Abstract
Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) are becoming in- increasingly popular in recent years. In a virtual world, examining the cognition processes of the students is a real hassle. The primary goal of this study is to examine the influence of MOOCs on learning. This study presents a Cognitive Model based on brain signals for predicting the most effective MOOCs video lecture. In this work, students’ brain signals collected using an Electroencephalogram (EEG) device while watching MOOCs videos are used to classify their level of confusion using a publicly available dataset. The video that causes the least amount of confusion in the majority of students has been chosen as the best. This paper proposes and analyses the Cognitive Model for MOOCs Learning. A Deep Learning-based Artificial Neural Network Model has been created to predict student confusion levels. The methodology has been built using 10K fold cross-validation and shown to be 97% accurate in predicting students’ misunderstandings while watching MOOCs videos. The proposed Cognitive Model will aid in the evaluation of MOOCs course performance.
Varsha T. Lokare—Presently working as an Assistant Professor, Rajarambapu Institute of Technology, Sakharale, Affiliated to Shivaji University, Kolhapur.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Browne, M.W.: Cross-validation methods. J. Math. Psychol. 44(1), 108–132 (2000)
Dos Santos, A.I., Punie, Y., Castaño-Muñoz, J.: Opportunities and challenges for the future of MOOCs and open education in Europe. Books to MOOC, pp. 81–91 (2016)
Gu, R., Yang, Y., Wu, T.: Analysis of MOOC learning effect based on brain cognition research. In: 2020 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC), pp. 5240–5244. IEEE (2020)
Gupta, S., Zhang, W., Wang, F.: Model accuracy and runtime tradeoff in distributed deep learning: a systematic study. In: 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), pp. 171–180. IEEE (2016)
Gupta, S., Kumar, P.: Attention recognition system in online learning platform using EEG signals. In: Bora, P.K., Nandi, S., Laskar, S. (eds.) Emerging Technologies for Smart Cities. LNEE, vol. 765, pp. 139–152. Springer, Singapore (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1550-4_15
Jadhav, N., Manthalkar, R., Joshi, Y.: Analysis of effect of meditation on cognitive load using higher order crossing features. In: International Conference on Communication and Signal Processing 2016 (ICCASP 2016) (2016)
Kavitha, S., Mohanavalli, S., Bharathi, B.: Predicting learning behaviour of online course learners’ using hybrid deep learning model. In: 2018 IEEE 6th International Conference on MOOCs, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE), pp. 98–102. IEEE (2018)
Kiwelekar, A.W., Navandar, S., Yadav, D.K.: A two-systems perspective for computational thinking. In: Singh, M., Kang, D.-K., Lee, J.-H., Tiwary, U.S., Singh, D., Chung, W.-Y. (eds.) IHCI 2020. LNCS, vol. 12615, pp. 3–11. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68449-5_1
Lin, F.-R., Kao, C.-M.: Mental effort detection using EEG data in e-learning contexts. Comput. Educ. 122, 63–79 (2018)
Lokare, V.T., Netak, L.D.: Concentration level prediction system for the students based on physiological measures using the EEG device. In: Singh, M., Kang, D.-K., Lee, J.-H., Tiwary, U.S., Singh, D., Chung, W.-Y. (eds.) IHCI 2020. LNCS, vol. 12615, pp. 24–33. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68449-5_3
Mayer, R.E., Moreno, R.: Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educ. Psychol. 38(1), 43–52 (2003)
Ni, Z., Yuksel, A.C., Ni, X., Mandel, M.I., Xie, L.: Confused or not confused? Disentangling brain activity from EEG data using bidirectional LSTM recurrent neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics, pp. 241–246 (2017)
Paas, F., Tuovinen, J.E., Tabbers, H., Van Gerven, P.W.: Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educ. Psychol. 38(1), 63–71 (2003)
Powell, S., Yuan, L.: MOOCs and open education: implications for higher education (2013)
Rolinek, M., Martius, G.: L4: practical loss-based stepsize adaptation for deep learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.05074 (2018)
Sharma, A., Gupta, S., Kaur, S., Kumar, P.: Smart learning system based on EEG signals. In: Singh, M., Gupta, P.K., Tyagi, V., Flusser, J., Ören, T., Kashyap, R. (eds.) ICACDS 2019. CCIS, vol. 1046, pp. 465–476. Springer, Singapore (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9942-8_44
Sweller, J.: Cognitive load theory. In: Psychology of Learning and Motivation, vol. 55, pp. 37–76. Elsevier (2011)
Tahmassebi, A., Gandomi, A.H., Meyer-Baese, A.: An evolutionary online framework for MOOC performance using EEG data. In: 2018 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), pp. 1–8. IEEE (2018)
Wang, H., Li, Y., Hu, X., Yang, Y., Meng, Z., Chang, K.M.: Using EEG to improve massive open online courses feedback interaction. In: AIED Workshops (2013)
Xu, H., Xu, X.: Megrez: MOOC-oriented EEG-based arousal of brain detection and adjustment scheme. In: 2019 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pp. 1011–1016. IEEE (2019)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lokare, V.T., Netak, L.D., Jadhav, N.S. (2022). Cognition Prediction Model for MOOCs Learners Based on ANN. In: Kim, JH., Singh, M., Khan, J., Tiwary, U.S., Sur, M., Singh, D. (eds) Intelligent Human Computer Interaction. IHCI 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13184. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98404-5_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98404-5_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-98403-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-98404-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)