Skip to main content

Proposal of a Systemic Model for Integration of Strategic Planning in Corporate Level with Balanced Scorecard

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances and Applications in Computer Science, Electronics, and Industrial Engineering (CSEI 2021)

Abstract

A New Model that integrates corporate strategy with the Balanced Scorecard is studied to improve decision-making executives by merging Models Relevant systems, making use of Soft Systems Methodology (SSM), which is based on systems thinking. The research methodology used was action research. This methodology is being applied with very satisfactory results in the generation of new models, as is the case under discussion. Its core is the idea that the researcher does not remain unaware of the research but becomes a participant in the relevant group (diversified firms). In the field, was recorded input and solution models from other authors: the advisor, System Information (SI) staff of corporations, reported investigations and proposals from the maker of researcher? The purpose is to generate a consensus model and confront this model with business reality. The units of analysis considered are international methodologies, knowledge and experience of the investigator, entrepreneurs and researchers, diversified companies, so on. For the testing of the hypothesis was considered: Decision Making of the Head of Admission at the College. The main conclusion was the construction of the New Model, Corporate Strategic Planning and Balanced Scorecard (CSP-BSC), was performed very efficiently from the relevant systems, business requirements and the contributions of the researcher using the SSM, the Philosophical Framework is very important in any investigation because it guides the whole process of research, decreased the percentage of bad decisions, and in-creased the percentage of accuracy of information. It is relevant to corporate and divisional managers, researchers, teachers, and students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Orazbayev B, Ospanov E, Kissikova N, Mukataev N, Orazbayeva K (2017) Decision-making in the fuzzy environment on the basis of various compromise schemes. Procedia Comput Sci 120:945–952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zeinalova LM (2016) Decision making with combined states under interval uncertainty. Procedia Comput Sci 102:223–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Vega Falcón V, Navarro Cejas M, Cejas Martínez MF, Mendoza Velazco DJ (2020) Balanced scorecard: key tool for strategic learning and strengthening in business organization (Cuadro de mando integral: herramienta clave para el aprendizaje estratégico y el fortalecimiento de la organización empresarial). Acad J Interdisc Stud 9:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  4. Alarcon OA, Velastegui HJ, Garcia MV, Gallo CV, Espejo VP, Naranjo JE (2019) Monitoring and control system approach for native threatened species. In: 2019 international conference on information systems and software technologies (ICI2ST), pp 85–91

    Google Scholar 

  5. Llamuca ES, Garcia CA, Naranjo JE, Garcia MV (2019) Cyber-physical production systems for industrial shop-floor integration based on AMQP. In: 2019 International Conference on Information Systems and Software Technologies (ICI2ST), pp 48–54

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nyonawan M, Utama DN (2018) Evaluation of information technology governance in STMIK mikroskil using COBIT 5 framework. In: 2018 international conference on information management and technology (ICIMTech). IEEE, pp 137–142

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brodin M (2017) Security strategies for managing mobile devices in SMEs: a theoretical evaluation. In: 2017 8th international conference on information, intelligence, systems and applications (IISA). IEEE, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pacovilca Alejo GS (2020) El Balance Scorecard y la GestiÓn Educativa EstratÉgica en las Instituciones Educativas del Distrito de Huancavelica 2017. Universidad Nacional de Huancavelica

    Google Scholar 

  9. Diaz Arroyo KE (2011) Propuesta del balance Scorecard desde la perspectiva financiera como soporte de información para la toma de decisiones: Caso de estudio: Empresa Cognitio Consulting SAC, Arequipa, 2018. Universidad Nacional de San Agustín de Arequipa

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vidal Flores D, Domenge MR (2017) Executive flight simulator as a learning tool in new companies’ resource planning based on the balanced scorecard. Contaduría y administración. 62(2):556–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Juiz C, Colomo-Palacios R, Gómez B (2018) Cascading ISO/IEC 38500 based Balanced Score Cards to improve board accountability. Procedia Comput Sci 138:417–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Paredes Larroca F, Saettone Olschewski E, Quino Favero J, Rosales Huamaní J, Castillo Sequera JL (2020) Development of a fuzzy logic-based solar charge controller for charging lead–acid batteries. In: Advances and applications in computer science, electronics and industrial engineering. Springer, Cham, pp 168–183

    Google Scholar 

  13. Saeteros M, Paucar W, Molina C, Caiza G (2020) Development and analysis of a PID controller and a fuzzy PID. In: Advances and applications in computer science, electronics and industrial engineering. Springer, Cham, pp 143–154

    Google Scholar 

  14. Park SH (2016) A strategic approach to policy tasks for the development of Korea’s island areas. J Marine Island Cult 5(1):14–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Winter MG (2016) A strategic approach to debris flow risk reduction on the road network. Procedia Eng 143:759–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Papulova Z, Gazova A (2016) Role of strategic analysis in strategic decision-making. Procedia Econ Finan 39:571–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Volná J, Papula J (2013) Analysis of the behavior of Slovak enterprises in the context of low innovation performance. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci 99:600–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tsai JM, Chien HH, Shih SC, Lee SC, Tsai LY, Tsay SL (2017) Using balanced scorecard on reducing fall incidents and injuries among elderly cancer patients in a medical center in Taiwan. Int J Gerontol 11(4):253–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Houck M, Speaker PJ, Fleming AS, Riley RA Jr (2012) The balanced scorecard: sustainable performance assessment for forensic laboratories. Sci Just 52(4):209–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tubis A, Werbińska-Wojciechowska S (2017) Balanced scorecard use in passenger transport companies performing at Polish market. In: Transbaltica. In: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, vol 10. Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Department of Construction Economics, pp 538–547

    Google Scholar 

  21. D’Arconte C (2018) Business intelligence applied in small size for profit companies. Procedia Comput Sci 131:45–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. DArconte C (2017) CRM, Business intelligence and the impact on companies’ performance. In: TIEM 2017, p 77

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ibarra D, Ganzarain J, Igartua JI (2018) Business model innovation through industry 4.0: a review. Procedia Manuf 22:4–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Li X, Liu F, Li A, Xu L (2018) Business negotiation based on extenics. Procedia Comput Sci 139:521–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chancusig JC, Cruzado JAG (2020) Results validation about the adoption model of information and communication technologies applied to the technical University of Cotopaxi. WSEAS Trans Environ Dev 16:158–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gonzalez-Padron TL, Chabowski BR, Hult GTM, Ketchen DJ Jr (2010) Knowledge management and balanced scorecard outcomes: exploring the importance of interpretation, learning and internationality. Brit J Manag 21(4):967–982

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Supporting provided by the Technical University of Ambato, Research and Development Directorate (DIDE), and Technical University of Cotopaxi.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Carlos Chancusig-Chisag .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cruzado, J.A.G., Chancusig-Chisag, J.C., Lozada, J.V.M., Acuña, A.J.A. (2022). Proposal of a Systemic Model for Integration of Strategic Planning in Corporate Level with Balanced Scorecard. In: Garcia, M.V., Fernández-Peña, F., Gordón-Gallegos, C. (eds) Advances and Applications in Computer Science, Electronics, and Industrial Engineering. CSEI 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 433. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97719-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics