Skip to main content

Diagrammatic Reasoning with Classes and Relationships

  • Chapter
Visual Reasoning with Diagrams

Part of the book series: Studies in Universal Logic ((SUL))

Abstract

We present and discuss a diagrammatic visualization and reasoning language coming about by augmenting Euler diagrams with higraphs. The diagrams serve (hierarchical as well as trans-hierarchical) classification and specification of various logical relationships between classes. The diagrams rely on a well-defined underlying class-relationship logic, called CRL, being a fragment of predicate logic. The inference rules at the level of diagrams take form of simple diagrammatic ipso facto rules. The diagrams are intended for computerization by offering navigation and zooming facilities as known from road maps. As such they may facilitate ontological engineering, which often involves larger amounts of data. The underlying inference process is expressible in function-free definite clauses, datalog. We also discuss the relationship to similar diagram and logic proposals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Allwein, G., Barwise, J.: Logical Reasoning with Diagrams. Oxford University Press, London (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Armstrong, D.: A Theory of Universals. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barwise, J., Hammer, E.: Diagrams and the concept of a logical system. In: [1]

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brink, C., et al.: Peirce algebras. Form. Asp. Comput. 6(3), 339–358 (1994)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Dau, F., Fish, A.: Conceptual spider diagrams. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Conceptual Structures. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5113, pp. 104–118. Springer, Berlin (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fischer Nilsson, J.: A conceptual space logic. In: Kawaguchi, E., et al. (eds.) Information Modelling and Knowledge Bases XI. 9th European-Japanese Conferences on Information Modelling and Knowledge Bases, Iwate, Japan, May 24–28, 1999, pp. 26–40. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fischer Nilsson, J.: Ontological constitutions for classes and properties. In: Int. Conference on Conceptual Structures. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4068, pp. 37–53. Springer, Berlin (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fischer Nilsson, J.: On reducing relationships to property ascriptions. In: Kiyoki, Y., et al. (eds.) Information Modelling and Knowledge Bases XX. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 190, pp. 245–252. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fischer Nilsson, J.: Querying class-relationship logic in a metalogic framework. In: Flexible Query Answering Systems FQAS 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7022 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fischer Nilsson, J., Palomäki, J.: Towards computing with intensions and extensions of concepts. In: Charrel, P.-J., et al. (eds.) Information Modelling and Knowledge Bases IX, pp. 100–114. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fish, A., Flower, J., Howse, J.: The semantics of augmented constraint diagrams. J. Vis. Lang. Comput. 16(6), 541–573 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gabbay, D.M., Woods, J. (eds.): Handbook of the History of Logic, vol. 3, The Rise of Modern Logic: From Leibniz to Frege. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gärdenfors, P.: Conceptual Spaces: On the Geometry of Thought. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gil, J., Howse, J., Kent, S.: Towards a formalization of constraint diagrams. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 2001 Symposia on Human Centric Computing Languages and Environments (HCC’01) (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Grosof, B.N., Horrocks, I., Volz, R., Decker, S.: Description logic programs: combining logic programs with description logic. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth International World Wide Web Conference, WWW2003, Budapest, Hungary, 2003, pp. 48–57. ACM, New York (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Hamfelt, A., Fischer Nilsson, J.: Towards a logic programming methodology based on higher-order predicates. New Gener. Comput. 15(4), 421–448 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hammer, E.M.: Logic and Visual Information. CSLI, Stanford (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Harel, D.: On visual formalisms. Commun. ACM 31(5), 514–530 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Howse, J.: Diagrammatic reasoning systems. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Conceptual Structures: Knowledge Visualization and Reasoning. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 5113, pp. 1–20 (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Howse, J., et al.: Euler diagram-based notations. University of Brighton and University of Kent, UK

    Google Scholar 

  21. Merrill, G.H.: Ontological realism: methodology or misdirection? Appl. Ontol. 5(2), 79–108 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Oliver, I., Howse, J., Stapleton, G., Nuutila, E., Törmä, S.: A proposed diagrammatic logic for ontology specification and visualization. In: 8th International Semantic Web Conference (Posters and Demos) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sánchez Valencia, V.: The algebra of logic. In: [12]

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shin, S.-J.: The Iconic Logic of Peirce’s Graphs. MIT Press, Cambridge (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Smith, B.: Against fantalogy. In: Reicher, M.E., Marek, J.C. (eds.) Experience and Analysis, pp. 153–170 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Smith, B., Rosse, C.: The Role of Foundational Relations in the Alignment of Biomedical Ontologies, MEDINFO 2004, pp. 444–448. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sowa, J.: Knowledge Representation: Logical, Philosophical and Computational Foundations. Brooks Cole, Pacific Grove (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  28. van Benthem, J.: Essays in Logical Semantics. Reidel, Dordrecht (1986)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to Sun-Joo Shin and Bartlomiej Szymczak, and to the anonymous reviewers for helpful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jørgen Fischer Nilsson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Basel

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fischer Nilsson, J. (2013). Diagrammatic Reasoning with Classes and Relationships. In: Moktefi, A., Shin, SJ. (eds) Visual Reasoning with Diagrams. Studies in Universal Logic. Birkhäuser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-0600-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics