Skip to main content

Cognition Prediction Model for MOOCs Learners Based on ANN

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Human Computer Interaction (IHCI 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13184))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1514 Accesses

Abstract

Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) are becoming in- increasingly popular in recent years. In a virtual world, examining the cognition processes of the students is a real hassle. The primary goal of this study is to examine the influence of MOOCs on learning. This study presents a Cognitive Model based on brain signals for predicting the most effective MOOCs video lecture. In this work, students’ brain signals collected using an Electroencephalogram (EEG) device while watching MOOCs videos are used to classify their level of confusion using a publicly available dataset. The video that causes the least amount of confusion in the majority of students has been chosen as the best. This paper proposes and analyses the Cognitive Model for MOOCs Learning. A Deep Learning-based Artificial Neural Network Model has been created to predict student confusion levels. The methodology has been built using 10K fold cross-validation and shown to be 97% accurate in predicting students’ misunderstandings while watching MOOCs videos. The proposed Cognitive Model will aid in the evaluation of MOOCs course performance.

Varsha T. Lokare—Presently working as an Assistant Professor, Rajarambapu Institute of Technology, Sakharale, Affiliated to Shivaji University, Kolhapur.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Browne, M.W.: Cross-validation methods. J. Math. Psychol. 44(1), 108–132 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Dos Santos, A.I., Punie, Y., Castaño-Muñoz, J.: Opportunities and challenges for the future of MOOCs and open education in Europe. Books to MOOC, pp. 81–91 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gu, R., Yang, Y., Wu, T.: Analysis of MOOC learning effect based on brain cognition research. In: 2020 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC), pp. 5240–5244. IEEE (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gupta, S., Zhang, W., Wang, F.: Model accuracy and runtime tradeoff in distributed deep learning: a systematic study. In: 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), pp. 171–180. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gupta, S., Kumar, P.: Attention recognition system in online learning platform using EEG signals. In: Bora, P.K., Nandi, S., Laskar, S. (eds.) Emerging Technologies for Smart Cities. LNEE, vol. 765, pp. 139–152. Springer, Singapore (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1550-4_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Jadhav, N., Manthalkar, R., Joshi, Y.: Analysis of effect of meditation on cognitive load using higher order crossing features. In: International Conference on Communication and Signal Processing 2016 (ICCASP 2016) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kavitha, S., Mohanavalli, S., Bharathi, B.: Predicting learning behaviour of online course learners’ using hybrid deep learning model. In: 2018 IEEE 6th International Conference on MOOCs, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE), pp. 98–102. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kiwelekar, A.W., Navandar, S., Yadav, D.K.: A two-systems perspective for computational thinking. In: Singh, M., Kang, D.-K., Lee, J.-H., Tiwary, U.S., Singh, D., Chung, W.-Y. (eds.) IHCI 2020. LNCS, vol. 12615, pp. 3–11. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68449-5_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Lin, F.-R., Kao, C.-M.: Mental effort detection using EEG data in e-learning contexts. Comput. Educ. 122, 63–79 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lokare, V.T., Netak, L.D.: Concentration level prediction system for the students based on physiological measures using the EEG device. In: Singh, M., Kang, D.-K., Lee, J.-H., Tiwary, U.S., Singh, D., Chung, W.-Y. (eds.) IHCI 2020. LNCS, vol. 12615, pp. 24–33. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68449-5_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Mayer, R.E., Moreno, R.: Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educ. Psychol. 38(1), 43–52 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ni, Z., Yuksel, A.C., Ni, X., Mandel, M.I., Xie, L.: Confused or not confused? Disentangling brain activity from EEG data using bidirectional LSTM recurrent neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics, pp. 241–246 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Paas, F., Tuovinen, J.E., Tabbers, H., Van Gerven, P.W.: Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educ. Psychol. 38(1), 63–71 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Powell, S., Yuan, L.: MOOCs and open education: implications for higher education (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rolinek, M., Martius, G.: L4: practical loss-based stepsize adaptation for deep learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.05074 (2018)

  16. Sharma, A., Gupta, S., Kaur, S., Kumar, P.: Smart learning system based on EEG signals. In: Singh, M., Gupta, P.K., Tyagi, V., Flusser, J., Ören, T., Kashyap, R. (eds.) ICACDS 2019. CCIS, vol. 1046, pp. 465–476. Springer, Singapore (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9942-8_44

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Sweller, J.: Cognitive load theory. In: Psychology of Learning and Motivation, vol. 55, pp. 37–76. Elsevier (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tahmassebi, A., Gandomi, A.H., Meyer-Baese, A.: An evolutionary online framework for MOOC performance using EEG data. In: 2018 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), pp. 1–8. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, H., Li, Y., Hu, X., Yang, Y., Meng, Z., Chang, K.M.: Using EEG to improve massive open online courses feedback interaction. In: AIED Workshops (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Xu, H., Xu, X.: Megrez: MOOC-oriented EEG-based arousal of brain detection and adjustment scheme. In: 2019 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pp. 1011–1016. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Varsha T. Lokare .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lokare, V.T., Netak, L.D., Jadhav, N.S. (2022). Cognition Prediction Model for MOOCs Learners Based on ANN. In: Kim, JH., Singh, M., Khan, J., Tiwary, U.S., Sur, M., Singh, D. (eds) Intelligent Human Computer Interaction. IHCI 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13184. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98404-5_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98404-5_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-98403-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-98404-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics