Skip to main content

Exploring User Requirements for an Exoskeleton Arm Insights from a User-Centered Study with People Living with Severe Paralysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2021 (INTERACT 2021)

Abstract

It is recognised that assistive technology plays an active role in empowering individuals who live with severe paralysis. Exoskeleton (exo) technology is a promising emerging assistive technology—a wearable robot designed to support the functions of the human body. However, an exoskeleton is a complex technology, and the successful design of exoskeletons depends heavily on the ability to integrate this type of robot in the environments of future users. In this paper, we present insights into user requirements produced through a qualitative study involving adults living with one of the most severe forms of paralysis: tetraplegia, or paralysis from the neck down. The study is based on two iterations of interviews conducted in the homes of future users. The study identifies key user requirements and contextual factors that are important for user acceptance of future exo design. We discuss how to integrate these findings in the design of an exo prototype of an exoskeleton arm targeted at people living with tetraplegia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Armour, B., Courtney-Long, E., Fox, M., Fredine, H., Cahill, A.: Prevalence and causes of paralysis—United States, 2013. Am. J. Public Health 106(10), 1855–1857 (2016). https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beckerle, P.: Human-Machine-Centered Design and Actuation of Lower Limb Prosthetic Systems (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Christ, O., Beckerle, P.: Towards active lower limb prosthetic systems: design issues and solutions. Biomed. Eng. Online 15(S3), 139 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-016-0283-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Christ, O., et al.: User-centered prosthetic development: comprehension of Amputees’ needs. Biomed. Eng./Biomed. Tech. 57(SI-1 Track-R), 1098–1101 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2012-4306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ding, D., Cooper, R.A., Pearlman, J.: In: International Conference on Engineering Education – ICEE 2007 Incorporating Participatory Action Design into Research and Education (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hill, D., Holloway, C., Ramirez, D., Smitham, P., Pappas, Y.: What are user perspectives of exoskeleton technology? A literature review. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 33(2), 160–167 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462317000460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kobbelgaard, F.V., Kanstrup, A.M., Bødker, S.: Designing a game to explore human artefact ecologies for assistive robotics – basing design games on an activity theoretical framework. In: Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction—Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society, Tallinn, Estonia (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Krishnaswamy, K.: Participatory design: repositioning, transferring, and personal care robots. In: HRI 2017: Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction, pp. 351–352 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Krishnaswamy, K., Moorthy, S., Oates, T.: Preliminary survey analysis in participatory design: repositioning, transferring, and personal care robots. In: HRI 2017: Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction, pp. 171–172 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lynn, J.D., Armstrong, E., Martin, S.: User Requirements in Multimodal System Design and Robotics. In: Ibáñez, J., González-Vargas, J., Azorín, J.M., Akay, M., Pons, J.L. (eds.) Converging Clinical and Engineering Research on Neurorehabilitation II. BB, vol. 15, pp. 1193–1197. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46669-9_194

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Maheu, V., Frappier, J., Archambault, P.S., Routhier, F.: Evaluation of the JACO robotic arm: clinico-economic study for powered wheelchair users with upper-extremity disabilities. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Zurich, June 2011, pp. 1–5 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pedrocchi, A.: MUNDUS project: multimodal neuroprosthesis for daily upper limb support. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 10(1), 66 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-10-66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pons, J.L. (ed.): Wearable Robots: Biomechatronic Exoskeletons. Wiley (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Power, V., et al.: Exploring User Requirements for a Lower Body Soft Exoskeleton to Assist Mobility (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Prior, S.D.: An electric wheelchair mounted robotic arm—a survey of potential users. J. Med. Eng. Technol. 14(4), 143–154 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Andreasen, L., Struijk, L., Egsgaard, R., Gaihede, M., Bentsen, B.: Wireless intraoral tongue control of an assistive robotic arm for individuals with tetraplegia. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 14, 110 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-017-0330-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Thøgersen, M., Gull, M.A., Kobbelgaard, F.V., Mohammadi, M., Bengtson, S.H., Struijk, L.N.S.A.: EXOTIC—a discreet user-based 5 DoF upper-limb exoskeleton for individuals with tetraplegia. In: 2020 3rd International Conference on Mechatronics, Robotics and Automation (ICMRA), pp. 79–83. (2020)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is part of the EXOTIC project at Aalborg. We would like to thank our collaborators on the project: Mikkel Thøgersen, Stefan Bengtson, Mostafa Mohammadi and Muhammad Ahsan Gull. Further, we would like to thank the participants who contributed and collaborated with us in order to create the insights reflected in the article. Finally, we thank the Spinal Cord Injury Centre of Western Denmark for assistance with recruitment and their expertise.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frederik Victor Kobbelgaard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kobbelgaard, F.V., Kanstrup, A.M., Struijk, L.N.S.A. (2021). Exploring User Requirements for an Exoskeleton Arm Insights from a User-Centered Study with People Living with Severe Paralysis. In: Ardito, C., et al. Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2021. INTERACT 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12932. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85623-6_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85623-6_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85622-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85623-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics