Skip to main content

Schoenflies’ 1900 Proof of CBT

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Proofs of the Cantor-Bernstein Theorem

Part of the book series: Science Networks. Historical Studies ((SNHS,volume 45))

  • 1427 Accesses

Abstract

In 1898, the German Association of Mathematicians (DMV) commissioned Schoenflies to write a report on “Curves and point manifolds”. The first part of the report was published in 1900 under the title “The development of the science of point manifolds”. The report was updated in 1908 and 1913 but the subject grew by that time out of the scope of any single report. In 1900, however, the report was the only text book on set theory and its applications, outside Cantor’s 1895/7 Beiträge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Cantor notes that Schröder was first to have found a proof and that then Bernstein had independently found a proof which is independent of logical calculations.

  2. 2.

    Theorem U is CBT in its two-set formulation.

  3. 3.

    Cantor is using his notation from 1895 Beiträge for union.

  4. 4.

    We translate Cantor’s “eindeutige” into 1–1. Cantor is using “projection” as did Borel.

  5. 5.

    Cantor defines K by the property required for the proof rather than as the intersection of nesting sets or the residue after removal of frames.

  6. 6.

    Schoenflies is using Cantor’s sign ‘~’ for equivalence which he defines (p 5) as Cantor by: “two sets M and N are called equivalent or of equal power (M ~ N), in case it is possible, according to some law, to put them in one-one correlation.”

  7. 7.

    Schoenflies follows Cantor’s notation for union (§3 of Cantor’s 1895 Beiträge). Note that Schoenflies notation for the sets generated in the proof is idiosyncratic for he uses signs derived from M, N for the frames and not for the nested sets, which are equivalent to M, N. In Schoenflies 1913 (p 34f) the notation was set straight.

References

  • Borel E. Leçons sur la théorie des functions, 1950 edition, Gauthiers-Villars: Paris; 1898

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor G. Beiträge zur Begründung der transfiniten Mengenlehre, (‘1895 Beiträge’). Cantor 1932;282–311. English translation: Cantor 1915.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meschkowski H, Nilsen W. Georg Cantor: briefe. Berlin: Springer; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröder E. Über Zwei Defitionen der Endlichkeit und G. Cantorsche Sätze, Nova Acta. Abhandlungen der Kaiserlichen Leopold-Carolinschen deutchen Akademie der Naturfoscher. 1898;71:301–62.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arie Hinkis .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Basel

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hinkis, A. (2013). Schoenflies’ 1900 Proof of CBT. In: Proofs of the Cantor-Bernstein Theorem. Science Networks. Historical Studies, vol 45. Birkhäuser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-0224-6_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics