Skip to main content

Methods for Automatic Argumentation Structure Prediction

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Data Analytics and Management in Data Intensive Domains (DAMDID/RCDL 2021)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1620))

  • 351 Accesses

Abstract

Argumentation mining is a natural language understanding task consisting of several subtasks: relevance detection, stance classification, argument quality assessment and fact checking. In this work we propose several architectures for the analysis of argumentative texts based on BERT. We also show, that models, which jointly learn argumentation mining subtasks outperform pipelines of models trained on a single tasks. Additionally we explore transfer learning approach based on pretraining for the natural language inference task, which achieves highest score on tasks of argumentation mining among the models trained on english corpora.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.research.ibm.com/haifa/dept/vst/debating_data.shtml.

  2. 2.

    https://github.com/hawkeoni/Argument-structure-prediction.

References

  1. Aharoni, E., et al.: A benchmark dataset for automatic detection of claims and evidence in the context of controversial topics. In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Argumentation Mining, pp. 64–68 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Khatib, K., Wachsmuth, H., Hagen, M., Stein, B., Köhler, J.: Webis-debate-16. Zenodo, January 2016. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3251804

  3. Barrón-Cedeño, A., et al.: Overview of CheckThat! 2020: automatic identification and verification of claims in social media. In: Arampatzis, A., et al. (eds.) CLEF 2020. LNCS, vol. 12260, pp. 215–236. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58219-7_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bowman, S.R., Angeli, G., Potts, C., Manning, C.D.: A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inference. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). Association for Computational Linguistics (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chernodub, A., et al.: TARGER: neural argument mining at your fingertips. In: Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations, pp. 195–200 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cui, L., Cheng, S., Wu, Y., Zhang, Y.: Does BERT solve commonsense task via commonsense knowledge? arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.03945 (2020)

  7. Devlin, J., Chang, M.W., Lee, K., Toutanova, K.: BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805 (2018)

  8. Ein-Dor, L., et al.: Corpus wide argument mining-a working solution. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 34, pp. 7683–7691 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gleize, M., et al.: Are you convinced? Choosing the more convincing evidence with a Siamese network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.08971 (2019)

  10. Gretz, S., et al.: A large-scale dataset for argument quality ranking: construction and analysis. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 34, pp. 7805–7813 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Levy, R., Bogin, B., Gretz, S., Aharonov, R., Slonim, N.: Towards an argumentative content search engine using weak supervision. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 2066–2081 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lippi, M., Torroni, P.: MARGOT: a web server for argumentation mining. Expert Syst. Appl. 65, 292–303 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Reimers, N., Gurevych, I.: Sentence-BERT: sentence embeddings using Siamese BERT-networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.10084 (2019)

  14. Shnarch, E., et al.: Will it blend? Blending weak and strong labeled data in a neural network for argumentation mining. In: Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), pp. 599–605 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stab, C., Miller, T., Gurevych, I.: Cross-topic argument mining from heterogeneous sources using attention-based neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.05758 (2018)

  16. Sun, Z., et al.: Self-explaining structures improve NLP models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.01786 (2020)

  17. Thorne, J., Vlachos, A., Christodoulopoulos, C., Mittal, A.: FEVER: a large-scale dataset for fact extraction and verification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.05355 (2018)

  18. Toledo, A., et al.: Automatic argument quality assessment-new datasets and methods. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.01007 (2019)

  19. Toledo-Ronen, O., Orbach, M., Bilu, Y., Spector, A., Slonim, N.: Multilingual argument mining: datasets and analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.06432 (2020)

  20. Vaswani, A., et al.: Attention is all you need. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 5998–6008 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study is supported by Russian Science Foundation, project 21-71-30003.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ilya Dimov or Boris Dobrov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dimov, I., Dobrov, B. (2022). Methods for Automatic Argumentation Structure Prediction. In: Pozanenko, A., Stupnikov, S., Thalheim, B., Mendez, E., Kiselyova, N. (eds) Data Analytics and Management in Data Intensive Domains. DAMDID/RCDL 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1620. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12285-9_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12285-9_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-12284-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-12285-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics