Abstract
Simulators are widely used in training aircrew and seafarers as they provide a safer and more affordable alternative to training in an operational environment. In this study, a systematic literature review is conducted to review their usage in air, sea, rail, and road transportation, though the information available on rail simulation is extremely limited, despite it being a vital means to transport passengers and cargo globally. With tools such as VOSviewer and CiteSpace, it is possible to identify articles with the most impact and highest relevance to simulation training. Studies show that training effectiveness is affected by both the equipment and instruction quality. Fidelity – a simulator’s ability to replicate the real world – of the equipment determines what levels of training can be achieved, and its ability to enable the suspension of disbelief directly contribute to the students’ success. Instructors must also facilitate positive training transfer by attaining the best performance possible from the student and provide them with scenarios representative of actual conditions. Effective crew training and proper human-computer interface design are critical for accident mitigation, as the increased system complexity can take away the crew’s attention and overload training needs. Despite their popularity in air and sea transportation, simulator training for land transportation is extremely underutilized. Cost and fidelity are the primary hurdles it must overcome to achieve popularity for rail and road transportation, and further studies are required to determine its effectiveness in reducing the accident rate of novice drivers.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Myers, P., Starr, A.W., Mullins, K.: Flight simulator fidelity, training transfer, and the role of instructors in optimizing learning. Int. J. Aviat. Aeronaut. Aerospace. 5, 1–27 (2018)
Sellberg, C.: Simulators in bridge operations training and assessment: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis. WMU J. Maritime Affairs 16(2), 247–263 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-016-0114-8
Affane Aji, C.: NSF award # 1614249 - fly high your math and science skills. https://nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1614249
Goetsch, D.L.: Safety and health training. In: Occupational Safety and Health for Technologists, Engineers, and Managers, pp. 259–287. Pearson, New York, NY (2019)
Brauer, R.L.: Procedures, rules, and training. In: Safety and Health for Engineers, pp. 449–460. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ (2016)
Marsh, A.K.: ABCs of simulators - a tangled web we weave. https://www.aopa.org/news-and-media/all-news/2011/may/01/abcs-of-simulators
Federal Aviation Administration: Use of a flight simulator and flight training device. 14 C.F.R. § 61.64. (2021)
Federal Aviation Administration: FAA approval of basic aviation training devices (BATD) and advanced aviation training devices (AATD). Advisory Circular, pp. 61–136. (2008)
Templeton, M.: Purdue aviation adds full flight simulator to suite of training devices. https://polytechnic.purdue.edu/newsroom/purdue-aviation-adds-full-flight-simulator-suite-of-training-devices
Wärtsilä Voyage Solutions: Engine Room Simulator. https://cdn.wartsila.com/docs/default-source/product-files/optimise/simulation-and-training/engine-room-simulator-brochure.pdf?sfvrsn=3477cf44_6
Naweed, A.: Simulator integration in the rail industry: the Robocop problem. Proc. Instit. Mech. Eng. Part F J. Rail Rapid Trans. 227(5), 407–418 (2013)
Caro, P.W.: The relationship between flight simulator motion and training requirements. Human Factors J. Human Factors Ergon. Soc. 21(4), 493–501 (1979)
National Transportation Safety Board: In-Flight Separation of Vertical Stabilizer, American Airlines Flight 587, Airbus Industrie A300–605R, N14053, Belle Harbor, New York, November 12, 2001 U.S. Government Washington, DC (2004)
SKYbrary: Line oriented flight training. https://www.skybrary.aero/index.php/Line_Oriented_Flight_Training
Nazir, S., Jungefeldt, S., Sharma, A.: Maritime simulator training across Europe: a comparative study. WMU J. Maritime Affair 18(1), 197–224 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-018-0157-0
Jensen, S., Lützen, M., Mikkelsen, L.L., Rasmussen, H.B., Pedersen, P.V., Schamby, P.: Energy-efficient operational training in a ship bridge simulator. J. Clean. Prod. 171, 175–183 (2018)
Lawlor, M.: Simulation makes the virtual a reality. https://www.afcea.org/content/simulation-makes-virtual-reality
Tichon, J.G.: The use of expert knowledge in the development of simulations for train driver training. Cogn. Technol. Work 9(4), 177–187 (2006)
Casutt, G., Theill, N., Martin, M., Keller, M., Jäncke, L.: The drive-wise project: driving simulator training increases real driving performance in healthy older drivers. Front. Aging Neurosci. 6, 1–14 (2014)
Couture, M., Vincent, C., Gélinas, I., Routhier, F.: Advantages of training with an adaptive driving device on a driving simulator compared to training only on the road. Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. 16(3), 309–316 (2019)
Martín-delosReyes, L.M., et al.: Efficacy of training with driving simulators in improving safety in young novice or learner drivers: a systematic review. Transport. Res. F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 62, 58–65 (2019)
Fisher, D.L., Pollatsek, A.P., Pradhan, A.: Can novice drivers be trained to scan for information that will reduce their likelihood of a crash? Injury. Prevent. 12(Suppl. 1), i25–i29 (2006)
National Transportation Safety Board: Descent Below Visual Glidepath and Impact with Seawall, Asiana Airlines Flight 214, Boeing 777–200ER, HL7742, San Francisco, California, July 6, 2013 U.S. Government Washington, DC (2014)
Avionics Systems Harmonization Working Group: Low Energy Alerting - Proposed Requirements for Context-Dependent Low Energy Alerting Systems for Airplanes Engaged in Commercial Operations U.S. Government Washington, DC (2021)
National Transportation Safety Board: Collision Between US Navy Destroyer John S. McCain and Tanker Alnic MC, Singapore Strait, 5 Miles Northeast of Horsburgh Lighthouse, August 21, 2017. U.S. Government, Washington, DC (2019)
Eckstein, M.: Navy reverting DDGs back to physical throttles, after fleet rejects touchscreen controls. https://news.usni.org/2019/08/09/navy-reverting-ddgs-back-to-physical-throttles-after-fleet-rejects-touchscreen-controls
Shi, Y., Ouyang, D.: Usability evaluation of the flight simulator’s human-computer interaction. In: Huang, D.S., Jo, K.-H. (eds.) ICIC 2016. LNCS, vol. 9772, pp. 693–702. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42294-7_62
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lee, S.C., Duffy, V.G. (2021). Use of Simulation Technology in Transportation Training: A Systematic Literature Review. In: Stephanidis, C., et al. HCI International 2021 - Late Breaking Papers: HCI Applications in Health, Transport, and Industry. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13097. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90966-6_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90966-6_37
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-90965-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-90966-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)