Skip to main content

Why the Fregean “Square of Opposition” Matters for Epistemology

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Studies in Universal Logic ((SUL))

Abstract

A relevant issue for epistemology is the distinction between expression of a “judgeable content” and “judgment”. We would suggest that Frege’s enterprise in the Begriffsschrift seems to be devoted to describe this difference from a formal point of view. For, he considers an expression as a simple or complex sign characterized by the function/argument structure. In our contribution, we try to elucidate Frege’s effort by analyzing his variation of the Aristotelian “square of opposition” and by following his logical steps from an “epistemological” point of view which overcome the classical Aristotelian syllogism but plausibly respects the fundamental distinction between “judgeable content” and “judgment”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Frege, G.: Begriffsschrift, eine arithmetischen nachbildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens. Nebert, Halle (1879). In: Beaney, M. (ed.) The Frege Reader, pp. 47–78. Blackwell, Oxford (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sluga, H.: Gottlob Frege. Routledge & Kegan, London (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kant, I.: Critique of Pure Reason. Smith, N.K. (trans.). University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (1929)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Frege, G.: Letter to Marty, 29.8.1882. In: Beaney, M. (ed.) The Frege Reader, pp. 47–78. Blackwell, Oxford (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Heck, R.G., May, R.: The Function is Unsaturated. Brown University and University of California Davis (unpublished). http://Frege.brown.edu

  6. Boole, G.: The Laws of Thought. Walton and Maberly, London (1854)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Frege, G.: Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik (1884). In: Beaney, M. (ed.) The Frege Reader, pp. 84–129. Blackwell, Oxford (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Frege, G.: Funktion und Begriff. Vortrag gehalten in der Sitzung vom 9. Januar 1891 der Jenaischen Gesellschaft für Medizin und Naturwissenschaft. H. Pole, Jena. Trans.: Function and concept. In: Beaney, M. (ed.) The Frege Reader. Blachwell, Oxford (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Frege, G.: Die Verneinung. Beitr. Dtsch. Ideal. 3 (1918). In: Beaney, M. (ed.) The Frege Reader, pp. 346–361. Blackwell, Oxford (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raffaela Giovagnoli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Basel

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Giovagnoli, R. (2012). Why the Fregean “Square of Opposition” Matters for Epistemology. In: Béziau, JY., Jacquette, D. (eds) Around and Beyond the Square of Opposition. Studies in Universal Logic. Springer, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-0379-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics