Abstract
Influenced by many cultural, economic and historic factors, the antiquities market of Andean archaeological artefacts is a complex issue. Authenticity is one of the most important aspects upon which the attribution of value within the antiquities trade depends. On the one hand, a theoretical discourse around the concept of ‘constructed authenticity’ inevitably derives from the contradiction generated between the almost total absence of data regarding archaeological provenience and the value assigned to these commodified antiquities. On the other, like beauty and culture, the opposition between true and false is also culturally constructed and changes throughout an object’s biography. I argue that authenticity can be polysemic and Peruvian antiquities that cannot be authenticated archaeologically can be perceived as authentic differently: authentically exotic or authentically beautiful. Even though e-commerce and in-person auction houses have many divergences, a comparison allows for a focus on the cross issues connected to authenticity. Indeed, a juxtaposition of two listings offering similar items on sale in eBay and Sotheby’s allows a discussion on how those artefacts are perceived outside of the national borders where they were collected, and how this perception impacts on selling techniques and venues.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The expression ’grey market’ refers to the opacity of the market of antiquities, to the complexity of its legal and illegal, public and private dynamics, to the ”moral ambiguity” of taking part in it and to the impossibility to separate the legal and illegal markets (Mackenzie & Yates, 2017).
- 2.
Which existed since the Conquest and deeply damaged many archaeological sites in Peru (see Alva, 2001).
- 3.
See Jones (2010) for a comprehensive bibliography and a history of approaches to authenticity.
- 4.
- 5.
Moche, or Mochica, culture developed in the coast of northern Peru between the first and seventh century A.D.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
I am talking here about additional guarantees other than the “Money Back Guaranty” (eBay, 2020b)
References
Alva, W. (2001). The destruction, looting and traffic of the archaeological heritage of Peru. In N. Brodie, J. Doole, & C. Renfrew (Eds.), Trade in illicit antiquities: The destruction of the World’s Archaeological Heritage (pp. 89–96). McDonald Institute Monographs.
Appadurai, A. (1986). Introduction: Commodities and the politics of value. In A. Appadurai (Ed.), The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspectives (pp. 3–63). Cambridge University Press.
Bohem, M. (2009, May 29). Relic sellers are faking it on EBay. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved December 23, 2020, from http://articles.latimes.com/2009/may/29/entertainment/et-ebayfakes29
Boone, E. H. (Ed.). (1982). Falsifications and Misreconstructions of Pre-Columbian Art: A Conference at Dumbarton Oaks, October 14th and 16th, 1978. Dumbarton Oaks, Trustees for Harvard University.
Brodie, N. (2014a). The internet market of pre-columbian antiquities. In J. D. Kila & M. Balcells (Eds.), Cultural property crime: An overview and analysis of contemporary perspectives and trends (pp. 237–262). Brill.
Brodie, N. (2014b). The antiquities market: It’s all in a price. Heritage and Society, 7(1), 32–46.
Brodie, N. (2014c). Auction houses and the antiquities trade. In S. Choulia-Kapeloni (Ed.), 3rd international conference of experts on the return of cultural property (pp. 71–82). Archaeological Receipts Fund.
Brodie, N. (2015). The internet market in antiquities. In F. Desmarais (Ed.), Countering illicit traffic in cultural goods: The global challenge of protecting the world’s heritage (pp. 11–20). ICOM.
Bruhns, K. O., & Kelker, N. L. (2010). Faking the ancient Andes. Left Coast Press.
Chippindale, C., & Gill, D. W. J. (2000). Material consequences of contemporary classical collecting. American Journal of Archaeology, 104(3), 463–511.
Chippindale, C., & Gill, D. W. J. (2001). On-line auctions: A new venue for the antiquities market. Culture Without Context, 9, 4–12.
Clifford, J. (1988). The predicament of culture: Twentieth-century ethnography, literature and art. Harvard University Press.
Coggins, C. (1998). United States cultural property legislation: Observation of a combatant. International Journal of Cultural Property, 7(1), 52–68.
Donnan, B. C. (1982). The identification of a Moche Fake through iconographic analysis. In E. H. Boone (Ed.), Falsification and misreconstructions of pre-columbian art: A conference at Dumbarton Oaks, October 14th and 16th, 1978 (pp. 37–50). Dumbarton Oaks, Trustees for Harvard University.
Donnan, B. C., & McClelland, D. (1999). Moche fineline painting: Its evolution and its artists. UCLA Fowler Museum of Cultural History.
eBay (2020a). Artifatcs and cave formations policy. Retrieved December 20, 2020, from https://www.ebay.com/help/policies/prohibited-restricted-items/artifacts-cultural-heritage-graverelated-items-policy?id=4282#section1
eBay (2020b). Money Back Guarantee Policy. Retrieved January 27, 2021, from https://www.ebay.com/help/policies/ebay-money-back-guarantee-policy/ebay-money-back-guarantee-policy?id=4210
eBay (2021). Photo Tips. Retrieved January 27, 2021, from https://pages.ebay.com/seller-center/listing-and-marketing/photo-tips.html
Fay, E. V. (2011). Virtual artifacts: eBay, antiquities and authenticity. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 27(4), 449–464.
Fay, E. V. (2013). Trading in antiquities on eBay: The changing face of the illicit trade in antiquities (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Newcastle: Keele University.
Gänger, S. (2014). Relics of the past: Collecting and study of Pre-Columbian antiquities in Peru and Chile, 1837–1911. Oxford University Press.
Geismar, H. (2001). What’s in a price? An ethnography of tribal art at auction. Journal of Material Culture, 6(1), 25–47.
Holtorf, C. (2013). On pastness: A reconsideration of materiality in archaeological object authenticity. Anthropological Quarterly, 86(2), 427–443.
ICE (2012). ICE returns stolen and looted art and antiquities to Peru. Retrieved February 19, 2021, from https://www.ice.gov/news/releases/ice-returns-stolen-and-looted-art-and-antiquities-peru
ICE (2014). 25 Peruvian cultural treasures returned to the government of Peru. Retrieved February 19, 2021, from https://www.ice.gov/news/releases/25-peruvian-cultural-treasures-returned-government-peru
ICOM. (2013[2004]). Code of Ethics for Museums. Resource document. Retrieved January 25, 2021, from http://musei.beniculturali.it/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/ICOM-Code-of-Ethics-for-Museums.pdf
Jarret, K. (2006). The perfect community: Disciplining the eBay used. In K. Hillis, M. Petit, & N. S. Epley (Eds.), Everyday eBay. Culture, collecting, and desire (pp. 107–122). Routledge.
Jones, S. (2010). Negotiating authentic objects and authentic selves: Beyond the deconstruction of authenticity. Journal of Material Culture, 15(2), 181–203.
Kopitoff, I. (1986). The cultural biography of things: Commoditization as process. In A. Appadurai (Ed.), The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective (pp. 64–94). Cambridge University Press.
Lowenthal, D. (1985). The past is a foreign country. Cambridge University Press.
Mackenzie, S., & Yates, D. (2017). What is grey about the “Grey Market” in antiquities? In J. Beckert & M. Dewey (Eds.), The architecture of illegal markets: Toward an economic sociology of illegality in the economy (pp. 70–86). Oxford University Press.
Ortiz, G. (2006). Overview and assessment after fifty years of collecting in a changing world. In E. Robson, L. Treadwell, & C. Gosden (Eds.), Who owns objects? The ethics and politics of collecting cultural artefacts (pp. 15–32). Oxbow book.
Pasztory, E. (2002). Truth in forgery. Anthropology and Aesthetics, 42, 159–165.
Reisinger, Y., & Steiner, C. (2006). Reconceptualizing object authenticity. Annals of Tourism Research, 33(1), 65–86.
SAA (1996). Principle for Archaeological Ethics. Resource document. Retrieved January 30, 2021, from https://documents.saa.org/container/docs/default-source/doc-careerpractice/saa_ethics.pdf?sfvrsn=75f1b83b_4
Sawyer, A. R. (1982). The falsification of ancient Peruvian slip-decorated ceramics. In E. H. Boone (Ed.), Falsifications and misreconstructions of Pre-Columbian Art: A Conference at Dumbarton Oaks, October 14th and 16th, 1978 (pp. 19–36). Dumbarton Oaks, Trustees for Harvard University.
Sease, C. (2007). Faking pre-Columbian artefacts. Objects Speciality Group Postprints, 14, 146–160.
Sonin, R. (1982). The art historian’s Dilemma: With remarks upon the state of art falsification in the Central and North Andean Region. In E. H. Boone (Ed.), Falsifications and Misreconstructions of Pre-Columbian Art: A Conference at Dumbarton Oaks, October 14th and 16th, 1978 (pp. 1–18). Dumbarton Oaks, Trustees for Harvard University.
Sotheby’s. (2014). African, Oceanic and Pre-Columbian Art. 16th May. Auction catalog. Sotheby’s.
Sotheby’s. (2020). Sell with Sotheby’s. . Retrieved December 20, 2020, from https://www.sothebys.com/en/sell
Sotheby’s. (2020b). Condition of sale. Retrieved December 22, 2020, from https://www.sothebys.com/content/dam/sothebys/PDFs/cob/N09502-COS.pdf
Stanish, C. (2009). Forging ahead: Or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love eBay. Archaeology, 62(3). Retrieved March 5, 2021, from https://archive.archaeology.org/0905/etc/insider.html
Trodd, Z. (2006). Reading eBay: Hidden Stores, Subjective Stories, and a People’s History of the Archive. In K. Hillis, M. Petit, & N. Scott Epley (Eds.), Everyday eBay. Culture, collecting, and desire (pp. 77–90). Routledge.
Watson, P. (1997). Sotheby’s: The inside story. Random House.
Yates, D. (2006). South America on the Block: The Changing Face of Pre-Columbian Antiquities Auctions in Response to International Law (Unpublished MPhil Dissertation). Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
Yates, D. (2015). Value and doubt: The persuasive power of “authenticity” in the antiquities market. PARSE, 2, 71–84.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Dr. Lau and Professor Hooper for supporting me with the research for my MA dissertation at the SRU–University of East Anglia, UK as the present contribution is based on those investigations.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Villa, F. (2021). Authentically Exotic and Authentically Beautiful. In: Oosterman, N., Yates, D. (eds) Crime and Art. Studies in Art, Heritage, Law and the Market, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84856-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84856-9_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-84855-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-84856-9
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)