Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Additive Manufacturing as a Digital Design Technology in the Wood-Furniture Sector: Benefits and Barriers to Its Implementation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Digital Transformation in Industry

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation ((LNISO,volume 54))

Abstract

The research analyzes the potential sustainable benefits and barriers to the implementation of Additive Manufacturing in the wood-furniture industry, trying to identify the gaps in perception between “traditional” and “3D companies”, and also to predict which are the main factors that could lead companies to its implementation. It has been administered a questionnaire in 2017, on a sample of 2035 Italian companies in the wood-furniture industry, using simple random sampling, obtaining 234 participants. The Analysis of Variance and binary regression were used to evaluate data collected. The research highlighted how Italian 3D companies are interested for new products and product features showing a propensity to innovation and putting design and made in Italy in the first place. The results underline that the main advantages of using 3D printing are the reduction in time to define technical specifications of products, in time for prototyping and production. For the successful implementation of AM technologies, the decision to adopt them has to be accompanied by a change in jobs and tasks, and thus a change in work practices and structure. The experimental techniques used is the added value of this study: no previous quantitative analysis has been realized on a large sample of furniture companies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Neely, A. (2008). Exploring the financial consequences of the servitisation of manufacturing. Operation Management Research, 1(2), 103–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhou, F., Ji, Y., & Jiao, R. J. (2013). Affective and cognitive design for mass personalization: Status and prospect. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 24, 1047–1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fox, S., & Li, L. (2012). Expanding the scope of prosumption: A framework for analysing potential contributions from advances in materials technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(4), 721–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Seran, S., & Izvercian, M. (2014). Prosumer engagement in innovation strategies: The prosumer creativity and focus model. Management Decision, 52(10), 1968–1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Araújo, R., Santos, G., da Costa, J. B., & Sá, J. C. (2019). The quality management system as a driver of organizational culture: An empirical study in the Portuguese textile industry. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 23(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Costa, A. R., Barbosa, C., Santos, G., & Rui Alves, M. (2019). Six sigma: Main metrics and r based software for training purposes and practical industrial quality control. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 23(2), 83–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Barbosa, L. C. F. M., de Oliveira, O. J., & Santos, G. (2018). Proposition for the alignment of the integrated management system (quality, environmental and safety) with the business strategy. International Journal for Quality Research, 12(4), 925–940.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Talapatra, S., Santos, G., Uddin, K., & Carvalho, F. (2019). Main benefits of integrated management systems through literature review. International Journal for Quality Research, 13(4), 1037–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Santos, G., Rebelo, M., Barros, S., Silva, R., Pereira, M., & Lopes, N. (2014). Developments regarding the integration of the occupational safety and health with quality and environment management systems. In Kavouras, I. G. & Chalbot, M. C. G. (Eds.), Occupational safety and health (pp. 113–146). New York: Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carvalho, F., Santos, G., & Gonçalves, J. (2019). Critical analysis of information about integrated management systems and environmental policy on the Portuguese firms’ website, towards sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Doiro, M., Fernández, F. J., Félix, M., & Santos, G. (2017). ERP-machining centre integration: A modular kitchen production case study. Procedia Manufacturing, 13, 1159–1166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Doiro, M., Fernández, F. J., Félix, M. J., & Santos, G. (2019). Machining operations for components in kitchen furniture: A comparison between two management systems. Procedia Manufacturing, 41, 10–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Santos, G., Murmura, F., & Bravi, L. (2018). Fabrication laboratories—the development of new business models with new digital technologies. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 29(8), 1332–1357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bravi, L., Murmura, F., & Santos, G. (2018). Manufacturing labs: Where new digital technologies help improve life quality. International Journal for Quality Research, 12(4), 957–974.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Azevedo, J., Sá, J. C., Ferreira, L. P., Santos, G., Cruz, F. M., Jimenez, G., & Silva, F. J. G. (2019). Improvement of production line in the automotive industry through lean philosophy. Procedia Manufacturing, 41, 1023–1030.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ribeiro, P., Sá, J. C., Ferreira, L. P., Silva, F. J. G., Pereira, M. T., & Santos, G. (2019). The impact of the application of lean tools for improvement of process in a plastic company: A case study. Procedia Manufacturing, 38, 765–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rodrigues, J., de Sá, J. C. V., Ferreira, L. P., Silva, F. J. G., & Santos, G. (2019). Lean management “quick-wins”: Results of implementation. A case study. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 23(3), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mellor, S., Hao, L., & Zhang, D. (2014). Additive manufacturing: A framework for implementation. International Journal of Production Economics, 149, 194–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Faludi, J., Bayley, C., Bhogal, S., & Iribarne, M. (2015). Comparing environmental impacts of additive manufacturing vs traditional machining via life-cycle assessment. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 21(1), 14–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gebler, M., Schoot Uiterkamp, A. J. M., & Visser, C. (2014). A global sustainability perspective on 3D printing technologies. Energy Policy, 74(C), 158–167.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gershenfeld, N. (2012). How to make almost anything—The digital fabrication revolution. Foreign Affairs, 91(6), 43–57.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rayna, T., & Striukova, L. (2016). From rapid prototyping to home fabrication: How 3D printing is changing business model innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 102, 214–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Reeves, P. (2009). Additive manufacturing—A supply chain wide response to economic uncertainty and environmental sustainability. Crown Yard, Wirksworth, Derbyshire, DE4 4ET, UK: Econolyst Limited, The Silversmiths.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hague, R., Mansour, S., & Saleh, N. (2004). Material and design considerations for rapid manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research, 42(22), 4691–4708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kulkarni, P., Marsan, A., & Dutta, D. (2000). A review of process planning techniques in layered manufacturing. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 6(1), 18–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Stavytskyy, A., Kharlamova, G., Giedraitis, V., & Sengul, E. C. (2019). Gravity model analysis of globalization process in transition economies. Journal of International Studies, 12(2), 322–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chiarini, A., Belvedere, V., & Grando A., (2020). Industry 4.0 strategies and technological developments. An exploratory research from Italian manufacturing companies. Production Planning & Control, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Murmura, F., & Bravi, L. (2018). Additive manufacturing in the wood-furniture sector: Sustainability of the technology, benefits and limitations of adoption. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 29(2), 350–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. GreenItaly (2016). I quaderni di Symbolia. Una risposta alla crisi, una sfida per il futuro. [The Symbolia notebooks. A response to the crisis, a challenge for the future]. Available at www.unioncamere.gov.it/download/6142.html

  30. Félix, M. J., Santos, G., Simões, R., & Silva, J. R. (2020). Practice-based design research knowledge production for quality assurance in design. International Journal for Quality Research, 14(2), 647–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Longhitano, G. A., Nunes, G. B., Candido, G., & da Silva, J. V. L. (2020). The role of 3D printing during COVID-19 pandemic: A review. Progress in Additive Manufacturing, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Arora, P. K., Arora, R., Haleem, A., & Kumar, H. (2020). Application of additive manufacturing in challenges posed by COVID-19. Materials Today: Proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ford, S., & Despeisse, M. (2016). Additive manufacturing and sustainability: An exploratory study of the advantages and challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 1573–1587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Fatorachian, H., & Kazemi, H. (2018). A critical investigation of Industry 4.0 in manufacturing: Theoretical operationalisation framework. Production Planning & Control, 29(8), 633–644.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Campbell, T., Williams, C., Ivanova, O., & Garrett, B. (2011). Could 3D Printing Change the World? Technologies, and Implications of Additive Manufacturing, Washington DC/USA: Atlantic Council.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Petrovic, V., Gonzales, J. V. H., Ferrado, O. J., Gordillo, D., Puchades, J. R. B., & Ginan, L. P. (2011). Additive layered manufacturing: Sectors of industrial application shown through case studies. International Journal of Production Research, 49(4), 1071–1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Fatorachian, H., & Kazemi, H. (2020). Impact of Industry 4.0 on supply chain performance. Production Planning & Control, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Douglas, S. T., & Stanley, W. G. (2014). Costs and cost effectiveness of additive manufacturing. NIST Special Publication, 1176, 1–89.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Neef, A., Klaus, B., & Stefan, K. (2005). Vom personal computer zum personal fabricator [from personal computer to personal fabricator]. Murmann Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Chłodnicki, M., & Zieliński, M. (2009). Creating value by designing: Economic and business perspectives. Journal of International Studies, 2(1), 89–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Huang, S. H., Liu, P., & Mokasdar, A. (2013). Additive manufacturing and its societal impact: A literature review. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 67, 1191–1203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Holmström, J., Liotta, G., & Chaudhuri, A. (2017). Sustainability outcomes through direct digital manufacturing-based operational practices: A design theory approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 167, 951–961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Victor, V., Thoppan, J. J., Fekete-Farkas, M., & Grabara, J. (2019). Pricing strategies in the era of digitalisation and the perceived shift in consumer behaviour of youth in Poland. Journal of International Studies, 12(3), 74–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Irwandi, S. A., & Pamungkas, I. D. (2020). Determinants of financial reporting quality: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of International Studies, 13(2), 25–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Africano, N., Rodrigues, A. S., & Santos, G. (2019). The main benefits of the implementation of the quality management system in higher education institutions in Angola. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 23(3), 122–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Jimenez, G., Santos, G., Sá, J. C., Ricardo, S., Pulido, J., Pizarro, A., & Hernández, H. (2019). Improvement of productivity and quality in the value chain through lean manufacturing—A case study. Procedia Manufacturing, 41, 882–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Baumers, M., Tuck, C., Wildman, R., Ashcroft, I., Rosamond, E., & Hague, R. (2012). Combined build-time, energy consumption and cost estimation for direct metal laser sintering. In Proceedings of twenty third annual international solid freeform fabrication symposium—An additive manufacturing conference (Vol. 13, pp. 1–13).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Pearce, J. M., Blair, C. M., Laciak, K. J., Andrews, R., Nosrat, A., & Zelenika-Zovko, I. (2010). 3-D printing of open-source appropriate technologie for self-directed sustainable development. Journal of Sustainable Development, 3(4), 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Hopkinson, N., Hague, R. J. M., & Dickens, P. M. (2006). Rapid manufacturing. An industrial revolution for the digital age, Chischester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Baumers, M., Beltrametti, L., Gasparre, A., & Hague, R. (2017). Informing additive manufacturing technology adoption: Total cost and the impact of capacity utilization. International Journal of Production Research, 55(23), 6957–6970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Bibby, L., & Dehe, B. (2018). Defining and assessing industry 4.0 maturity levels—case of the defence sector. Production Planning & Control, 29(12), 1030–1043.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Saberi, S., Yusuff, R. M., Zulkifli, N., & Ahmad, M. M. H. M. (2010). Effective factors on advanced manufacturing technology implementation performance: A review. Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(13), 1229–1242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Calabrese, A., Levialdi Ghiron, N., & Tiburzi, L. (2020). Evolutions’ and ‘revolutions’ in manufacturers’ implementation of industry 4.0: A literature review, a multiple case study, and a conceptual framework. Production Planning & Control, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Tino, R., Moore, R., Antoline, S., Ravi, P., Wake, N., Ionita, C. N., Morris, J. M. Summer J. D., Sheikh, A. Rybicki, F. J., & Chepelev, L. L. (2020). COVID-19 and the role of 3D printing in medicine. 3D Printing in Medicine, 6(11), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Choong, Y. Y. C., Tan, H. W., Patel, D. C., Choong, W. T. N., Chen, C. H., Low, H. Y., Tan, M. J., Patel, C. D., & Chua, C. K. (2020). The global rise of 3D printing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature Reviews Materials, 5(9), 637–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Malhotra, M. K., & Grover, V. (1998). An assessment of survey research in POM: From constructs to theory. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 407–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (McGraw-Hill Series in Psychology) (Vol. 3). McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Markowski, C. A., & Markowski, E. P. (1990). Conditions for the effectiveness of a preliminary test of variance. The American Statistician, 44(4), 322–326.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Tian, C. H. E. N., Manfei, X. U., Justin, T. U., Hongyue, W. A. N. G., & Xiaohui, N. I. U. (2018). Relationship between omnibus and post-hoc tests: An investigation of performance of the F test in ANOVA. Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry, 30(1), 60.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Hoetker, G. (2007). The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues. Strategic Management Journal, 28(4), 331–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Tamulevičienė, D., Tvaronavičienė, M., & Mackevičius, J. (2020). Methodology of complex analysis of production cost in manufacturing enterprises. Journal of International Studies, 13(4), 128–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Rusconi, G. (2015). Why 3D printing. Industry 4.0, fourth industrial evolution, digital manufacturing, factory of the future: all concepts that have a foundation also rooted in Italy. Nova, Il Sole 24 Ore, 28 June 2015. Available at http://nova.ilsole24ore.com/esperienze/perche-la-stampa-3d/?refresh_ce=1

  64. Federici, T. (2009). Factors influencing ERP outcomes in SMEs: A post-introduction assessment. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 22(1–2), 81–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Richardson, M., & Haylock, B. (2012). Designer/maker: The rise of additive manufacturing, domestic-scale production and the possible implications for the automotive industry. Computer-Aided Design & Applications PACE, 2, 33–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Kothman, I., & Faber, N. (2016). How 3D printing technology changes the rules of the game: Insights from the construction sector. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 27(7), 932–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Braja, M., & Gemzik-Salwach, A. (2020). Competitiveness of high-tech exports in the EU countries. Journal of International Studies, 13(1), 359–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Cagliano, R., & Spina, G. (2003). Advanced manufacturing technologies and strategically flexible production. Journal of Operations Management, 18(2), 169–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Mishra, A. A., & Shah, R. (2009). In union lies strength: Collaborative competence in new product development and its performance effects. Journal of Operations Management, 27(4), 24–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Vickery, S. K., Dröge, C., & Markland, R. E. (1997). Dimensions of manufacturing strength in the furniture industry. Journal of Operations Management, 15(4), 317–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, Society, Politics, Carlo Bo University of Urbino, 61029, Urbino, Italy

    Laura Bravi & Federica Murmura

  2. School of Design, Campos do IPCA, Barcelos, Portugal

    Gilberto Santos

Authors
  1. Laura Bravi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Federica Murmura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gilberto Santos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Bravi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK

    Vikas Kumar

  2. State Key Laboratory of Precision Electronic Manufacturing Technology and Equipment, School of Mechanical Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, China

    Jiewu Leng

  3. Department of Regional Industrial Policy and Economic Security, Institute of Economics, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ekaterinburg, Russia

    Victoria Akberdina

  4. Department of Regional Industrial Policy and Economic Security, Institute of Economics, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ekaterinburg, Russia

    Evgeny Kuzmin

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bravi, L., Murmura, F., Santos, G. (2022). Additive Manufacturing as a Digital Design Technology in the Wood-Furniture Sector: Benefits and Barriers to Its Implementation. In: Kumar, V., Leng, J., Akberdina, V., Kuzmin, E. (eds) Digital Transformation in Industry . Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 54. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94617-3_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation