New York 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, A.C., Uttendorfer-Marek I., Weidle, R.: Die Analyse von Unterrichtsstrategien mit der Methode des (Nachträglichen Lauten Denkens) von Lehrern und Schülern zu ihrem unterrichtlichen Handeln. In: Unterrichtswissenschaft 5/3, 244–250 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B.: Attributionstheoretische Analyse von Erwartung — Nutzen — Theorien. In: Schmalt, H.D., Meyer, W.U. (Hrsg.): Leistungsmotivation und Verhalten, S. 81–100. Stuttgart 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amidon, E., Hough, J.B.: Interaction via the Hough System of Analysis (4). Interaction Analysis: Theory, Research and Application. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain, L.: An Instrument for Identifying Implicit Values in Physical Education Programs. Research Quarterly 47, 307–315 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain, L.: Differences in Values Implicit in Teaching and Coaching Behaviors. Research Quarterly 49/1, 6–11 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunelle, J.: Utilisation du système de Joyce dans la formation des stagiaires (éducation physique). In: Dussault, G., et al.: L’analyse de l’enseignement, p. 261–280. Presses de l’Université du Quebec, Montreal 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheffers, J.: Systematic Observation in Teaching. A Paper read at AIESEP Conference. Towards a Science of Teaching, Madrid, June 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielson, R.R., Zelhart, P. F., Jr., Dake, C.J.: Multidimensional Scaling and Factor Analysis of Coaching Behavior as Percieved by High School Hockey Players. Research Quarterly 46/3 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinilä, L.: Analysing Systems in the Evaluation of the Teacher-Pupil Interaction Process in Physical Education Classes. FIEP Bulletin 47/1 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendry, L.B.: The Coaching Stereotype. In: Readings in Sport Psychology (H.T.A. Whiting). Bait Publishers, Lafayette, Ind., 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hupe, A.: The Development of a System for Coding Teaching Behavior in Physical Education. Ed.D., Columbia 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasson, P.L.: Teaching and Coaching Behaviors of University Physical Educators. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, L.O.: A Study of Communication in the Role Relationships Between Coaches and Athletes. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Denver, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, G.: Utilizing Interaction Analysis to Specify Interaction Between Pupils and Teachers in Conceptual Approach Physical Education. A Paper read at AIESEP Conference. Towards a Science of Teaching, Madrid, June 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, G.: Investigation of Observational and Interactive Behaviors of Student Teacher Consultants in Physical Education. Oregon Journal for Health, Physical Education and Recreation 12/3, 19–22(1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nygaard, G.: An Analysis of Verbal Interaction in Physical Education Classes. Ed.D., University of Oregon, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogilvie, B., Tutko, T. A.: Problem Athletes and How to Handle Them. Pelham Books, London 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piéron, M.: Etude de la relation — élèves en éducation physique par le système de Hough. Communication au congrès international de pédagogie du sport, Karlsruhe 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rushall, B.S.: Two Observational Schedules for Sporting and Physical Education Environments. Canadian Journal of Applied Sports Sciences 2 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, A., Boyer, G.: Mirrors for Behavior, Classroom Interaction, vols. I–XIV. Research for Better Schools, Philadelphia 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telama, R.: The Meaning of Evaluation in the Development of Learning and Teaching. A Paper read at AIESEP Conference. Towards a Science of Teaching, Madrid, June 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tharp, R., Gallimore, R.G.: What a Coach Can Teach a Teacher. Psychology Today, January 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeigler, E.F.: A Brief Analysis of the Ordinary Language Employed in the Professional Preparation of Sport Coaches and Teachers. A paper read at the Pre-Conference of the Canadian Association for H.P.E. and R., Ottawa 1974.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Guido Schilling Walter Baur

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 Springer Basel AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cheffers, J.T.F. et al. (1980). Seminar Unterrichtsanalyse. In: Schilling, G., Baur, W. (eds) Audiovisuelle Medien im Sport / Moyens audiovisuels dans le sport / Audiovisual means in sports. Schriftenreihe der Eidgenössischen Turn- und Sportschule Magglingen. Birkhäuser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-6718-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-6718-4_5

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Basel

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7643-1157-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-0348-6718-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics