Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ideating for Co-designing with Blind and Visually Impaired Users:

Exploring Possibilities for Designing User-Centered Healthcare Information in Pandemic Conditions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI International 2021 - Late Breaking Posters (HCII 2021)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1499))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1949 Accesses

Abstract

Access to information about the pandemic has been a major invisible barrier for people with visual impairments. As governments around the globe rush to distribute guidelines for the prevention of COVID-19 infections, the websites neglected to follow accessibility standards; thus, leaving out millions of users. Similar problems have been reported in acquiring information about medical help, such as locations for getting tested for COVID and even information about hospitals that accepted infected patients. On the other hand, digital-economy based rideshare services in many cases refused blind passengers, particularly if their destination was a medical facility. This problem has particularly been aggravated due to the absence of an easy-to-use, accessible reporting mechanism for the denial of such services by individual drivers. Those of us who have worked side by side with blind colleagues as participants in our design work, or as co-designers, are not unfamiliar with expressions of serious concern about the availability of information and reliability of technological infrastructure. Life for a majority of blind people, users, designers, academics, and citizens, was always unpredictable and it is definitely so in these pandemic times. This late-breaking poster paper presents the preliminary results of an in-progress survey of blind and low vision users in the United States which gauges the accessibility of healthcare information and related services during this pandemic. The results thus far reveal major identifiable access barriers to healthcare information on websites, HCI issues with telemedicine, information and reservation process about accessing COVID-19 vaccine sites, and digitally-dependent transportation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gubert, L.C., da Costa, C.A., Righi, R.: Context awareness in healthcare: a systematic literature review. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 19(2), 245–259 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-019-00664-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Negrini, S., et al.: Telemedicine from research to practice during the pandemic. “Instant paper from the field” on rehabilitation answers to the Covid-19 emergency. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 56(3), 327–330 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jercich, K.: Telehealth may worsen digital divide for people with disabilities. https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/telehealth-may-worsen-digital-divide-people-disabilities, Accessed 21 June 2021

  4. Campbell, V.A., Gilyard, J.A., Sinclair, L., Sternberg, T., Kailes, J.I.: Preparing for and responding to pandemic influenza: Implications for people with disabilities. Am. J. Public Health 99(2), 294–300 (2009). https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.162677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cameron, C. T.: Emergency planning for people with disabilities and other special needs. Washington, DC. Inclusion Incorporated, http://disabilitypreparedness.org/Planning%20for%20People%20With%20Disabilities%20article.doc, Accessed 27 Sept 2008

  6. White, G. W., Fox, M.H., Rooney, C., Cahill, A.: Assessing the impact of hurricane katrina on persons with disabilities. University of Kansas, Research and Training Center on Independent Living, Lawrence, KS (2007). http://www.rtcil.org/products/NIDRR_FinalKatrinaReport.pdf, Accessed 27 Sept 2008

  7. Ehrenkranz, M.: Vital coronavirus information is failing the blind and visually impaired. https://www.vice.com/en/article/4ag9wb/vital-coronavirus-information-is-failing-the-blind-and-visually-impaired, Accessed 23 June 2021

  8. Petrie, H., Savva, A., Power, C.: Towards a unified definition of web accessibility. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Web for All Conference (W4A ‘15), pp. 1–13. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2745555.2746653

  9. Oswal, S.K., Kairos, A.: Ableism - multimodality in motion: disability and Kairotic Spaces. J. Rhetoric Technol. Pedagogy 18(1) (2013). http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/18.1/coverweb/yergeau-et-al.

  10. Holloway, L., Butler, M., Reinders, S., Marriott, K.: Non-visual access to graphical information on COVID-19. In: The 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, pp. 1–3. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Siu, A.F.,et al.: COVID-19 highlights the issues facing blind and visually impaired people in accessing data on the web. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Web for All Conference, pp. 1–15. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Washington State Department of Health. https://www.doh.wa.gov/, Accessed 23 June 2021

  13. Aiyegbusi, O.L.: Key methodological considerations for usability testing of electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) systems. Qual. Life Res. 29(2), 325–333 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02329-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Brewer, R. N., Kameswaran, V.: Understanding trust, transportation, and accessibility through ridesharing. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–11. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tavassoli, F., et al.: Towards an effective web-based virtual health intervention: the impact of media platform, visual framing, and race on social presence and transportation ratings. In: Duffy, V.G. (ed.) HCII 2021. LNCS, vol. 12778, pp. 165–181. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77820-0_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Dobransky, K., Hargittai, E.: Unrealized potential: Exploring the digital disability divide. Poetics 58, 18–28 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Duplaga, M.: Digital divide among people with disabilities: analysis of data from a nationwide study for determinants of Internet use and activities performed online. PLoS ONE 12(6), e0179825 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Martins, J., Gonçalves, R., Branco, F.: A full scope web accessibility evaluation procedure proposal based on Iberian eHealth accessibility compliance. Comput. Hum. Behav. 73, 676–684 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jain, M., Diwakar, N., Swaminathan, M.: Smartphone usage by expert blind users. In: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–15. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Leporini, B., Buzzi, M., Hersh, M.: Distance meetings during the covid-19 pandemic: are video conferencing tools accessible for blind people?. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Web for All Conference, pp. 1–10. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0. https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/, Accessed 23 June 2021

  22. Baker, P., Hanson, J., Hunsinger, J.: Unconnected: Social Justice, Participation, and Engagement in the Information Society. Peter Lang Publishing, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Oswal, S. K.: Participatory design: barriers and possibilities. Commun. Des. Q. Rev 2(3), 14–19 (2014). https://doi-org.offcampus.lib.washington.edu/, https://doi.org/10.1145/2644448.2644452

  24. Morales Tirado, A.C., Daga, E., Motta, E.: Effective use of personal health records to support emergency services. In: Keet, C.M., Dumontier, M. (eds.) EKAW 2020. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 12387, pp. 54–70. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61244-3_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Giudice, N. A.: Covid-19 and blindness: why the new touchless, physically-distant world sucks for people with visual impairment. https://medium.com/@nicholas.giudice/covid-19-and-blindness-why-the-new-touchless-physically-distant-world-sucks-for-people-with-2c8dbd21de63, Accessed 21 June 2021

  26. Fogtmann, M.H., Fritsch, J., Kortbek, K.J.: Kinesthetic interaction: revealing the bodily potential in interaction design. In: Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Designing for Habitus and Habitat, pp. 89–96. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nabil, S., Girouard, A.: Creative interactions lab@Carleton University. In: Interactions. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3389153

  28. Oswal, S. K.: Breaking the exclusionary boundary between user experience and access: steps toward making UX inclusive of users with disabilities. In: Proceedings of the 37th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication (SIGDOC ‘19), pp. 1–8. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2019). https://doi-org.offcampus.lib.washington.edu/, https://doi.org/10.1145/3328020.3353957

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study has been approved by the Internal Review Board of the University of Washington.

We thank the program chairs for inviting us to present this poster paper in the Late Breaking session of the HCII 2021 Conference. Sushil Oswal thanks Hitender for his research assistance for this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA

    Sushil K. Oswal

  2. University of Puget Sound, Tacoma, WA, 98416, USA

    Lohitvenkatesh M. Oswal

Authors
  1. Sushil K. Oswal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lohitvenkatesh M. Oswal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sushil K. Oswal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Crete and Foundation for Research and Technology – Hellas (FORTH), Heraklion, Crete, Greece

    Constantine Stephanidis

  2. Foundation for Research and Technology – Hellas (FORTH), Heraklion, Crete, Greece

    Margherita Antona

  3. Foundation for Research and Technology – Hellas (FORTH), Heraklion, Crete, Greece

    Stavroula Ntoa

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Oswal, S.K., Oswal, L.M. (2021). Ideating for Co-designing with Blind and Visually Impaired Users:. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S. (eds) HCI International 2021 - Late Breaking Posters. HCII 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1499. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90179-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90179-0_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-90178-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-90179-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation