Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Örtliches und zeitliches Auftreten

  • Chapter
Trennflächenformulierungen für die statische und dynamische Berechnung von Bogenstaumauern

Part of the book series: Institut für Baustatik und Konstruktion ((IBK,volume 163))

  • 35 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

In unbewehrten Betonbauten beträgt die statische Zugfestigkeit nur 8 – 10% der Druckfestigkeit. Sie erhöht sich für schnelle Beanspruchung; andererseits kann sie infolge Vorschäden während des Bauvorgangs (Hydratationsspannungen) oder nicht erfaßbarer Nebenspannungen während des Betriebs (wie Temperatureigenspannungen, Porenwasserdruck) für äußere Einwirkungen im entscheidenden Zeitpunkt gar nicht mehr zur Verfügung stehen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Abadzhyan K.A., Argal, E.S., Korolev V.H.: Evaluation of the mechanical properties of the mass of a concrete dam with interblock joints. Hydro-tech. Constr. 14 (1980) 9, 901–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A3-Bau (Red.): Kölnbrein-Sperre — teure Schlupflöcher. A3-Bau Osterr. Baumagazin, Okt 1985, 38–44.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Altinisik D., Back P.A.A., et al.: Aseismic design of arch dams, perticularly the contribution from the reservoir and multiple-support excitation of the base. ICE Conf. “Dams and Earthquakes”, London 1980. Proc. [ICE, Tellford 19817, paper 24, 213–220. Auch: Altinisik, Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Bristol 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arthur H.G.: Nambe Falls — A prestressed dam. World Dams 77, 496–501.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baba K.: Model and full-scale concrete dam studies in Japan. Res. Conf. on Earthqu. Eng., Skopje (YU) 1980. Prepr., 413–426.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bahtin B.H., Cerniayski V.: About the importance of preserving some nonmonolithic parts in arch dams upon their dynamic behaviour (russ.). Constructii si Arhitectura 16 (1973) 3.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baustädter K., Widmann R.: The behaviour of Kölnbrein arch dam. 15th ICOLD, Q.57 R.37, Lausanne (CH) 1985. Proc., 633–651.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Beleu’kii B.S., Zinchenko N.A.: Shear characteristics and tightness of construction joints with various technologies of their treatment (russ.). Energ. Stroit. 8 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bellier J., Laroche C.: Description comparée de quelques barrages en béton pour vallées larges. 7th ICOLD, Q.26 R.10, Rome 1961. Proc. 3, 213–228.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bellier H.J.: Le barrage de Malpasset. Travaux 50 (1967) 389, 363–383.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Biedermann R., Berchten A.R., Lombardi G. et al.: Comportement anormal du barrage-voûte de Zeuzier (Suisse). Wasser-Energie-Luft 74 (1982) 3, 65–112.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Biedermann R.: Außergewöhnliche Untergrundverformungen bei der Talsperre Zeuzier. Felsbau 2 (1984) 4, 214–217.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bilfinger+Berger AG: Staudamm und Wasserkraftanlage Oymapinar — Herstellung der doppelt gekrümmten Bogenstaumauer, Sonderdr. Dt. Betontag, Mannheim 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Boeuf A.P.: Barrages voûtes en anneau. 5th ICOLD, Paris 1955. Proc., C.43.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Boggs H.L., Mays J.R.: Effects of vertical contraction joints on the dynamic response of arch dams. US-Japan Nat. Res. Conf., Gaithersburg/Md. 1986. Manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bonazzi D., Combelle J. et al.: Expérience acquisé sur le vieillissement et l’entretien des dispositifs d’étenchéité et de drainage des fondations des barrages d’Eléctricité de France. 15th ICOLD, Q.58 R.77, Lausanne (CH) 1985. Proc., 1311–1328.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Borovoy A., Mikhailov L., Hoiselev I.: Adjoining of high dams with canyon walls. 13th ICOLD, Q.48 R.48, New Delhi 1979. Proc. 1, 865–878.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Boves D.E., Sison A.X., O’Neill A.L.: Hazard assessment of arch dam in seismic zone. ASCE J. 107 (1981) HY2, 193–208.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Calciati F., Castoldi A. et al.: Experience gained during in-situ artificial and natural dynamic excitation of large concrete dams in Italy. 13th ICOLD, Q.51 R.32, New Delhi 1979. Proc. 2, 1377–1402.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chwalla E.: Beurteilung dünner Gewölbemauern und insbesondere der Talsperre Malpasset vom statischen Standpunkt. Osterr. Wasserwirt. 12 (1960) 8 /9, 157–161.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Clough R.W.: Nonlinear mechanisms in the seismic response of arch dams. Res. Conf. on Earthqu. Eng., Skopje (YU) 1980. Prepr. pap. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Clough R.W., Stephen R.H., Kuo J.S.-H.: Dynamic response analysis of Techi dam. Report UCB/EERC-82/11, Berkeley 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Clough R.W., Chang K.-T., Chen H.-Q. et al.: Dynamic response behavior of Xiang Hong Dian dam. UCB/EERC-84/02, Berkeley 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Clough R.W., Chang K.-T., Chen H.-Q. et al.: Dynamic response behavior of Quan Shui dam. UCB/EERC-84–20, Berkeley 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Clough R.W., Chang K.-T., Chen H.-Q. et al.: Dynamic interaction effects in arch dams. UCB/EERC-85–11, Berkeley 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Comité Français des Grands Barrages: Infiltrations dans les barrages d’Eléctricité de France — constatations, interprétations et traitement. 12th ICOLD, Q45. R.20, Mexico 1976. Proc.., 330–340.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Construction Today (Red.): Jacks shore cracked Kölnbrein. Construction Today 3 (1987), 5. Okt.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cosmetatos M.: Essais sur les joints de bétonnage en vue d’assurer la continuité monolithique des barrages-voutes. 7th ICOLD, C.10, Rome (I) 1961. Proc. 4, 685–692.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Coyne A.: Arch dams — Their philosophy. ASCE J. 82 (1956) P02, 959/1–17

    Google Scholar 

  30. Deinum J.P., Dungar R., Ellis B.R. et al.: Vibration tests on Emossonarch dam, Switzerland. Earthqu. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 10 (1982), 447–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Demmer W., Ludescher H.: Measures taken to reduce uplift and seapage at Kölnbrein dam. 15th ICOLD, Q.58 R.81, Lausanne (CH) 1985. Proc., 13711393.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Demmer W., Ludescher H., Führung auf der Sperre Kölnbrein am 9. 8. 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Dreher K.J.: Seismic analysis and design consideration for concrete dams. ICE Conf. “Dams and Earthquakes”, London (GB) 1980. Proc. [ICE 1981], paper 19, 161–169.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Dumanoglu A.A., Severn R.T.: Dynamic response of dams and other structures to differential ground motions. ICE Proc. part 2, 77 (1984), 333–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Dumanoglu A.A., Severn R.T.: Dynamic response of dams and other structures to differential ground motions. Auch. 8th WCEE, San Francisco/Ca. 1984. Proc. 5, 127–133.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Dungar R.: Aseismic design considerations for a large arch dam. ICE Conf. “Dams and Earthquakes”, London (GB) 1980. Proc. [ICE 1981], paper 6, 37–55.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Dungar R.: Analysis of plastic deformations leading to cracking of grouted contraction joints in Zervreila arch dam. 15th ICOLD, Q.57 R.20, Lausanne (CH) 1985. Proc. 2, 343–365.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ellis B.R., Jeary A.P., Severn R.T.: Lessons from prototype dynamic measurements and corresponding analyses. 15th ICOLD, Q.56 R.70., Lausanne (CH) 1985. Proc., 1351–1372.

    Google Scholar 

  39. ENR (Red.): Two arch dams fail through undermining of abutments. Eng. News-Rec. 97 (1926) II /16, 616–618.

    Google Scholar 

  40. ENR (Red.): Thin double-arch dam built for earthquakes. Eng. News-Rec. 178 (1967) 26, 24–25.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ferguson H.: Controversy chokes Auburn plans. New Civil Eng., 1 Oct. 1981, 22–24.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Fernandes J.S., Cruz A.A., Ferreira H.J.E.: Analysis of stresses due to dead load in dams with a marked downstream overhang. 9th ICOLD, C.11, Istamboul (TR) 1967. Proc., 479–493.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Flesch R., Eiselmayer M.: Dynamic in-situ tests on Kölnbrein arch dam. 7th WCEE, Istamboul 1980. Proc. 8, 93–100.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Forces Motrices de Mauvoisin: Mauvoisin. Sion 1959 und 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Frey M.J.-P.: La voûte très mince du barrage du Gage. Annales I.T.B.T.P. Travaux Publics 10 (1957) 114, 537–554.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Fumagalli E.: Influence des fondations sur la mécanique de rupture des barrages-voûte. 2nd ISRM, Beograd (YU) 1970. Proc. Auch: ISMES Bull. 46, Bergamo 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Fumagalli E.: Les modèles géomecaniques de fondation aux grands barrages. ISMR Int. Coll. “Physical Geomechanical Modells”, Bergamo (I) 1979. 133–147.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Gallico A.: A contribution to the design of foundation systems for arch dams. Water Power 26 (1974), 323–329.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Gell K.: Der Einfluß von Sickerströmungen im Untergrund auf die Berechnung der Spannungen und Verformungen von Bogenstaumauern. Diss. D82, Veröff. H. 11 Inst. f. Grundbau, Bodenmechanik, Felsmechanik u. Verkehrswasserbau, RWTH Aachen 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Gell K., Wittke W.: A new design concept for arch dams taking into account seepage forces. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 19 (1986) 4, 187–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Gicot H.: Conceptions et techniques de quelques barrages-voûtes Suisses. Wasser-u. Energiew. 53 (1961) 6 /7, 194–205.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Gicot H.: Le barrage coupole des Toules. Schw. Bauzeitg. 83 (1965) 42, 773–780.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Gilg B.: Erdbebenanalyse von Staumauern. Vortrag ETH Zürich, 31. 5. 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Gilg B., Indermaur W., Matthey F., Pedro O. et al.: Special design of Steno arch dam in Greece in relation with possible fault movements. ICOLD Int. Symp. “Earthquakes and Dams”, Q.1 R.16, Beijing (VRC) 1987. Proc. 202–218.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Grengg H., Lauffer H.: Der Gewölbemauerbau in Osterreich. Osterr. Bauzeitschrift 3 (1948) 8 /9, 136–144.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Guthrie L.G.: Earthquake analysis of concrete gravity dams. 3rd US Nat. Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Charleston/Sth.Ca. 1986. Proc. 1, 717–727.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Hall J.F., Donlon B.: Filmaufzeichnungen von Vorversuchen, Besichtigung der Versuchsanlage am 10. 10. 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Hall J.F.: Study of the response of Pine Flat arch dam. Earthqu. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 14 (1986) 2, 281–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Hansen K.D., Boehm L.H.: The response of concrete dams to earthquakes. Water Power 31 (1979) 4, 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Hatano T.: Aseismic design criteria for arch dams in Japan. 9th ICOLD, Q.35 R.1, Istamboul (TR) 1967. Proc. 4, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Herzog M.: Erdbebensicherheit von Talsperren. Schweiz. Techn. Zeitschrift 23 (Nov. 1979), 1550–1554.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Herzog H.A.: Failure mechanisms in dams subject to earthquakes. Water Power 72 (1980), 28–30.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Herzog M.: Wann benötigen Gewölbestaumauern Umfangsfugen? Bautechnik 64 (1987) 7, 231–235.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Herzog M.: Unerwartetes Verhalten großer Gewölbestaumauern. Wasserwirtschaft 77 (1987) 12, 651–656.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Hilf J.W., Copen M.D.: Economic factors in the design and construction of concrete dams. 11th ICOLD, Q.43 R.6, Madrid (E) 1973. Proc. 3, 1051–1069.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Hohberg J.-M.: Linear-elastische FE-Studien an einer Bogenstaumauer des Mauvoisin-Typs. Inst. Baustatik + Konstr., ETH Zürich 1985, unveröffentlicht.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Indermaur W., Dawans P.: Longterm behaviour of large span arch dams — Les Toules. Swiss Dams Monitoring and Surveillance [SNGT] 1985, 148–156.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Intern. Engineering Co. Inc. (IECO): Investigation and reanalysis of Pacoima arch dam. San Francisco/Ca., Aug. 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Intern. Engineering Co. Inc. (IECO): Investigation and reanalysis of Santa Anita dam. San Francisco/Ca., Aug. 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Jaeger C.: The Malpasset report. Water Power 55 (1963), 55–61.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Jaeger C.: The Malpasset report. Water Power 55 (1963), 137–138

    Google Scholar 

  72. Jaeger C.: The Malpasset report. Water Power 55 (1963), 228–230.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Jaeger C.: Rock mechanics and dam design. Water Power 16 (1964) 5, 210–217.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Kreuzer H.L.: The design of El Cajon arch dam — a retrospective view. Water Power 34 (1982), 16–23.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Krishna H.: Arch dam failures — Causes, precautions and remedial measures. Indian J. Power & River Valley Devel. 31 (1981) 89, 153–158.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Kroll B., Gespräche im Department of Public Works, Los Angeles County Flood Control District /Calif., Oct. 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Laborie J.: Le barrage du Vaiont. Technique des Travaux 30 (1962) 910, 306–320.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Lanser O.: Uberblick über die Talsperrenkatastrophen der Vergangenheit. Osterr. Wasserwirt. 12 (1960) 89, 142–152.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Lauffer H.: Der Bruch der Staumauer Malpasset und der Gewölbemauerbau in Osterreich. Osterr. Wasserwirt. 12 (1960) 89, 179–187.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Lauffer H., Golder H.Q., Discussion to Techn. Session Q.32 (Uplift), 9th ICOLD, Istamboul (TR) 1967. Proc. 6, 136–141.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Leuenberger J.: Les déformations des fondations des barrages-voûte de grande portée et leur influence sur les infiltrations décrites dans l’exemple du barrage de Santa-Maria. 12th ICOLD, Q.45 R.44, Mexico 1976. Proc., 727–747.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Leuenberger J.: Felsverformungen unter Talsperren. Wasser-Energie-Luft 73 (1981) 4, 62–64.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Lindvall, Richter & Assoc. (LRA): Investigation and reanalysis of Big Tujunga dam. Los Angeles/Ca., Oct. 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Link H.: Neuere Talsperrenbauten in Osterrreich. Bautechnik 30 (1953) 2, 42–50

