Abstract
The New Ecological Paradigm scale (NEPS) is a worldwide survey-based metric, designed to measure the environmental concern of groups of people through a single instrument including fifteen statements. As far as it is known, the NEPS has never been previously applied to Urban Green Spaces’ Users (UGSU). The assessment and analysis of this group’s perception of the environmental concern could be a core element in promoting environmental sustainability. This research aims to measure and analyse UGSU (n = 132) NEPS score in a southern European city. The factor structure and psychometric properties of the NEPS revealed good internal consistency and the explained variance is higher than the original study. Thus, its application is considered reliable when applied to UGSU. UGSU presented higher ecocentric values when compared to the general population, university teachers and agricultural farmers. Concerning UGSU sociodemographic characteristics, the youngers adults are those that mostly share an ecological worldview. Also, those that more often visit Urban Green Spaces (UGS), recognized that plants and animals have the same right to exist as humans. It is expected that this work may contribute to explore the usefulness of the NEPS application in different contexts and to underline values that will have a significant effect on debates involving environmental sustainability as a cross-cutting issue.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abegão JLR (2019) Where the wild things were is where humans are now: an overview. Hum Ecol 47:669–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-019-00099-3
Battistella LF, Velter AN, Grohmann MZ, Casasola FP (2012) Aplicação da Escala-NEP para a Mensuração da Consciência Ecológica de Professores Universitários: Perfil e Implicações para Estudos Futuros [Application of the NEP Scale for the Measurement of Ecological Awareness of University Teachers: Profile and Implications for Future Studies]. Desenvolv em Questão 10:207. https://doi.org/10.21527/2237-6453.2012.19.207-238
Braubach M, Egorov A, Mudu P et al (2017) Effects of urban green space on environmental health, equity and resilience. In: Kabisch N, Korn H, Stadler J, Bonn A (eds) Nature-based solutions to climate change adaptation in urban areas. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 187–205
Carson R (2000) Silent spring. Penguin Books LTD, Londres
Castro P, Lima ML (2001) Old and new ideas about the environment and science: an exploratory study. Environ Behav 33:400–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121973052
Catton WR, Dunlap RE (1978) Environmental sociology: a new paradigm. Am Sociol 13:41–49
Catton WR, Dunlap RE (1980) A new ecological paradigm for post-exuberant sociology. Am Behav Sci 24:45–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276428002400103
Crutzen P, Stoermer E (2000) The ‘Anthropocene.’ Glob Chang Newsl 41:17–18
Daniel J (2012) Choosing the size of the sample. In: Daniel J (ed) Sampling essentials: practical guidelines for making sampling choices. SAGE Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks, California, pp 236–253
de Vries S (2010) Nearby nature and human health: looking at mechanisms and their implications. In: Ward Thompson C, Bell S, Aspinall P (eds) Innovative approaches to researching landscape and health. Oxon, Routledge, pp 77–96
Denis HD, Pereira LN (2014) Measuring the level of endorsement of the new environmental paradigm: a transnational study. Dos Algarves A Multidiscip e-J 23:4–26
Dunlap RE, Van Liere KD, Mertig AG, Jones RE (2000) Measuring environmental attitudes: measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale. J Soc Issues 56:425–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00176
Emilsson T, Ode Sang Å (2017) Impacts of climate change on urban areas and nature-based solutions for adaptation. In: Kabisch N, Korn H, Stadler J, Bonn A (eds) Nature-based solutions to climate change adaptation in urban areas. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 15–27
Erdoǧan N (2009) Testing the new ecological paradigm scale: Turkish case. Afr J Agric Res 4:1023–1031
European Commission (2021) The EU and nature-based solutions. In: Nature-based Solut. https://ec.europa.eu/info/research-and-innovation/research-area/environment/nature-based-solutions_en. Accessed 7 Jan 2021
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2019) Ecosystem services and biodiversity (ESB). http://www.fao.org/ecosystem-services-biodiversity/background/regulating-services/en/. Accessed 6 Jun 2019
Fransson N, Garling T (1999) Environmental concern: conceptual definitions, measurement methods, and research findings. J Environ Psychol 19:369–382. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1999.0141
Freitas A (2007) Desenvolvimento e mudança paradigmática na Madeira: Atitudes sociais sobre ambiente [Development and paradigmatic change in Madeira: Social attitudes about the environment]. Sociol Probl e Práticas 54:101–125
Hartig T, Mitchell R, de Vries S, Frumkin H (2014) Nature and health. Annu Rev Public Heal 35:207–208. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182443
Home R, Hunziker M, Bauer N (2012) Psychosocial outcomes as motivations for visiting nearby urban green spaces. Leis Sci 34:350–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2012.687644
IPCC (2018) The intergovernmental panel on climate change. In: Glob Warm 1.5 °C. https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/. Accessed 21 Sep 2020
Jennings V, Bamkole O (2019) The relationship between social cohesion and urban green space: an avenue for health promotion. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16:452. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030452
Jones RE, Dunlap RE (1992) The social bases of environmental concern: have they changed over time? Rural Sociol 57:28–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.1992.tb00455.x
Khan A, Khan MN, Adil M (2012) Exploring the new ecological paradigm (NEP) scale in India: item analysis, factor structure and refinement. Asia-Pacific J Manag Res Innov 8:389–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/2319510X13477966
MacKinnon K, van Ham C, Reilly K, Hopkins J (2019) Nature-based solutions and protected areas to improve urban biodiversity and health. In: Marselle MR, Stadler J, Korn H et al (eds) Biodiversity and health in the face of climate change. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 363–380
Madureira H, Nunes F, Oliveira J, Madureira T (2018) Preferences for urban green space characteristics: a comparative study in three portuguese cities. Environments 5:23. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments5020023
Ntanos S, Kyriakopoulos G, Skordoulis M et al (2019) An application of the new environmental paradigm (NEP) scale in a Greek context. Energies 12:1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12020239
Ogunbode CA (2013) The NEP scale: measuring ecological attitudes/worldviews in an African context. Environ Dev Sustain 15:1477–1494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-013-9446-0
Pauleit S, Zölch T, Hansen R et al (2017) Nature-based solutions and climate change—four shades of green. Cham, Springer
Pordata (2018) População Residente [Resident Population]. In: Pordata—Base dados Port. Contemp. https://www.pordata.pt/Municipios/População+residente-359. Accessed 13 May 2019
Reyna C, Bressán E, Mola D et al (2018) Validating the structure of the New Ecological Paradigm scale among Argentine citizens through different approaches. Pensam Psicológico 16:107–118. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeria
Schinaider AD, Talamini E (2019) Consciência Ambiental Versus Atitudes Pró-Ambientais: uma avaliação dos proprietários das agroindústrias familiares [Environmental Awareness Versus Pro-Environmental Attitudes: An Appraisal by Family Agribusiness Owners]. Rev Bras Gestão e Desenvolv Reg 15:33–47
Schmidt L, Truninger M, Guerra J et al (2016) Primeiro Grande Inquérito sobre Sustentabilidade—Relatório Final [First Grand Sustainability Survey—Final Report]. ICS: Lisboa
Seixas PC, Dias RC, Vidal DG (2020) Escala de Identidade Ambientalista: uma ferramenta para descobrirmos que ambientalistas somos [Environmentalist Identity Scale: a tool for discovering who environmentalists are]. Sociol Rev da Fac Let da Univ do Porto 39:56–83. https://doi.org/10.21747/08723419/soc39a4
Steffen W, Persson A, Deutsch L et al (2011) The anthropocene: from global change to planetary stewardship. Ambio 40:739–761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-011-0185-x
Talamini E, Schinaider AD, Shinaider AD, Liberalesso AM (2017) Tendências e perspectivas do Novo Paradigma Ecológico: uma revisão sistemática da produção científica [Trends and perspectives of the New Ecological Paradigm: a systematic review of scientific production]. Sustentabilidade em Debate 8:84–99. https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v8n3.2017.24656
Tendais I, Ribeiro AI (2020) Espaços verdes urbanos e saúde mental durante o confinamento causado pela COVID-19 [Urban green spaces and mental health during confinement caused by COVID-19]. Finisterra - Rev Port Geogr 55:183–188. https://doi.org/10.18055/Finis20184
Ulrich RS (1983) Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. Hum Behav Environ Adv Theory Res 6:85–125
Environment UN (2019) Global environment outlook—GEO-6: healthy planet, healthy people. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs PD (2019) World urbanization prospects: the 2018 revision (ST/ESA/SER.A/420). United Nations, New York
Ursachi G, Horodnic IA, Zait A (2015) How reliable are measurement scales? External factors with indirect influence on reliability estimators. Procedia Econ Financ 20:679–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(15)00123-9
Vargas-Hernández JG, Pallagst K, Zdunek-Wielgołaska J (2018) Urban green spaces as a component of an ecosystem. In: Marques J (ed) Handbook of engaged sustainability. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 1–32
Vidal DG, Barros N, Maia RL (2020) Public and green spaces in the context of sustainable development. In: Leal Filho W, Azul AM, Brandli L, et al. (eds) Sustainable cities and communities, encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable development goals. Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Cham, pp 1–9
Wolsink M (2016) Environmental education excursions and proximity to urban green space—densification in a ‘compact city.’ Environ Educ Res 22:1049–1071. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1077504
Wolsink M (2016b) ‘Sustainable City’ requires ‘recognition’—The example of environmental education under pressure from the compact city. Land Use Policy 52:174–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.018
Zhushi-Etemi F, Ceka R, Çadraku H et al (2020) The use of NEP scale to evaluate the environmental worldview of the employees in the city of Kacanik in Republic of Kosovo. Environ Dev Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00958-w
Zwierzchowska I, Hof A, Iojă IC et al (2018) Multi-scale assessment of cultural ecosystem services of parks in Central European cities. Urban Urban Green 30:84–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.12.017
Acknowledgements
Ricardo Cunha Dias would like to thank to Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT, I.P.) through the Doctoral Grant SFRH/BD/143238/2019. Diogo Guedes Vidal, Maria Alzira Pimenta Dinis, Nelson Barros and Rui Leandro Maia would like to thank to UFP Energy, Environment and Health Research Unit (FP-ENAS), funded by FCT, I.P, in the scope of FCT Project UID/Multi/04546/2019.
Funding
Diogo Guedes Vidal was funded by the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT, I.P.) through the Doctoral Grant SFRH/BD/143238/2019.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vidal, D.G. et al. (2022). Measuring Environmental Concern of Urban Green Spaces’ Users (UGSU) Through the Application of the New Ecological Paradigm Scale (NEPS): Evidence from a Southern European City. In: Leal Filho, W., Vidal, D.G., Dinis, M.A.P., Dias, R.C. (eds) Sustainable Policies and Practices in Energy, Environment and Health Research. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86304-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86304-3_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86303-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86304-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)