Skip to main content

Changes of Multiple Object Tracking Performance in a 15 Days’ - 6° Head-Down Tilt Bed Rest Experiment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI International 2021 - Late Breaking Posters (HCII 2021)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1499))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1855 Accesses

Abstract

Human-computer interface (HCI) design should fully consider the basic human visual ability including multiple object tracking (MOT). A MOT test was conducted in a 15 days’ - 6° head-down tilt bed rest (HDTBR) experiment to investigate effect of weightlessness environment on MOT performance. During 15 days’ HDTBR, subjects were asked to stay in bed and hold the specific postural all the time even when they were being tested, taking meals and relieving themselves. A computer program which lasted for about 25 min to measure the MOT performance was used. MOT performance was represented by the selection accuracy. MRM ANOVA results showed that the main effect of the number of target balls was significant (P < 0.001) and the main effect of test time was significant (P = 0.002). Back testing of paired test showed that the selection accuracy of 4 target balls (79.324 ± 3.147) was higher than selection accuracy of 5 target balls (70.918 ± 3.175) and selection accuracy of 6 target balls (66.118 ± 2.715) significantly (P < 0.001). Also the selection accuracy of 5 target balls was higher than selection accuracy of 6 target balls significantly (P = 0.002). The above results means that when the number of tracking targets is from 4 to 6, the smaller the number to be tracked, the higher the tracking performance. In addition, selection accuracy after 13 days’ HDTBR (75.840 ± 3.113) was highest than others and was higher than selection accuracy at one day before HDTBR (68.857 ± 2.602) and 3 days’ HDTBR (71.206 ± 2.351) significantly (P = 0.008, P = 0.043), which means best tracking performance appeared after head down tilt bed rest 13 days in the experiment. The weightlessness environment may improve the performance of MOT by some mechanism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Allen, R., McGeorge, P., Pearson, D., Milne, A.B.: Attention and expertise in multiple target tracking. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 18(3), 337–347 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Heaton, K.J., Maule, A.L., Maruta, J., Kryskow, E.M., Ghajar, J.: Attention and visual tracking degradation during acute sleep deprivation in a military sample. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 85(5), 497–503 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu, T.W., Chen, W.F., Liu, C.H., Fu, X.L.: Benefits and costs of uniqueness in multiple object tracking: the role of object complexity. Vision. Res. 66, 31–38 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pylyshyn, Z.W., Storm, R.W.: Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spat. Vis. 3(3), 179–197 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Taibbi, G., Cromwell, R.L., Zanello, S.B., Yarbough, P.O., Vizzeri, G.: Evaluation of ocular outcomes in two 14-day bed rest studies. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 53(14), 4903 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Thomas, L.E., Seiffert, A.E.: Self-motion impairs multiple-object tracking. Cognition 117(1), 80–86 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Thomas, L.E., Seiffert, A.E.: How many objects are you worth? Quantification of the self-motion load on multiple object tracking. Front. Psychol. 2(245), 1–5 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Foundation of National Key Laboratory of Human Factors Engineering (SYFD160051801).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Yu, H., Jiang, T., Zhou, B., Wang, C. (2021). Changes of Multiple Object Tracking Performance in a 15 Days’ - 6° Head-Down Tilt Bed Rest Experiment. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S. (eds) HCI International 2021 - Late Breaking Posters. HCII 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1499. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90179-0_74

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90179-0_74

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-90178-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-90179-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics