Skip to main content

Disruptive Technology in the Transportation Sector (Case in Indonesia)

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI International 2021 - Late Breaking Posters (HCII 2021)

Abstract

Online transport regulatory policies are critical to the success of this new type of transport. Tariff setting is a problem for online transportation users and drivers who are considered unfair. The zoning of operational areas that need to be underlined is the gap between conventional drivers and online drivers. This study looks at online transportation users’ responses and drivers to tariff and zoning policies for operational areas. The method used in this research is qualitative analysis. This research uses Nvivo 12 Plus software to analyze qualitative data, which presents cross tab analysis and visual analysis. The stages in using Nvivo have five stages including; data collection, data import, data coding, data classification, and data presentation. The data that Nvivo had processed was then continued for qualitative analysis. The data source was obtained from the Twitter data set. This study's findings indicate that the tariff setting has not provided a solution to the gap between users and drivers of online transportation. The zoning of online transportation operations does not yet have a solid legal umbrella to enforce so that it still causes polemics between conventional and online transportation. This research's limitation is that this research only discusses the tariff and red zone for online transportation. Recommendations for further research are grouping online transportation problems in all urban areas in Indonesia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Damayanti, S.A.S.: Transportasi Berbasis Aplikasi Online: Go-Jek Sebagai Sarana Transportasi Masyarakat Kota Surabaya. Universitas Airlangga (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Astutik, Y.: 21,7 Juta Masyarakat Indonesia Pakai Transportasi Online, CNBC Indonesia (2020). https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/tech/20200317150135-37-145529/217-juta-masyarakat-indonesia-pakai-transportasi-online. Accessed: 25 Jan 2021

  3. Anindhita, W., Arisanty, M., Rahmawati, D.: Analisis Penerapan Teknologi Komunikasi Tepat Guna Pada Bisnis Transportasi Ojek Online (Studi pada Bisnis Gojek dan Grab Bike dalam Penggunaan Teknologi Komuniasi Tepat Guna untuk Mengembangkan Bisnis Transportasi). In: Prosiding Seminar Nasional INDOCOMPAC (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rifaldi, R., Kadunci, K., Sulistyowati, S.: Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Transportasi Online Gojek Terhadap Kepuasan Pelanggan Pada Mahasiswa/i Administrasi Niaga Politeknik Negeri Jakarta. Epigram 13(2) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Avinda, S.P.: Analisis dampak ojek online terhadap pangkalan ojek konvensional Griya Pasteur (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Syahputra, H., Basyar, L.K., Tamba, A.A.S.: Setiment analysis of public opinion on the Go-Jek Indonesia through twitter using algorithm support vector machine. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1462(1), 12063 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ramdhani, A., Muzadid, B.K., Alamanda, D.T., Fahruroji, F.: Persepsi Netizen Terhadap Kebijakan Pemerintah Pada Ojek Online Menggunakan Twitter Analysis. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi 2, 82–91 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sari, D.F., Kurniawati, D., Prayitno, E., Irfangi, I.: Sentiment analysis of Twitter social media to online transportation in Indonesia using naĂŻve bayes classifier. J. Int. Conf. Proc. 2(1), 31 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Adhani, H.: Controversy, legality and constitutionality of online public transportation in Indonesia. In: ICIB 2019, pp. 431–437 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Oshima, R., Fukuda, A., Fukuda, T., Satiennam, T.: Study on regulation of motorcycle taxi service in Bangkok. J. East. Asia Soc. Transp. Stud. 7, 1828–1843 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hadi, H., Tejomurti, K., Imanullah, M.N., Nurhidayatuloh: Online Transportation: violation of privacy rights and vulnerability to sexual violence by drivers in digital platform-based work. vol. 358, November 2017, pp. 241–246 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Djuyandi, Y., Hidayat, A.: Political space competition between online and conventional transportation in Jakarta, Indonesia. J. Soc. Dev. Sci. 10(1)(S), 1–10 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sekar Bidari, A.: The political law of government in responding to the development of online transportation in Indonesia. In: SHS Web Conference, vol. 54, p. 06012 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ambarwati, O.C., Nugroho, R.A., Suharto, D.G., Setyowati, K.: Narration of stakeholder perspectives on online transportation policy. In: ICSTCSD 2019, vol. 389, pp. 80–84 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Arnold, V.: The changing technological environment and the future of behavioural research in accounting. Account. Financ. 58(2), 315–339 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Danneels, E.: Disruptive technology reconsidered: a critique and research agenda. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 21(4), 246–258 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Brennan, N.M., Subramaniam, N., van Staden, C.J.: Corporate governance implications of disruptive technology: an overview. Br. Account. Rev. 51(6), 100860 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Limba, T.: Industry 4.0 and national security: the phenomenon of disruptive technology. vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1528–1535 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kostoff, R.N., Boylan, R., Simons, G.R.: Disruptive technology roadmaps. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 71(1–2), 141–159 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cartwright, M.: Historical institutionalism and technological change: the case of Uber. Bus. Polit. 2017, 1–24 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ganguly, A., Das, N., Farr, J.V.: The role of marketing strategies in successful disruptive technologies. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Manag. 14(3), 1–20 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bick, G.: Uber SA: disruption of the local taxi industry? Emerald Emerg. Mark. Case Stud. 9(2), 1–9 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nazir, M.S., et al.: No Title . Spectrochim. Acta - Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. vol. 192, no. 4, pp. 121–130 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Geissinger, A., Laurell, C., Sandström, C.: Digital disruption beyond uber and Airbnb—tracking the long tail of the sharing economy. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 155, 1 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Laurell, C., Sandström, C.: Analysing Uber in social media—disruptive technology or institutional disruption? Int. J. Innov. Manag. 20(05), 1640013 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Schwalbe, U.: Schneider Henrique: Creative destruction and the sharing economy: Uber as disruptive innovation. J. Econ. 124(1), 93–96 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-017-0589-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Azizah, A., Adawia, P.R.: Analisis perkembangan industri transportasi online di era inovasi disruptif (Studi Kasus PT Gojek Indonesia). Cakrawala-Jurnal Hum. 18(2), 149–156 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Harahap, A.M.: DETERMINATION OF GO-FOOD WORKERS’WAGES IN THE VEW OF YUSUF QARDHAWI: CASE STUDY OF PT. GOJEK MEDAN. Int. J. Lang. Res. Educ. Stud. 4(1), 44–53 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Latifah, L.: Analisis hukum islam terhadap penerapan tarif layanan jasa PT. Ojek Syar’i Indonesia di Surabaya. EKNIS J. Ekon. Islam dan Ekon. Pondok Pesantren 7(1) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Atletiko, F.J., Rakhmawati, N.A., Ts, H.: Determination of freight rates based on package dimension and distance of delivery using fuzzy logic system in Angkotin application. Procedia Comput. Sci. 161, 527–534 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rozdianda, M.: PERSEBARAN ZONA MERAH OJEK ONLINE DI SURAKARTA. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rusyadi, M.K., Fajarwati, A.: Dampak Transportasi Online Terhadap Keberlanjutan Angkutan Kota (Angkot) Sebagai Transportasi Umum Perkotaan Di Kota Bandung. J. Bumi Indones. 9(3) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ristanti, N.S.: Smart Mobility dalam Pengembangan Transportasi Berbasis Aplikasi Online Di Indonesia. Ruang 4(3), 237–246 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Google.com: Trends in online transportation topic in online media from 2018–2019 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ministry of Transportation: Decree of the Minister of Transportation Number KP.348 of 2019 GUIDELINES FOR CALCULATION OF SERVICE COSTS FOR USE OF MOTORCYCLES USED FOR THE INTEREST OF THE COMMUNITY DONE WITH THE APPLICATION (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pahmi Amri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Amri, P., Nurmandi, A., Mutiarin, D. (2021). Disruptive Technology in the Transportation Sector (Case in Indonesia). In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S. (eds) HCI International 2021 - Late Breaking Posters. HCII 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1498. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90176-9_64

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90176-9_64

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-90175-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-90176-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics