Abstract
Kin and group selection are two different ways to describe the evolution of social behaviour. Although these two explanations are compatible in many cases, they lead to a different perspective on the interpretation of the drivers of the evolution of social behaviour. Here, I will illustrate in a model based on the haystack model, which is often used in the context of group selection, that it allows a kin selection as well as a group selection interpretation. To do so I will analyse a variant of the haystack model in which the local dynamics are specified through a continuous time model. From the description of the dynamics the cost and the benefits of the interaction can be calculated, as well as the relatedness. We also revisit the interpretation of Maynard-Smith, who originally described the model, and show that this interpretation can be found if one assumes strong selection. This shows how the various interpretations of the evolution of social behaviour all can follow from the same model. It also shows how ecological details of the interaction are crucially important in interpreting and understanding the process of evolution.
Mathematics Subject Classification (2000). 91-XX, 91A22, 92Bxx, 92Dxx, 92D15.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
C. Darwin, The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. John Murray, London, 1871.
C. Darwin, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. John Murray, London, 1859.
R.A. Fisher, The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1930.
J.B.S. Haldane, Population genetics. New Biol. 18 (1955), 34–51.
W.D. Hamilton, Genetical evolution of social behaviour I. J. Theor. Biol. 7 (1964), 1.
J. Maynard Smith, Group selection and kin selection. Nature 201 (1964), 1145.
A. Grafen, A geometric view of relatedness. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology 2 (1985), 28–89.
V.C. Wynne-Edwards, Animal Dispersion in Relation to Social Behaviour. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, 1962.
D.S. Wilson, Theory of group selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 72 (1975), 143– 146.
V.A.A. Jansen and G.S.E.E. Mulder, Evolving biodiversity. Ecol. Lett. 2 (1999), 379–386.
V.A.A. Jansen and R. Vitalis, The evolution of dispersal in a Levins’ type metapopulation model. Evolution 61 (2007), 2386–2397.
J.A.J. Metz, R.M. Nisbet, and S.A.H. Geritz, How should we define “fitness” for general ecological scenarios? Trends Ecol. Evol. 7 (1992), 198–202.
J. Bryden and V.A.A. Jansen, The impact of clonal mixing on the evolution of social behaviour in aphids. P. Roy. Soc. B: Biological Sciences 277 (2010), 1651–1657.
D.C. Queller and K.F. Goodnight, Estimation of genetic relatedness using allozymedata. Evolution 43 (1989), 258–275.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Basel AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jansen, V.A.A. (2011). On Kin and Group Selection, and the Haystack Model. In: Chalub, F., Rodrigues, J. (eds) The Mathematics of Darwin’s Legacy. Mathematics and Biosciences in Interaction. Springer, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-0122-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-0122-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Basel
Print ISBN: 978-3-0348-0121-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-0348-0122-5
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)