Abstract
The central venous catheter (CVC) is a key tool for patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation. CVC ensures a stable, adequate, and safe venous access. The use of a CVC requires an adequate knowledge and training by health personnel to maintain its functionality and to prevent complications (malfunctioning, partial or complete occlusion, dislodgement, kinking, rupture, thrombosis, and catheter-related bloodstream infections) that can cause the premature removal of CVC or be life-threatening. The choice of CVC must consider the characteristics of the patient, the treatment plan, and the performance expected by the device.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
1 Introduction
The execution of the complex procedure of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) requires a stable and safe venous access. This aim is usually achieved by the insertion of a central venous catheter (CVC). CVC is a key tool to ensure a safe central venous access for multiple purposes (chemotherapy, parenteral nutrition, supportive therapy, hydration, and blood sampling), to reduce the need for repeated, painful venipunctures, and to preserve the peripheral venous asset. The use of CVC is associated with the occurrence of complications (malfunctioning, occlusion, dislodgement, kinking, rupture, thrombosis, and catheter-related bloodstream infections-CRBSI) that can cause its premature removal or be life-threatening for the patient. For this reason, education and continuous training of health personnel are fundamental to preserve the CVC life span from complications. Table 23.1 shows the essential steps of CVC maintenance (Cesaro et al. 2016; Cellini et al. 2022).
CVCs are being designated by:
-
Duration (e.g., temporary or short-term versus permanent or long-term).
-
Site of insertion (e.g., subclavian vein, femoral vein, jugular vein, and basilic vein).
-
Number of lumens (single, double, or triple lumen).
-
Characteristic of tip (open tip or closed tip).
-
Materials to reduce complications (e.g., impregnation with heparin, antibiotics, or silver).
2 Type of CVC Materials
Catheter materials should be biocompatible, kink resistant, inherently chemically resistant, and neutral, biostable, soft, and deformable and should have a high tensile strength (Lim et al. 2018; Crocoli et al. 2022). The most commonly used materials are polyurethane and silicone. Silicone catheters are flexible, chemically stable, and well tolerated. Polyurethane has a superior tensile strength. Non-tunneled, semirigid catheters are usually made of polyurethane, while tunneled catheters are usually made of both silicone and polyurethane (Lim et al. 2018). The choice of a polyurethane or a silicone catheter is debated. Silicone catheters are more prone to material failure as a result of the development of surface irregularities due to loss of barium sulfate molecules and thrombotic occlusion. The introduction of third-generation polyurethane catheters with power-injectable technology, that allows flows up to 5 mL/s and contrast medium injection, made this type of CVC a favorite with many operators (Crocoli et al. 2022).
3 Type of CVC
CVCs are classified in two main categories: tunneled and non-tunneled, according to whether or not they follow a subcutaneous route before accessing the central vein. Non-tunneled catheters are directly inserted into a peripheral or large central vein. Both tunneled and non-tunneled CVCs may have a single or multiple lumen. Tunnelling of CVCs was introduced to reduce the risk of infectious and mechanical (dislodgement) complications, and this type of CVC is ideal for long-term care (Cellini et al. 2022). Non-tunneled CVCs are usually inserted for a short to medium period (from 2–4 weeks to 1–3 months) (Lee and Ramaswamy 2018; Padmanabhan 2018). Tunneled CVCs are in turn classifiable in two subgroups: partially implanted and totally implanted. Partially implanted CVCs are characterized by an external part outside the patient’s body whose extremity (hub) is used to draw blood sampling or to connect the infusion lines, a tunneled subcutaneous part with a Dacron cuff at a few centimeters from the skin entry point, and a final intravenous part with the tip positioned at the border between the superior vena cava and the right atrium. The Dacron cuff stimulates a fibrotic reaction of the subcutaneous tissues over 2–4 weeks ensuring stability and CVC securement. Both cuff and subcutaneous course are fundamental to prevent the CVC from becoming infected due to the migration of external microbes along the CVC.
The tip of CVC can be open or closed: open tip requires the clamping of the external part of CVC when it is not in use to avoid blood backflow with breath or body movements, while closed tip has lateral valves that open as fluid is withdrawn or infused and remain closed when the CVC is not used. The clamping of CVC with open tip is not needed if a neutral pressure needle-free connector is used to prevent blood backflow.
Totally implanted catheters consist of a reservoir (port) placed in a pocket in the subcutaneous tissue, anteriorly on the chest wall, below the clavicle, that is connected to the catheter. This type of CVC preserves the patient’s body image and ensuring almost no limitations on sports activities, and body hygiene. Accessing to this type of CVC needs skin puncture with a special “non-coring” needle (Huber needle or gripper system). In case of frequently accesses, the procedure can be painful or discomforting for the patient, requiring the application of topical skin anesthetic for its prevention. “Non coring” needle does not permit the infusion or the extraction of high volumes making it less suitable for patients requiring high infusion or blood extraction rates. The recent introduction of port models with a modified reservoir chamber (vortex, tidal, power port) has allowed to obtain a higher flow rate suitable for leukapheresis, red blood cell exchange, extracorporeal photopheresis, and therapeutic plasma exchange (Blanco-Guzman 2018; Lim et al. 2018).
The peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) is a CVC inserted into a vein of the arm, usually the basilic or cephalic veins; its tip is advanced through the axillary and subclavian veins up to the cavo-atrial junction (Cornillon et al. 2017). For more information on PICCs, see Chap 32.
4 Venous Access
Central lines are usually inserted through the subclavian, the jugular, or, less frequently, the femoral vein. This last venous access is associated with a higher risk of infectious complications (O’Leary 2016), and it is more commonly used in critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units who require a non-tunneled CVC. It is recommended that the ratio of catheter caliber to vein diameter should not exceed 1/3. Using the subclavian or jugular access, the tip of the catheter has to lie in the superior vena cava, just before the entrance of the right atrium, about 29–55 mm below the level of trachea carina (in adults). The incidence of pneumothorax after CVC insertion is about 1.5–3.1%, and it is higher with subclavian vein catheterization, whereas the risk of hemorrhage and bruise is slightly more common with the jugular venous line access.
In the positioning of a PICC, the incannulation of the basilic vein is preferred to that of the cephalic vein as it has low risk of complications. To minimize the risk of complications due to venous catheterization, the routine use of ultrasound guidance to cannulate the vein is recommended instead of the classical (blind) technique (Crocoli et al. 2015; Crocoli et al. 2022).
A chest X-ray must be performed at the end of the CVC insertion procedure to confirm that the line is positioned inside the superior vena cava, and for the cannulation of subclavian or jugular veins, no pneumothorax was inadvertently caused. Alternatively, the use of intracavitary ECG (electrocardiographic method) is a noninvasive method to evaluate the correct position of the catheter tip.
5 CVC Complications
Catheter-related complications may be classified into infectious (local or systemic) and mechanical (occlusion, rupture, dislodgement, accidental self-removal, and thrombosis) (Cesaro et al. 2009). As the catheter is itself a risk for developing complications, it should be removed as there is no further need for it. Premature CVC removal is indicated in case of mechanical complication with persistent malfunction, CRBSI by Candida spp., Pseudomonas spp., Klebsiella spp., Staphylococcus aureus, persistent bacteria colonization, recurrent CRBSI, or CVC thrombosis.
5.1 Special Measures to Prevent Catheter-Related Infections
The key rules to prevent infections are proper handwashing by the performing provider, the use of aseptic technique over the patient at insertion time, thorough cleaning of the insertion site, and periodic review of the CVC exit site (Cesaro et al. 2016; Cellini et al. 2022). To prevent CRBSI and tunnel or exit-site infection, medication-impregnated dressings with different antimicrobial materials were developed to decrease the production of the biofilm by microorganisms and decrease the adhesion of them to the catheter walls. Impregnating medications may contain chlorhexidine gluconate, silver sulfadiazine, rifampin, and minocycline. Chlorhexidine gluconate is among the most used, by impregnating the whole dressing or applying an impregnated sponge (e.g., Biopatch®) and covered by a transparent polyurethane semipermeable transparent dressing. The efficacy of flushing or locking CVC with an antibiotic solution to prevent infection is debated, and it is associated with the risk of increasing microbial antibiotic resistance; therefore, it is not recommended and it should be reserved to selected cases (van den Bosch et al. 2021).
6 Catheters for Leukapheresis
The procedure of stem cell collection by apheresis is performed both for auto- and allo-HCT to obtain stem cells (O’Leary 2016). As the procedure requires sustained high blood flow rates (50–100 mL/min), an adequate venous access is needed. Peripheral access placed in the basilic, cephalic, brachial, median cubital, and radial veins is recommended. Considering that the placement of a central CVC is associated with potentially life-threatening complications such as pneumothorax, bleeding, and embolism, its use is not recommended for PBSC collection of a healthy volunteer donor. Conversely, in the case of auto-PBSC, if the patient has no adequate peripheral or central venous access, a temporary non-tunneled CVC may be placed in the internal jugular, subclavian, or femoral veins. Catheter removal is performed on donor laboratory values (platelets >50 × 109/L) and after the assessment of an adequate CD34+ dose collection and cryopreservation.
Partially implanted silicone CVCs are often used by pediatric oncologists-hematologists because they are most suitable for long-term complex treatment. In the case of leukapheresis procedure, silicone CVCs are not ideal because they are more prone to collapse during automatic apheresis (Ridyard et al. 2017). On the other hand, the harvesting procedure of peripheral stem cell collection, which requires high blood flow rates and a large needle, may be difficult in children below 10 kg using a temporary peripheral venous access due to the small size of veins (Padmanabhan 2018). In this case, the placement of a short-term CVC made of polyurethane may be needed (Cooling 2017). In younger children, the rigidity of such material and the narrower lumens of the veins may represent a potential risk for thrombosis and infection.
Key Points
CVC indications and insertion | ||
---|---|---|
1. Type of CVC | Tunneled CVCs/port/PICCs | Long-term therapy (months, years) |
Port for intermittent use, tunneled CVC for continuous use | ||
Suitable for inpatient and outpatient | ||
Non-tunneled CVCs | Short-term therapy (2–4 weeks, 1–3 months) | |
Suitable for inpatient | ||
2. Number of lumens | Single lumen vs double lumen | Double lumen in patients undergoing HCT, critically ill patients, intensive intravenous therapy |
3. Insertion | Percutaneous/minimally invasive | Ultrasound guidance recommended |
Adequate training required | ||
Cutdown approach | Very limited indication (premature infants) | |
Experienced operator | ||
4. Material | Silicone | Tunneled CVC |
Polyurethane | Tunneled and non-tunneled CVC |
References
Blanco-Guzman MO. Implanted vascular access device options: a focus review on safety and outcomes. Transfusion. 2018;58:558–68.
van den Bosch CH, van Woensel J, van de Wetering MD. Prophylactic antibiotics for preventing gram-positive infections associated with long-term central venous catheters in adults and children receiving treatment for cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;10:CD003295.
Cellini M, Bergadano A, Crocoli A, Badino C, Carraro F, Sidro L, Botta D, Pancaldi A, Rossetti F, Pitta F, Cesaro S. Guidelines of the Italian Association of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology for the management of the central venous access devices in pediatric patients with onco-hematological disease. J Vasc Access. 2022;23:3–17.
Cesaro S, Tridello G, Cavaliere M, et al. Prospective, randomized trial of two different modalities of flushing central venous catheters in pediatric patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:2059–65.
Cesaro S, Cavaliere M, Pegoraro A, et al. A comprehensive approach to the prevention of central venous catheter complications: results of 10-year prospective surveillance in pediatric hematology-oncology patients. Ann Hematol. 2016;95:817–25.
Cooling L. Procedure-related complications and adverse events associated with pediatric autologous peripheral blood stem cell collection. J Clin Apher. 2017;32:35–48.
Cornillon J, Martignoles JA, Tavernier-Tardy E, et al. Prospective evaluation of systematic use of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC lines) for the home care after allogenic hematopoietic stem cells transplantation. Support Care Cancer. 2017;25:2843–7.
Crocoli A, Tornesello A, Pittiruti M, et al. Central venous access devices in pediatric malignancies: a position paper of Italian Association of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology. J Vasc Access. 2015;16(2):130–6.
Crocoli A, Martucci C, Persano G, et al. Vascular access in pediatric oncology and hematology: state of the art. Children. 2022;9:70.
Lee K, Ramaswamy RS. Intravascular access devices from an interventional radiology perspective: indications, implantation techniques, and optimizing patency. Transfusion. 2018;58(Suppl 1):549–57.
Lim HS, Kim SM, Kang DW. Implantable vascular access devices–past, present and future. Transfusion. 2018;58:545–8.
O’Leary MF. Venous access for hematopoietic progenitor cell collection: an international survey by the ASFA HPC donor subcommittee. J Clin Apher. 2016;31(6):529–34.
Padmanabhan A. Cellular collection by apheresis. Transfusion. 2018;58:598–604.
Ridyard CH, Plumpton CO, Gilbert RE, Hughes DA. Cost-effectiveness of pediatric central venous catheters in the UK: a secondary publication from the CATCH clinical trial. Front Pharmacol. 2017;8:644.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cesaro, S., Caddeo, G. (2024). Vascular Access. In: Sureda, A., Corbacioglu, S., Greco, R., Kröger, N., Carreras, E. (eds) The EBMT Handbook. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44080-9_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44080-9_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-44079-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-44080-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)