Skip to main content

Reconstruction of Bony Anatomy from Sparse Fluoroscopy Sampling Using Neural Radiance Fields

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering II (CMBBE 2023)

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) imaging is a cornerstone of modern orthopedic practice due to unmatched clarity in its volumetric reconstruction of internal bony anatomy. However, CT imaging carries the risk of elevated radiation exposure, is costly to acquire, and in certain situations is simply unavailable. While in the operating room, for instance, at a time when the information it can provide is arguably most needed, surgeons do not typically have access to CT. Instead, they must rely on 2D fluoroscopic imaging to visualize complex internal anatomy. Here, we present a method to accurately reconstruct bony anatomy from sparse fluoroscopy sampling (as few as 7 input views) in under 30 s by leveraging a recent advancement in computer vision/machine learning known as neural radiance fields, or NeRFs. Using two different surgical applications, we then demonstrate how the method performs given a variety of input fluoroscopy views, both in terms of the time it takes to reconstruct bony anatomy and the accuracy of the reconstruction. Based on these initial findings, we conclude that this method shows promise for use in the operating room as an adjunct to conventional intra-operative imaging capabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gelalis, I.D., et al.: Accuracy of pedicle screw placement: a systematic review of prospective in vivo studies comparing free hand, fluoroscopy guidance and navigation techniques. Eur. Spine J. 21(2), 247–255 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Garner, M.R., et al.: Standard perioperative imaging modalities are unreliable in assessing articular congruity of ankle fractures. J. Orthop. Trauma 29(4), 161–165 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Büchler, L., et al.: Reliability of radiologic assessment of the fracture anatomy at the posterior tibial plafond in malleolar fractures. J. Orthop. Trauma 23(3), 208–212 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ebraheim, N., Sabry, F.F., Mehalik, J.N.: Intraoperative imaging of the tibial plafond fracture: a potential pitfall. Foot Ankle Int. 21(1), 67–72 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Borrelli, J., et al.: Assessment of articular fragment displacement in acetabular fractures: a comparison of computerized tomography and plain radiographs. J. Orthop. Trauma 16(7), 449–456 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Müller, T., et al.: Instant neural graphics primitives with a multiresolution hash encoding. ACM Trans. Graph. 41(4), 1–15 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vedaldi, A., et al.: NeRF: representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis. arXiv:2003.08934 (2020)

  8. Gao, K., et al., NeRF: neural radiance field in 3d vision, a comprehensive review. arXiv:2210.00379 (2022)

  9. Rabby, A.K.M.S.A., Zhang, C.: BeyondPixels: a comprehensive review of the evolution of neural radiance fields. arXiv:2306.03000 (2023)

  10. Wysocki, M., et al.: Ultra-NeRF: neural radiance fields for ultrasound imaging. arXiv:2301.10520 (2023)

  11. Chen, Q.Y.: 3D reconstruction of endoscopy images with NeRF. dissertation, New York University Tandon School of Engineering (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rückert, D., et al.: NeAT: neural adaptive tomography. ACM Trans. Graph. 41(4), 1–13 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chen, S., Williams, L.: View interpolation for image synthesis. In: International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, pp. 279–288. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wellington, S.L., Vinegar, H.J.J.: X-ray computerised tomography. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomechanics Abstracts 25(2), 57 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Moore, C.S., et al.: A method to produce and validate a digitally reconstructed radiograph-based computer simulation for optimisation of chest radiographs acquired with a computed radiography imaging system. Br. J. Radiol. 84(1006), 890–902 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dorgham, O.M., Laycock, S.D., Fisher, M.H.: GPU accelerated generation of digitally reconstructed radiographs for 2-D/3-D image registration. TBME 59(9), 2594–2603 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Haque, M.A., et al.: Hierarchical model-based tracking of cervical vertebrae from dynamic biplane radiographs. Med. Eng. Phys. 35(7), 994–1004 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kern, A.M.: Intra-operative Biomechanical Analysis for Improvement of Intra-articular Fracture Reduction. Dissertation, University of Iowa (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Larobina, M., Murino, L.: Medical image file formats. J. Digit. Imaging 27(2), 200–206 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nelson, E.M.A., et al.: Intraoperative fluoroscopy, portable X-ray, and CT: patient and operating room personnel radiation exposure in spinal surgery. Spine J. 14(12), 2985–2991 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Su, A.W., et al.: How does patient radiation exposure compare with low-dose o-arm versus fluoroscopy for pedicle screw placement in idiopathic scoliosis? J. Pediatr. Orthop. 37(3), 171–177 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Huang, A.J., et al.: Using cone-beam CT as a low-dose 3D imaging technique for the extremities: initial experience in 50 subjects. Skeletal Radiol. 44(6), 797–809 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tajsic, T., et al.: Spinal navigation for minimally invasive thoracic and lumbosacral spine fixation: implications for radiation exposure, operative time, and accuracy of pedicle screw placement. Eur. Spine J. 27(8), 1918–1924 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Heimann, T., Meinzer, H.P.: Statistical shape models for 3D medical image segmentation: a review. Med. Image Anal. 13(4), 543–563 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zheng, G., et al.: Reconstruction of patient-specific 3D bone surface from 2D calibrated fluoroscopic images and point distribution model. In: Larsen, R., Nielsen, M., Sporring, J., Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention 2006, LNCS, vol. 4190, pp. 25–32. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11866565_4

  26. Shiode, R., Kabashima, M., Hiasa, Y., et al.: 2D–3D reconstruction of distal forearm bone from actual X-ray images of the wrist using convolutional neural networks. Sci. Rep. 11(1), 15249 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ge, R., et al.: X-CTRSNet: 3D cervical vertebra CT reconstruction and segmentation directly from 2D X-ray images. Knowl.-Based Syst. 236, 107680 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. von Landesberger, T., et al.: Opening up the “black box” of medical image segmentation with statistical shape models. Visual Computing 29(9), 893–905 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Willey, M.C., et al.: Biomechanical guidance can improve accuracy of reduction for intra-articular tibia plafond fractures and reduce joint contact stress. J. Orthop. Res.Orthop. Res. 41(3), 546–554 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was funded under grant #R18 HS025353 from the U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcus Tatum .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tatum, M., Thomas, G.W., Anderson, D.D. (2024). Reconstruction of Bony Anatomy from Sparse Fluoroscopy Sampling Using Neural Radiance Fields. In: Skalli, W., Laporte, S., Benoit, A. (eds) Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering II. CMBBE 2023. Lecture Notes in Computational Vision and Biomechanics, vol 39. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55315-8_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55315-8_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-55314-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-55315-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics