Abstract
In most computer supported collaborative learning activities, the teacher monitors and/or reviews data generated by students and groups as they complete the learning tasks, in order to provide guidance and feedback. Without appropriate technological means that support the processes of collection and selection of students’ generated responses, these duties can result in a high cognitive load for teachers, especially if students generate textual, qualitative content that requires real-time reviewing. In this research we deal with EthicApp, a collaborative application in which this problem is apparent, as students analyze a given ethics case individually and in small groups and deliver written judgements in each phase of the activity. We present a solution to the problem, based on enhancing EthicApp’s teacher’s interface with automated content analysis capabilities. This includes a dashboard that automatically displays students’ most relevant contributions, and cluster visualizations that permit identifying groups of students with similar responses to activity tasks. Validation of the approach was based on a dataset comprising 4,366 comments about an academic ethics case, which were written by 520 students divided into 19 class groups. Expert judgement was applied to evaluate content analysis effectiveness at selecting comments that are both meaningful and representative of students’ different views. More than 80% of comment selections were found valuable, according to experts’ analysis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Uribe, P., Jiménez, A., Araya, R., Lämsä, J., Hämäläinen, R., Viiri, J.: Automatic content analysis of computer-supported collaborative inquiry-based learning using deep networks and attention mechanisms. In: Vittorini, P., Di Mascio, T., Tarantino, L., Temperini, M., Gennari, R., De la Prieta, F. (eds.) MIS4TEL 2020. AISC, vol. 1241, pp. 95–105. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52538-5_11
Chang, Y.-H., Chang, C.-Y., Tseng, Y.-H.: Trends of science education research: an automatic content analysis. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 19(4), 315–331 (2010)
Alvarez, C., Zurita, G., Baloian, N., Jerez, O., Peñafiel, S.: A CSCL script for supporting moral reasoning in the ethics classroom. In: Nakanishi, H., Egi, H., Chounta, I.-A., Takada, H., Ichimura, S., Hoppe, U. (eds.) CRIWG+CollabTech 2019. LNCS, vol. 11677, pp. 62–79. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28011-6_5
Daems, O., et al.: Using content analysis and domain ontologies to check learners’ understanding of science concepts. J. Comput. Educ. 1(2), 113–131 (2014)
Lui, A.K.-F., Li, S.C., Choy, S.O.: An evaluation of automatic text categorization in online discussion analysis. In: Seventh IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2007). IEEE (2007)
Gandz, J., Hayes, N.: Teaching business ethics. J. Bus. Ethics 7(9), 657–669 (1988)
McCoy, C.S.: Management of values: the ethical difference in corporate policy and performance (1985)
Butts, D., Janie, B.: Nursing ethics: across the curriculum and into practice book review. Online J. Health Ethics 2(2), 2 (2005)
Patel, P.: Engineers, ethics, and the VW scandal. IEEE Spectr. 25 (2015)
Zunger, J.: Computer science faces an ethics crisis. The Cambridge Analytica scandal proves it. Boston Globe 22 (2018)
EMOL. UC suspende hasta por un año a alumnos que participaron en copia masiva por WhatsApp (2016). https://www.emol.com/noticias/Nacional/2016/06/23/809292/UC-suspende-hasta-por-un-ano-a-alumnos-que-participaron-en-copia-masiva-por-WhatsApp.html. Accessed 1 Jan 2020
Leighton, P.: El alto costo de las conductas académicas deshonestas. El Mercurio (2018). http://www.economiaynegocios.cl/noticias/noticias.asp?id=452080. Accessed 1 Jan 2020
AACSB. Ethics Education in Business Schools (2004). https://www.aacsb.edu/~/media/AACSB/Publications/research-reports/ethics-education.ashx. Accessed 1 Jan 2020
ABET. Rationale for revising criteria 3 (2016). http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/accreditation-alerts/rationale-for-revising-criteria-3/. Accessed 1 Jan 2020
AAA, American Accounting Association. Committee on the Future Structure, Content, and Scope of Accounting Education (The Bedford Committee): Future accounting education: preparing for the expanding profession. Issues Account. Educ. 1(1), 168–195 (1986)
Apostolou, B., Dull, R.B., Schleifer, L.L.: A framework for the pedagogy of accounting ethics. Account. Educ. 22(1), 1–17 (2013)
Holsapple, M.A., et al.: Framing faculty and student discrepancies in engineering ethics education delivery. J. Eng. Educ. 101(2), 169–186 (2012)
Felton, E.L., Sims, R.R.: Teaching business ethics: targeted outputs. J. Bus. Ethics 60(4), 377–391 (2005)
Johnson, J.F., et al.: Case-based ethics education: the impact of cause complexity and outcome favorability on ethicality. J. Empirical Res. Hum. Res. Ethics 7(3), 63–77 (2012)
Hunt, S.D., Vitell, S.J.: The general theory of marketing ethics: a revision and three questions. J. Macromark. 26(2), 143–153 (2006)
Illingworth, S.: Approaches to Ethics in Higher Education: Teaching Ethics Across the Curriculum (2004)
Rafinda, A., Gál, T., Purwaningtyas, P.: Business ethics course on student moral reasoning. Oradea J. Bus. Econ. 4(Special), 60–68 (2019)
Carvallo, A., et al.: Automatic document screening of medical literature using word and text embeddings in an active learning setting. Scientometrics 125(3), 3047–3084 (2020)
Lai, L.S., To, W.M.: Content analysis of social media: a grounded theory approach. J. Electron. Commer. Res. 16(2), 138 (2015)
Günther, E., Quandt, T.: Word counts and topic models: automated text analysis methods for digital journalism research. Digit. J. 4(1), 75–88 (2016)
Chau, H., et al.: Automatic concept extraction for domain and student modeling in adaptive textbooks. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 1–27 (2020)
Ferreira, M., et al.: Towards automatic content analysis of social presence in transcripts of online discussions. In: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (2020)
Mirzaei, M., Sahebi, S., Brusilovsky, P.: Annotated examples and parameterized exercises: analyzing students’ behavior patterns. In: Isotani, S., Millán, E., Ogan, A., Hastings, P., McLaren, B., Luckin, R. (eds.) AIED 2019. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11625, pp. 308–319. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23204-7_26
Luo, W., et al.: Automatic summarization of student course feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.10395 (2018)
Zou, W., et al.: Exploring the relationship between social presence and learners’ prestige in MOOC discussion forums using automated content analysis and social network analysis. Comput. Hum. Behav. 115, 106582 (2021)
Moore, R.L., Oliver, K.M., Wang, C.: Setting the pace: examining cognitive processing in MOOC discussion forums with automatic text analysis. Interact. Learn. Environ. 27(5–6), 655–669 (2019)
Crossley, S.A., et al.: Incorporating learning characteristics into automatic essay scoring models: what individual differences and linguistic features tell us about writing quality. J. Educ. Data Min. 8(2), 1–19 (2016)
Khan, W., et al.: A survey on the state-of-the-art machine learning models in the context of NLP. Kuwait J. Sci. 43(4) (2016)
Canete, J., et al.: Spanish pre-trained BERT model and evaluation data. In: PML4DC at ICLR, vol. 2020 (2020)
Alvarez, C., Zurita, G., Baloian, N.: Applying the concept of implicit HCI to a groupware environment for teaching ethics. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 1–19 (2021)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Alvarez, C., Zurita, G., Carvallo, A., Ramírez, P., Bravo, E., Baloian, N. (2021). Automatic Content Analysis of Student Moral Discourse in a Collaborative Learning Activity. In: Hernández-Leo, D., Hishiyama, R., Zurita, G., Weyers, B., Nolte, A., Ogata, H. (eds) Collaboration Technologies and Social Computing. CollabTech 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12856. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85071-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85071-5_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85070-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85071-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)