    Google Scholar 

  85. Link H.: Neuere Talsperrenbauten in Osterrreich. Bautechnik 30 (1953) 96–103.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Linse D.: Wechselwirkung zwischen Felswiderlager und Bogenstaumauer. 4. Int. Tagg. Felsmechanik, Aachen (D ) 1980. Manuskript.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Linse D.: Die Gründungsfuge von Staumauern — Beanspruchung und konstruktive Ausbildung. Wasserwirt. 74 (1984) 3, 142–146.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Londe P.: Le barrage de Tolla. 9th ICOLD, Q.34 Techn. Sess., Istamboul (TR) 1967. Proc. 6, 365–367.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Londe P.: Rock mechanics and dam design. ICOLD Spec. Bull., 1973 (rev. ed. 1982 ).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Los Angeles County Flood Control District: Archivunterlagen der Staumauer Pacoima. Priv. Kontakt 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Magnet E., Widmann R.: Gründungsprobleme der Gewölbemauer Kölnbrein. 4th ISRM Denver/Co. 1974. Proc. 2B, 902–907.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Mary M.: Barrages-voûtes, Accidents et incidents. Dunod, Paris 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Mgalobelov Y.B., Lomov I.E.: Investigations and provisions of safety of the rock foundation of Inguri arch dam. Int. Symp. “Num. Meth. in Geomech.”, Zürich 1982. Proc., 806–813.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Oberti G.: Essais sur modèles des barrages. Wasser-u. Energiew. 48 (1956) 7/8/9, 187–200.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Oberti G., Lauletta E.: Structural models for the study of dam earthquake resistance. 9th ICOLD, Q.35 R.26, Istamboul (TR) 1967. Proc. 4, 431–442.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Oberti G., Castoldi A.: The use of models in assessing the behaviour of concrete dams. ICE Conf. “Dams and Earthquakes”, London (GB) 1980. Proc. [ICE, Tellford 1981], paper 25, 221–230.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Okamoto S., Takahashi T.: On behavior of an arch dam during earthquakes. 2nd WCEE, Tokyo/Kyoto (J) 1960. Proc. 2, 1401–1412.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Okamoto S., Takahashi T.: Observation of earthquakes on arch dams. Trans. JSCE 76 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  99. Pacher F.: Zur meStechnischen Kontrolle des Gründungsfelsens von Bogenstaumauern. Felsmech. Ingenieurgeol. Suppl. 3 (1967), 74–83.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Pancheaud F.: Application de la précontrainte aux barrages-voûtes minces — Le barrage de Tourtemagne en Valais (Suisse). 6th IABSE, Stockholm (S) 1960. Prelim. Publ., 851–862.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Paskalov T.A., Petrovski J.T., Jurukovski D.V.: Full-scale forced vibration studies and mathematical model formulation of arch concrete dams. ICE Conf. “Dams and Earthquakes”, London (GB) 1980). Proc. [ICE 1981], paper 31, 275–285.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Porter C.S., Chopra A.K.: Dynamic response of simple arch dams including hydrodynamic interaction. UCB/EERC-80/17, Berkeley 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Portuguese NCOLD: Cracking and repair works in Cabril dam. 15th ICOLD, Q.57 R.21, Lausanne (CH) 1985. Proc. 2, 367–398.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Priscu R., Stematiu D. et al.: Critical considerations on arch dam mathematical models. Int. Symp. “Criteria and Assumptions for Numerical Analysis of Dams”, Swansea (GB) 1975. Proc. [Naylor et al.], 264–284.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Rebaudi A.: Observation of the behaviour of dams in the course of time through measurements of the velocity of propagation of elastic waves and measurements of the periods of vibration of the voussoirs of the structure. 9h ICOLD, Q.34 R.49, Istamboul (TR) 1967. Proc., 833–857.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Reimer R.B., Clough R.W., Raphael J.N.: Evaluation of the Pacoima dam accelerogram. 5th WCEE, Rome (I) 1974. Proc., 2328–2337.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Rescher O.J.: Calcul des sollicitations d’un barrage-voûte dans la zone d’encastrement des arcs. Bull. Techn. Suisse Rom. 89 (1963) 3, 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Rocha M., Serafim J.L., De Silveira A.F.: Design and observations of arch dams in Portugal. ASCE J. 82 (1956) P03, 9971–49.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Rocha H., Serafim J.L. et al.: Observations of concrete dams, results obtained in Cabril dam. 6th ICOLD, Q.21 R.83, New York/N.Y. 1958. Proc. 2, 878–926.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Rocha M.: Statement of the physical problem of the arch dam. Int. Symp. “Theory of Arch Dams”, Southampton Univ. (GB) 1964. Proc. [Rydzewski 1965], 3–22 + 101.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Rocha M., Da Silveira A.F. et al.: Influence on the behaviour of an arch dam of the hydrostatic pressure on the grout curtain and of the stresses in the ground upstream. 10th ICOLD, Q.39 R.29, Montreal (CDN) 1970. Proc., 541–557.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Rocha M.: Analsis and design of the foundations of concrete dams (gen. rep.). ISRM/ABMS Int. Symp. “Rock Mechanics Related to Dam Foundations”, Rio de Janeiro (BRA) 1982. Proc. 2, III. 11–70.

    Google Scholar 

  113. Roselló J.G.: Discussion to Techn. Session Q.32, 9th ICOLD, Istamboul (TR) 1967. Proc. 6, 143–145.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Rouse G.C., Roehm L.H.: An arch dam design method for seismic loadings. 5th WCEE, Rome (I) 1974. Proc., 994–999.

    Google Scholar 

  115. Row D., Schricker V.: Analysis of earthquake induced response for structures with localized nonlinearities. SSD Cons. Inc., Report to Nat. Sc. Found., Berkeley 1983. Auch: 8th WCEE, San Francisco/Ca. 1984. Proc. 4, 475–482.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Schnitter N.J.: Predicted and observed interaction of Emosson arch dam with the righthand rock barrier. 13th ICOLD, Q.48 R.40, New Delhi 1979. Proc., 715–727.

    Google Scholar 

  117. Schnitter N.J.: Messen von Porenwasserdrücken im Untergrund der Bogenstaumauer Zervreila. Wasser-Energie-Luft73 (1981) 4, 75–77.

    Google Scholar 

  118. Schnitzler E.: Mesures de protection contre les effets de la sous-pression et des infiltrations au barrage-voûte de Gigerwald. Wasser-Energie-Luft 73 (1981) 4, 65–70.

    Google Scholar 

  119. Semenza C.: Uberlegungen zur Auflagergestaltung von Bogenstaumauern. Bautechnik 32 (1955) 12, 393–396.

    Google Scholar 

  120. Semenza C.: Arch dams — Development in Italy. ASCE J. 82 (1956) P03, 1017/1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  121. Semenza C.: Einige praktische Uberlegungen zum Problem der Gründung von Staumauern und Staudämmen. Geologie u. Bauw. 24 (1958) 2, 63–81.

    Google Scholar 

  122. Semenza C., Di Brai L., Capra U.: Ambiesta dam. 6th ICOLD, C.22, New York 1958. Proc. 4, 347–357.

    Google Scholar 

  123. Serafim J.L., Pedro J.O.: Seismic study of arch dam. ASCE J. 91 (1965) ST2, 15–25.

    Google Scholar 

  124. Serafim J.L.: New shapes for arch dams. ASCE Civil Eng. 36 (1966) 11, 38–43.

    Google Scholar 

  125. Serafim J.L., Guerreiro H., Florez C.G.: Economical concepts of concrete dams after results of observations. 11th ICOLD, Q.43 R.16, Madrid 1973. Proc. 3, 1197–1215.

    Google Scholar 

  126. Serafim J.L.: Lessons from experience and research on the safety of dams. 2nd ICOSSAR, München (D) 1977. Proc. [Kupfer et al.], 349–362.

    Google Scholar 

  127. Simonds A.W.: Arch dams — Theory, methods and details of joint grouting. ASCE J. 82 (1956) P03, 991/1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  128. SNGT: Comportement des grands barrages Suisses. Bern 1964. Fortsg.: Barrages Suisses — Surveillance et entretien (franz./engl.), Zürich 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  129. Stucky A.: Etudes expérimentales de problèmes relatifs à la construction des barrages-rléservoirs. Bull. Schw. Elektrotechn. Verein 44 (1953) 12, 513–521.

    Google Scholar 

  130. Stucky A.: Barrage-voûtes en Suisse. Wasser-u. Energiew. 48 (1956) 7/8/9, 230–240.

    Google Scholar 

  131. Stucky A., Stucky J.P., Schnitzler E.: Conceptions actuelles dans la construction des barrages-voûtes en Suisse. Wasser-u. Energiew. 53 (1961) 6 /7, 183–193.

    Google Scholar 

  132. Sudakov V.B., Hinarskii A.E. et al.: Shear characteristics of horizontal construction joints of the Toktogul dam (russ.). Gidrotekh. Stroit. 5 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  133. Sundquist D.C., Kollgar-d E.B.: Design and construction of Ross dam in successive stages. 13th ICOLD, Q.48 R.2, New Delhi (IND) 1979. Proc., 21–43.

    Google Scholar 

  134. Swaminathan K.V.: Structural behaviour of arch dams on elastic foundations. Int. Symp. “Theory of Arch Dams”, Southampton Univ. (GB) 1964. Proc. [Rydzewski 1965], 551–584 (+ disc.).

    Google Scholar 

  135. Swanson A.A., Sharma R.P.: Effects of the 1971 San Fernando earthquake on Pacoima arch dam. 13th ICOLD, Q.51 R.3, New Delhi (IND) 1979. Proc. 2, 797–824.

    Google Scholar 

  136. Tarbox G.S., Dreher K.J., Carpenter L.R.: Seismic analysis of concrete dams. 13th ICOLD, Q.51 R.11, New Delhi (IND) 1979. Proc. 2, 963–994.

    Google Scholar 

  137. Tardieu B., Bertrand J.: Calculation of arc dams subjected to earthquakes, antiseismic design of arch dams. ICOLD Int. Symp. “Earthquakes and Dams”, Q.1 R.15, Beijing (VRC) 1987. Proc., 187–201.

    Google Scholar 

  138. Tashiro N., Kimishima H.: A review on measured results and computed estimations in the analysis of Kamishiiba arch dam. 6th ICOLD, Q.21 R.24, New York/N.Y. 1958. Proc. 2, 278–300.

    Google Scholar 

  139. Thomas H.H.: The engineering of large dams. John Wiley, London 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  140. Tölke F.: Talsperren. Wasserkraftanlagen [Ludin], Handbibl. Bauingenieure Bd. 9, J.Springer, Berlin 1938. 278–534.

    Google Scholar 

  141. Tölke F.: Entwicklung im Talsperrenbau. Wasserwirt. 42 (1952) 4, 89–120.

    Google Scholar 

  142. Uchida T., Higashigawa T.: A study on interface on new and old concrete with particular reference to the raising of a gravity dam. 13th ICOLD, Q.48 R.25, New Delhi (IND) 1979. Proc., 431–457.

    Google Scholar 

  143. Veltrop J.A.: Visit to the USSR and the Inguri project. Article.

    Google Scholar 

  144. Weber E.: Die Katastrophe von Vaiont in Oberitalien. Wasser-u. Energiew. 56 (1964) 2 /3, 61–69.

    Google Scholar 

  145. Widmann R., Heigerth G.: Rock deformations and seepage flow in the foundation of the Schlegeis arch dam. 12th ICOLD, Q.45 R.39, Mexico 1976. Proc., 661–673.

    Google Scholar 

  146. Widmann R., Stäuble H.: Interpretation of data obtained from measurements of deformations in the foundation of the Schlegeis arch dam. 14th ICOLD, Q.52 R.11, Rio de Janeiro (BRA) 1982. Proc., 203–217.

    Google Scholar 

  147. Widmann R.: Grundlagen für den Entwurf der Staumauer Zillergründl. Wasserwirt. 74 (1984) 3, 147–152.

    Google Scholar 

  148. Widmann R., mündliche Erläuterung zum Entwurf der Sperre Zillergründl. Salzburg (A), Juli 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  149. Wulf J.G., Van Orden R.C.: Evaluation on the earthquake stability of Lower Crystal Springs dam. 13th ICOLD, Q.51 R.1, New Delhi (IND) 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  150. Zienkiewicz O.C., Clough R.W., Seed H.B.: Seismic analysis procedures for concrete and earth dams. Rep. to ICOLD, 1983. ICOLD Bull. 52, Paris 1986.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Jörg-Martin Hohberg M.SC. Dipl.-Ing.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer Basel AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hohberg, JM. (1988). Örtliches und zeitliches Auftreten. In: Trennflächenformulierungen für die statische und dynamische Berechnung von Bogenstaumauern. Institut für Baustatik und Konstruktion, vol 163. Birkhäuser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-5251-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-5251-7_2

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Basel

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7643-1993-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-0348-5251-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation