Abstract
The Tour de France is one of the world’s largest annual sport events. Although cycling races are usually not lucrative, the Tour de France organizer’s balance sheet reveals that the Tour has been profitable since the 1980s. How can this economic success story be explained? Most sport economists are used to turn to tournament theory and a contest’s competitive balance and outcome uncertainty as major reasons for success. However, fans of the Tour de France are seldom surprised by the name of the final winner of the race, usually not even by the riders sharing the podium. Thus, explaining the Tour’s success by competitive balance must be checked carefully. Following the introduction, this chapter shows how the Tour de France has been a successful managerial and economic model: it is a well-designed and well-managed sport event, with a modern financing model which is founded on TV broadcasting rights, like other mega-sport events. Fundamentally, the quality of the show of the Tour seems well explained by tournament theory. However, if one focuses on competitive balance, it appears that the success of the Tour is likely not due to a high competitive balance, but instead holds in spite of static and dynamic competitive imbalance. The conclusion stresses that the increasing economic success of the Tour since the 1980s is likely not caused by more competitive racing, but instead by a better broadcasting of the event.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andreff, W. (1985). Le muscle et la machine: le dialogue entre le sport et l’innovation. Culture Technique, 13, 39–61.
Andreff, W. (2012). Mondialisation économique du sport. Manuel de référence en Economie du sport. De Boeck.
Andreff, W. (2015). The Tour de France: A success story in spite of competitive imbalance and doping. In D. Van Reeth & D. Larson (Eds.), The economics of professional road cycling (pp. 233–255). Springer.
Andreff, W., & Staudohar, P. (2000). The evolving European model of professional sports finance. Journal of Sports Economics, 1(3), 257–276.
ASO. (2019). Règlement du Tour de France 2019. Retrieved from https://netstorage.lequipe.fr/ASO/cycling_tdf/rules-reglement-tour-de-france-2019.pdf
ASO. (2021). Le Tour de France. Guide historique. Retrieved from https://storage-aso.lequipe.fr/ASO/cycling_tdf/guide-historique-2021.pdf
Bačik, V., & Klobučnik, M. (2013). History of Tour de France from the geographical point of view. Sport Science Review, 22(3–4), 255–277.
Bačik, V., Klobučnik, M., & Mignot, J.-F. (2021). What made the tour successful? Competitive balance in the Tour de France, 1947–2017. Sport in Society, 24(2), 147–159.
Buzzacchi, L., Szymanski, S., & Valletti, T. M. (2003). Equality of opportunity and equality of outcome: Open leagues, closed leagues and competitive balance. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 3(3), 167–186.
BVA. (2018). Les préoccupations des Français. Vague 7. Les Français et le Tour de France. Retrieved from https://staticswww.bva-group.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Sondage-BVA-pour-Orange-LesFran%C3%A7ais-et-le-Tour-de-France-Juillet-2018.pdf
Cabaud, B., Scelles, N., François, A., & Morrow, S. (2015). Modeling performances and competitive balance in professional road cycling. In D. Van Reeth & D. Larson (Eds.), The economics of professional road cycling (pp. 257–283). Springer.
Calvet, J. (1981). Le mythe des géants de la route. Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
Candelon, B., & Dupuy, A. (2015). Hierarchical organization and performance inequality: Evidence from professional cycling. International Economic Review, 56(4), 1207–1236.
Desbordes, M. (2006). The economics of cycling. In W. Andreff & S. Szymanski (Eds.), Handbook on the economics of sport (pp. 398–410). Edward Elgar.
Groot, L. (2008). Economics, uncertainty and European football: Trends in competitive balance. Edward Elgar.
Humphreys, B. R., & Watanabe, N. M. (2012). Competitive balance. In L. H. Kahane & S. Shmanske (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of sports economics: The economics of sports (Vol. 1, pp. 18–37). Oxford University Press.
IFOP. (2011). L’intérêt pour le Tour de France en Europe. Résultats détaillés. Retrieved from https://www.ifop.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/1559-1-study_file.pdf
IFOP. (2014). Les Français et le Tour de France de cyclisme. Retrieved from https://www.ifop.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/2723-1-study_file.pdf
Larson, D., & Maxcy, J. (2014). Uncertainty of outcome and radio policy in professional road cycling. Journal of Sport Management, 28, 311–323.
Mignot, J. -F. (2014). Histoire du Tour de France. Repères 637. La Découverte.
Mignot, J.-F. (2016). An economic history of the Tour de France, 1903–2015. In R. Pomfret & J. K. Wilson (Eds.), Sports through the lens of economic history (pp. 55–70). Edward Elgar.
Neale, W. C. (1964). The peculiar economics of professional sports. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 78(1), 1–14.
Rebeggiani, L., & Tondani, D. (2008). Organizational forms in professional cycling: An examination of the efficiency of the UCI Pro Tour. International Journal of Sport Finance, 3(1), 19–41.
Reed, E. (2003). The economics of the tour, 1930–2003. International Journal of the History of Sport, 20(2), 103–127.
Rosen, S. (1986). Prizes and incentives in elimination tournaments. The American Economic Review, 76(4), 701–715.
Rottenberg, S. (1956). The baseball players’ market. Journal of Political Economy, 64(3), 242–258.
Scelles, N., Mignot, J.-F., Cabaud, B., & François, A. (2017). Temporary organizational forms and coopetition in cycling: What makes a breakaway successful in the Tour de France? Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 24(3/4), 122–134.
Szymanski, S. (2003). The economic design of sporting contests. Journal of Economic Literature, XLI(4), 1137–1187.
Szymanski, S. (2006). Uncertainty of outcome, competitive balance and the theory of team sports. In W. Andreff & S. Szymanski (Eds.), Handbook on the economics of sport (pp. 597–600). Edward Elgar.
Tullock, G. (1980). Efficient rent seeking. In J. Buchanan, R. Tollison, & G. Tullock (Eds.), Toward a theory of rent seeking society (pp. 97–112). A&M University Press.
Van Reeth, D. (2013). TV demand for the Tour de France: The importance of stage characteristics versus outcome uncertainty, patriotism and doping. International Journal of Sport Finance, 8(1), 39–60.
Van Reeth, D. (2015a). The future of professional road cycling. In D. Van Reeth & D. Larson (Eds.), The economics of professional road cycling (pp. 313–341). Springer.
Van Reeth, D. (2015b). TV viewing of road cycling races. In D. Van Reeth & D. Larson (Eds.), The economics of professional road cycling (pp. 99–128). Springer.
Van Reeth, D. (2019a). The economics of road cycling. In P. Downward, B. Frick, B. R. Humphreys, T. Pawlowski, J. E. Ruseski, & B. P. Soebbing (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of sports economics (pp. 462–471). Sage Publications.
Van Reeth, D. (2019b). Forecasting Tour de France TV audiences: A multi-country analysis. International Journal of Forecasting, 35, 810–821.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Andreff, W., Mignot, JF. (2022). The Tour de France: A Success Story in Spite of Competitive Imbalance. In: Van Reeth, D. (eds) The Economics of Professional Road Cycling. Sports Economics, Management and Policy, vol 19. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11258-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11258-4_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-11257-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-11258-4
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)