Abstract
Previous work in the social sciences, psychology and linguistics has show that liars have some control over the content of their stories, however their underlying state of mind may “leak out” through the way that they tell them. To the best of our knowledge, no previous systematic effort exists in order to describe and model deception language for Brazilian Portuguese. To fill this important gap, we carry out an initial empirical linguistic study on false statements in Brazilian news. We methodically analyze linguistic features using the Fake.Br corpus, which includes both fake and true news. The results show that they present substantial lexical, syntactic and semantic variations, as well as punctuation and emotion distinctions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
The typed dependency manual in available at https://nlp.stanford.edu/software/dependencies_manual.pdf.
References
Adams, S.H.: Statement analysis: what do suspects’ words really reveal? FBI Law Enforcement Bull. 1(1), 12–20 (1996)
Augustine, S.: Lying. In: Deferrari, R.J. (ed.) Treatises on Various Subjects (The Fathers of the Church, vol. 16, pp. 47–110. Catholic University of America Press (1952)
Bok, S.: Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life (1978)
Carver, C.S., Scheier, M.F.: Attention and Self-Regulation: A Control-Theory Approach to Human Behavior. Springer, Heidelberg (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5887-2
Conroy, N.J., Rubin, V.L., Chen, Y.: Automatic deception detection: methods for finding fake news. In: Proceedings of the 78th ASIS&T Annual Meeting: Information Science with Impact: Research in and for the Community. American Society for Information Science, USA (2015)
Conroy, N.J., Rubin, V.L., Chen, Y.: Automatic deception detection: methods for finding fake news. In: Proceedings of the 78th ASIS&T Annual Meeting: Information Science with Impact: Research in and for the Community, ASIST 2015, pp. 82:1–82:4. American Society for Information Science, Silver Springs (2015)
Cristani, M., Roffo, G., Segalin, C., Bazzani, L., Vinciarelli, A., Murino, V.: Conversationally-inspired stylometric features for authorship attribution in instant messaging. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 1121–1124. ACM, New York (2012)
Davis, D., Brock, T.: Use of first person pronouns as a function of increased objective self-awareness. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 11, 381–388 (1975)
DePaulo, B., Lindsay, J.J., Malone, B., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., Cooper, H.: Cues to deception. Psychol. Bull. 129, 74–118 (2003)
Duval, S., Wicklund, R.A.: A Theory of Objective Self Awareness, 1st edn. Academic Press, Oxford (1972)
Fallis, D.: What is lying? J. Philos. 106(1), 29–56 (2009)
Feng, V.W., Hirst, G.: Detecting deceptive opinions with profile compatibility. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, pp. 338–346. Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing, Nagoya (2013)
Finney, K.L.: Detecting deception through RST: a case study of the Casey Anthony trial. In: Proceedings of the 31st Annual North West Linguistics Conference, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 12–23 (2015)
Friedman, H.S., Tucker, J.S.: Language and deception. In: Robinson, G.W.P. (ed.) Handbook of Language and Social Psychology, 1 edn, pp. 257–270. Wiley (1990)
Galasińki, D.: The Language of Deception: A Discourse Analytical Study. SAGE Knowledge, SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks (2000)
Jurafsky, D., Martin, J.H.: Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition. Prentice Hall Series in Artificial Intelligence, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall/Pearson Education International, Hoboken (2009)
Jurafsky, D., Ranganath, R., McFarland, D.: Extracting social meaning: identifying interactional style in spoken conversation. In: Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, NAACL ’09, pp. 638–646. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2009)
Kupfer, J.: The moral presumption against lying. Rev. Metaphys. 36(1), 103–126 (1982)
Mann, S., Vrij, A.: Telling and detecting lies in a high-stake situation: the case of a convicted murderer. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 15(2), 187–203 (2001)
Mann, W.C., Thompson, S.A.: Rhetorical Structure Theory: A Theory Of Text Organization (1987)
Meibauer, J.: The linguistics of lying. Ann. Rev. Linguist. 4(1), 357–375 (2018)
Meibauer, J., Dynel, M.: Empirical approaches to lying and deception. Int. Rev. Pragmatics 8(3)
Monteiro, R.A., Santos, R.L.S., Pardo, T.A.S., de Almeida, T.A., Ruiz, E.E.S., Vale, O.A., et al.: Contributions to the study of fake news in Portuguese: new corpus and automatic detection results. In: Villavicencio, A. (ed.) PROPOR 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11122, pp. 324–334. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99722-3_33
Nahari, G., et al.: ‘Language of lies’: urgent issues and prospects in verbal lie detection research. Legal Criminol. Psychol. 24, 1–23 (2019)
Newman, M.L., Pennebaker, J.W., Berry, D.S., Richards, J.M.: Lying words: Predicting deception from linguistic styles. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 29(5), 665–675 (2003)
Nivre, J., et al.: Universal dependencies v1: a multilingual treebank collection. In: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’16), pp. 1659–1666. European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Portorož (2016)
Ott, M., Choi, Y., Cardie, C., Hancock, J.T.: Finding deceptive opinion spam by any stretch of the imagination. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp. 309–319. Association for Computational Linguistics, Portland (2011)
Padilla Cruz, M.: Might interjections encode concepts? More questions than answers. Lodz Papers Pragmatics 5, 241–270 (2009)
Pasqualotti, P.R.: Reconhecimento de expressões de emoções na interação mediada por computador. Master’s thesis, Porto Alegre, Brasil (2008)
Pennycook, G., Rand, D.: Why do people fall for fake news? New York Times Ed. 1, 1–12 (2019)
Rubin, V.L.: Deception detection and rumor debunking for social media. In: The SAGE Handbook of Social Media Research Methods (2017)
Rubin, V.L., Chen, Y., Conroy, N.J.: Deception detection for news: Three types of fakes. In: Proceedings of the 78th ASIS&T Annual Meeting: Information Science with Impact: Research in and for the Community, ASIST ’15, pp. 83:1–83:4. American Society for Information Science, Silver Springs (2015)
Silva, M.J., Carvalho, P., Sarmento, L.: Building a sentiment lexicon for social judgement mining. In: Caseli, H., Villavicencio, A., Teixeira, A., Perdigão, F. (eds.) PROPOR 2012. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7243, pp. 218–228. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28885-2_25
Silva, R.M., Santos, R.L., Almeida, T.A., Pardo, T.A.: Towards automatically filtering fake news in Portuguese. Expert Syst. Appl. 146, 1–14 (2020)
Vargas, F.A., Pardo, T.A.S., et al.: Aspect clustering methods for sentiment analysis. In: Villavicencio, A. (ed.) PROPOR 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11122, pp. 365–374. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99722-3_37
Vorauer, J.D., Ross, M.E.: Self-awareness and feeling transparent: failing to suppress one’s self. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 35(5), 415–440 (1999)
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., Aral, S.: The spread of true and false news online. Science 359, 1146–1151 (2018)
Williams, B.: Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy (2002)
Ye, S., Chua, T.S.: Learning object models from semistructured web documents, 18(3), 334–349 (2006)
Zimmermann, T.F.: Model-theoretic semantics. In: von Heusinger, K., Portner, P. (ed.) Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, 1 edn, pp. 762–802. de GruyterTo the best of our knowledge, Berlin (2011)
Zipitria, I., Sierra, B., Sopena-Garaikoetxea, I.: Emotion in deceptive language. In: Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2017, London, UK, 16–29 July 2017 (2017)
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to CAPES and USP Research Office (PRP 668) for supporting this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Vargas, F.A., Pardo, T.A.S. (2021). Studying Dishonest Intentions in Brazilian Portuguese Texts. In: Sarkadi, S., Wright, B., Masters, P., McBurney, P. (eds) Deceptive AI. DeceptECAI DeceptAI 2020 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1296. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91779-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91779-1_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-91778-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-91779-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)