Advertisement

Topology Catastrophe: Catastrophe Narrativization of Urban Morphologies

  • Matt Demers
Part of the Nexus Network Journal book series (NNJ, volume 12,3)

Abstract

This paper applies Rene Thom’s catastrophe theory morphologies to the historical narrativization of urban environments. The confluence of narrative and topology could yield a qualitative yet stable spatial representation of the dynamic development of the human environment. Catastrophe Theory seeks such a qualitative and stable representation of discontinuous or chaotic behavior. Here the descriptions of catastrophe theory are applied to urban forms as a series of “narrative spatial operators” that affectively change the narrative space of urban histories or narratives of urban formation. Each operator is understood to be a combinatorial set of several of Rene Thom’s elemental catastrophe morphologies, elemental relations found in communicative materials and used as building blocks of meaning. What is sought is the application of these elemental blocks to the city as an evolving environment. Such an application could possibly be developed into a method for explaining archetypal moments in the development of human settlements, an ontology and epistemology of development that is dynamic like the city itself, yet simple and easily accessed. This topological narrativization is briefly deployed to examine certain aspects in the development of the city of Chandigarh, India.

Keywords

equilibrium equilibria mappings transformations morphology topology Rene Thom spatial operators catastrophe theory urban design Chandigarh 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Havelock, Eric A. 1986. The Muse Learns to Write: Reflections on Orality and Literacy from Antiquity to the Present. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Kalia, Ravi. 1987. Chandigarh: In Search of an Identity. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Serres, Michel. 1992. Language and Space: From Oedipus to Zola. Pp. 39–53 in Hermes: Literature, Science, Philosophy, Josue V. Harari and David F. Bell, eds. and trans. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  4. 1. 2007. The Parasite. Lawrence R. Schehr, trans. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  5. Thom, René. 1974. De l’icone au symbole: esquisse d’une théorie du symbolisme. Pp. 229–251 in Modèles mathématiques de la morphogénese: Recueil de textes sur la théorie des catastrophes et ses applications. Paris: Union Générale d’Editions.Google Scholar
  6. 1. 1975. Structural Stability and Morphogenesis: An Outline of a General Theory of Models. D. H. Fowler, trans. Reading, Mass.: W. A. Benjamin.Google Scholar
  7. Wildgen, Wolfgang. 1982. Catastrophe Theoretic Semantics: An Elaboration and Application of Rene Thom’s Theory. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  8. Woodcock, Alexander and Monte DAVIS. 1978. Catastrophe Theory. New York: E. P. Dutton.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Zadeh, Lotfi A. 1993. Fuzzy Sets. Pp. 27–64 in Readings in Fuzzy Sets for Intelligent Systems, Didier Dubois, Henri Prade and Ronald R. Yager, eds. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kim Williams Books, Turin 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matt Demers
    • 1
  1. 1.GainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations