Skip to main content

Russell and Leibniz on the Classification of Propositions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Essays on Leibniz Reception

Abstract

We owe Russell’s book on Leibniz to a very improbable series of events, of which surely the most improbable of all was that McTaggart was getting married. It was McTaggart who was scheduled to give the lectures on Leibniz that Russell ended up giving at Trinity College, Cambridge during Lent Term of 1899 and it was McTaggart’s marriage that prevented him from giving them. Now getting married (even for McTaggart) would not normally be so traumatic an event as to prevent one from lecturing, butMcTaggart’s brideto- be was a New Zealander.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

1. Works by Russell and Leibniz

  1. (see also the general list of abbreviations on p. 267 of this volume)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Russell, ‘An Analysis of Mathematical Reasoning’ (1898), in CPBR2, pp. 163–242.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Russell, ‘On the Axioms of Geometry’ (1899), in CPBR2, pp. 394–415.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Russell, Correspondance sur la philosophie, la logique et la politique avec Louis Couturat (1897–1913), ed. Anne-Françoise Schmidt (Paris: Kimé, 2001), 2 vols.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Russell, ‘The Classification of Relations’, in CPBR2, pp. 138–46.

    Google Scholar 

  6. The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, vol. 2, Philosophical Papers, 1896–99, ed. by Nicholas Griffin and Albert C. Lewis (London: Routledge, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  7. The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, vol. 3, Towards “The Principles of Mathematics”, 1900–02, ed. by Gregory H. Moore (London: Routledge, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  8. The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, vol. 4, Foundations of Logic, 1903–05, ed. by Alasdair Urquhart (London: Routledge, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  9. The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, vol. 6, Logical and Philosophical Papers, 1909–13, ed. by John G. Slater (London: Routledge, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  10. The Philosophical Works of Leibnitz, ed. by G.M. Duncan (New Haven: Tuttle, Morehouse and Taylor, 1890).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Russell, An Essay on the Foundations of Geometry (New York: Dover, 1956; 1st edn. 1897).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Russell, ‘The Fundamental Ideas and Axioms of Mathematics’ (1899), in CPBR2, pp. 265–305.

    Google Scholar 

  13. , ‘Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description’, in CPBR6, pp. 148–61.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Leibniz, Philosophical Papers and Letters, ed. L.E. Loemker (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956), 2 vols.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Russell, My Philosophical Development (London: Allen and Unwin, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Russell, ‘Necessity and Possibility’, in CPBR4, pp. 508–20.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Leibniz, New Essays Concerning Human Understanding, transl. A.G. Langley (London: Macmillan, 1896).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Russell, ‘The Nature of Truth’, Mind, 15 (1906), pp. 528–33.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Russell, ‘On Denoting’, in CPBR4, pp. 415–27.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Leibniz: Logical Papers, ed. G.H.R. Parkinson (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Russell, A Critical Exposition of the Philosophy of Leibniz (London: Allen and Unwin, 1975; 1st edn., 1900).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Russell, The Principles of Mathematics (London: Allen and Unwin, 1964; 1st edn., 1903).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Russell, ‘The Principles of Mathematics, 1899–1900 Draft’, in CPBR3, pp. 13–180.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Russell, ‘Part I of the Principles, Draft of 1901’, in CPBR3, pp. 184–208.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Leibniz, The Monadology and Other Philosophical Writings, ed. by R. Latta (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1898).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Russell, ‘On the Relations of Number and Quantity’ (1897), in CPBR2, pp. 70–82.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Russell, ‘Recent Work on the Philosophy of Leibniz’ (1903), in CPBR4, pp. 537–66.

    Google Scholar 

  28. The Selected Letters of Bertrand Russell, vol. I, The Private Years, 1884–1914 (London: Allen Lane, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

2. Works by Other Authors

  1. Adams, R.M., ‘The Reception of Leibniz’s Philosophy in the Twentieth Century’, in G.A.J. Rogers, T. Sorell, J. Kraye (eds.), Insiders and Outsiders in Seventeenth Century Philosophy (London: Routledge), pp. 309–14.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beaney, Michael, ‘Early Modern Conceptions of Analysis’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/analysis (accessed 15 October 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bradley, F.H., Appearance and Reality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Caspari, O., Leibniz’ Philosophie beleuchtet vom Gesichtspunkt der physikalischen Grundbegriffe von Kraft und Stoff (Leipzig: Voss).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Class, G., Die metaphysichen Voraussetzungen des Leibnitzischen Determinismus (Tübingen: H. Lauppschen Buchhandlung).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Connelly, James and Rabin, Paul, ‘The Correspondence between Bertrand Russell and Harold Joachim’, Bradley Studies, 2, pp. 131–60.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Couturat, Louis, La Logique de Leibniz d’après des documents inédit (Paris: Alcan).

    Google Scholar 

  8. —, ‘Sur la métaphysique de Leibniz’, Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 10, pp. 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cover, J. and O’Leary-Hawthorne, J., Substance and Individuation in Leibniz (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Curley, E.M., ‘The Root of Contingency’ in Frankfurt [1972], pp. 69–97.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dillmann, Eduard, Eine neue Darstellung der Leibnizischen Monadenlehre auf Grund der Quellen (Leipzig: O.R. Reisland).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Duncan, G.M., Review of POL, Philosophical Review, 10, pp. 288–97.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Erdmann, Johann Eduard, Versuch einer wissenschaftlichen Darstellung der Geschichte de neuern Philosophie (Riga und Dorpat: E. Frantzen, 1834–53), 6 vols. in 3.

    Google Scholar 

  14. —, Leibniz, Opera Philosophica (Berlin: Eichler).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fischer, Kuno, Geschichte de neuern Philosophie (Heidelberg: Battermann, 1889–93), 8 vols.

    Google Scholar 

  16. —, G.W. Leibniz (Heidelberg: C. Winter).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Foucher de Careil, L.A., Réfutation inédite de Spinoza par Leibniz (Paris: L’Institut de France).

    Google Scholar 

  18. —, A Refutation Recently Discovered of Spinoza by Leibniz (Edinburgh: Constable).

    Google Scholar 

  19. , Nouvelles Lettres et opuscules inédit de Leibniz (Paris: Durand).

    Google Scholar 

  20. —, Oeuvres de Leibniz (Paris: Didot), 7 vols.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Frankfurt, H.G. (ed.), Leibniz: A Collection of Critical Essays (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Frege, Gottlob, ‘On Concept and Object’ in Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, ed. by P. Geach and M. Black (Oxford: Blackwell, 1977), pp. 42–55.

    Google Scholar 

  23. —, Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence, ed. by G. Gabriel et al. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  24. 51 Fried, Dennis, ‘Necessity and Contingency in Leibniz’, reprinted in Woolhouse (ed.) [1981], pp. 55–63.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Griffin, Nicholas, Russell’s Idealist Apprenticeship (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  26. —, ‘Terms, Relations, Complexes’, in A.D. Irvine and G.A.Wedeking (eds.), Russell and Analytic Philosophy (Toronto: University of Toronto Press), pp. 159–92.

    Google Scholar 

  27. —, ‘Some Remarks on Russell’s Decompositional Style of Analysis’, in Michael Beaney (ed.), The Analytic Turn (London: Routledge, 2007), pp. 75–90.

    Google Scholar 

  28. —, ‘Bertrand Russell and Harold Joachim’, Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies, N.S. 27, pp. 220–44.

    Google Scholar 

  29. —, ‘Russell and Moore’s Rebellion against Neo-Hegelianism’, in M. Beaney (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of Analytic Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ishiguro, Hidé, Leibniz’s Philosophy of Logic and Language (London: Duckworth).

    Google Scholar 

  31. —, ‘Leibniz’s Theory of the Ideality of Relations’, in Frankfurt [1972], pp. 191– 213.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jevons, W.S., The Principles of Science (London: Macmillan, 2nd edn., 1879).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Joachim, H.H., The Nature of Truth (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Jolley, Nicholas (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Leibniz (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  35. —, Leibniz (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kulstad, Mark A., ‘A Closer Look at Leibniz’s Alleged Reduction of Relations’, Southern Journal of Philosophy, 18, pp. 417–32.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kvêt, F.B., Leibnitzens Logik (Prague: F. Tempsky).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Latta, R., Critical Notice of POL, Mind, n.s. 10, pp. 525–33.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Mates, Benson, ‘Individuals and Modality in the Philosophy of Leibniz’, Studia Leibnitiana, 4, pp. 81–118.

    Google Scholar 

  40. McCullough, Laurence B., ‘Leibniz on the Ideality of Relations’, Southwestern Journal of Philosophy, 8, pp. 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Mertz, J.T., Leibniz (Edinburgh: Blackwood).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mondadori, Fabrizio, ‘Leibniz and the Doctrine of Inter-World Identity’, 55 Studia Leibnitiana, 7, pp. 21–57.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Moore, G.E., Review of EFG, Mind, n.s. 8, pp. 397–405.

    Google Scholar 

  44. —, ‘The Nature of Judgment’, reprinted in Moore [1986], pp. 59–80.

    Google Scholar 

  45. —, ‘Necessity’, reprinted in Moore [1986], pp. 81–99.

    Google Scholar 

  46. —, ‘Kant’s Idealism’, reprinted in Moore [1986], pp. 233–46.

    Google Scholar 

  47. —, The Early Essays, ed. T. Regan (Philadelphia: Temple University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Mugnai, Massimo, Leibniz’ Theory of Relations (Stuttgart: Steiner).

    Google Scholar 

  49. —, ‘Leibniz’s Ontology of Relations: A Last Word?’ in Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy.

    Google Scholar 

  50. O’Briant, Walter H., ‘Russell on Leibniz’, Studia Leibniziana, 11, pp. 159–222.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Parkinson, G.H.R., Logic and Reality in Leibniz’s Metaphysics (Oxford; Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  52. —, ‘Philosophy and Logic’, in Jolley (ed.), 1995, pp. 199–223.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Peña, Lorenzo, ‘De la Logique combinatoire des Generales Inquisitiones aux calculs combinatoires contemporains’, Theoria (San Sebastián), 2nd series, 6, no. 14–15, pp. 129–59.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Rescher, Nicholas, The Philosophy of Leibniz (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice- Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  55. —, Leibniz: An Introduction to his Philosophy (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Selver, David, Der Entwickelungsgang der Leibniz’schen Monadenlehre bis 1695 (Leipzig: Engelmann).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Sorley, W.R., ‘Leibnitz, GottfridWilhelm’, Encyclopedia Britannica, 9th edn, 1875–89.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Stein, Ludwig, Leibniz und Spinoza (Berlin: G. Reimer).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Sylvan, Richard, Sociative Logics and their Applications, ed. D. Hyde and G. Priest (Aldershot: Ashgate).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Thilly, F., Leibnizens Streit gegen Locke in Ansehung der angeborenen Ideen (Heidelberg: J. Hörning).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Tolley, Clinton, ‘Humanizing Logic: Kant’s Departure from Leibniz’ (unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Tufts, James H., Review of POL, The American Journal of Theology, 6, pp. 104–5.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Watling, John, Bertrand Russell (Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Werckmeister,W., Der Leibnizsche Substanzbegriff (Halle a.S: M. Niemeyer).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Wernicke, F.G.F., Leibniz’ Lehre von der Freiheit des menschlichenWillens (Würzburg: F.X. Bucher.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Whitehead, A.N., A Treatise on Universal Algebra (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Woolhouse, R.S. (ed.), Leibniz: Metaphysics and Philosophy of Science (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas Griffin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Basel AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Griffin, N. (2012). Russell and Leibniz on the Classification of Propositions. In: Krömer, R., Chin-Drian, Y. (eds) New Essays on Leibniz Reception. Publications des Archives Henri Poincaré Publications of the Henri Poincaré Archives(). Springer, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0346-0504-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics