Skip to main content

An Introduction to Qualitative Evaluation Approaches

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evaluation Methods in Biomedical and Health Informatics

Part of the book series: Health Informatics ((HI))

  • 1509 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter is the first of three devoted to describing qualitative methods for evaluating informatics interventions. Its major goals are to describe when qualitative methods are appropriate and to offer a general framework for understanding how studies using these methods are conducted. Chapters 15 and 16 provide much more detailed tours through the methods of qualitative evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Berg BL, Lune H. Qualitative research methods for social scientists. 8th ed. Pearson: Boston, MA; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crabtree BF, Miller WL. Doing qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell JW. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis WS. Business systems design and analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsythe DE. Using ethnography to build a working system: rethinking basic design assumptions. Symp Comput Applications Med Care. 1992;16:505–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsythe DE. New bottles, old wine: hidden cultural assumptions in a computerized explanation system for migraine sufferers. Med Anthropol Q. 1996;10:551–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Forsythe DE. Using ethnography to investigate life scientists’ information needs. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1998;86(3):402–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goedhart NS, Zuiderent-Jerak T, Woudstra J, Broerse JEW, Betten AW, Dedding C. Persistent inequitable design and implementation of patient portals for users at the margins. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021;28(2):276–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House ER. Evaluating with validity. Beverly Hills: Sage; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021;28(2):197–423. (special issue).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan B. Initial impact of a clinical laboratory computer system. J Med Syst. 1987;11:137–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan B, Duchon D. Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in information systems research: a case study. MIS Q. 1988;12:571–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keikhosrokiani P. Perspectives in the development of mobile medical information systems: life cycle, management, methodological approach and application. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman DA. The design of everyday things. New York: Basic Books; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sittig DF, Singh H. A new sociotechnical model for studying health information technology in complex adaptive healthcare systems. Qual Saf Heath Care. 2010;19(suppl 3):i68–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toye F. Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted. Br J Pain. 2015;9:7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • University of Technology Sydney. Adapting research methods in the COVID-19 pandemic: resources for researchers, 2nd ed. December, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd T, Flores F. Understanding computers and cognition: a new foundation for design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles P. Friedman .

Answers to Self-Tests

Answers to Self-Tests

Self-Test 14.1

  1. 1.

    Qualitative methods can be especially useful at the beginning of a project because they can yield information in the form of a needs assessment. Later, after implementation, they can be extremely valuable if used to provide feedback for improving the information resource.

  2. 2.

    Systems analysis processes attempt to be sensitive to the context into which the system will be placed and they are also iterative like qualitative processes.

  3. 3.

    These methods are inductive and interpretive because they require the study team to be open minded, to learn from participants, and to offer explanations and describe the meaning of cultural attributes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Friedman, C.P., Wyatt, J.C., Ash, J.S. (2022). An Introduction to Qualitative Evaluation Approaches. In: Evaluation Methods in Biomedical and Health Informatics. Health Informatics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86453-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86453-8_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86452-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86453-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics