Skip to main content

A Conceptual Design for Digital Industrial Symbiosis Ecosystems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The Next Wave of Sociotechnical Design (DESRIST 2021)

Abstract

Conceptualizing, developing, and using digital platforms to support industrial symbiosis has gained momentum to facilitate sustainable industrial development. However, current research provides little insight and scarce guidance for the design of platform-supported industrial symbiosis. Furthermore, experiences and viewpoints of (potential) platform users and providers are hardly captured. Moreover, the actors’ roles and the suitability of platforms for different industrial symbiosis settings remain neglected. These aspects are relevant for providing, maintaining, continuously developing, accepting, and using the platforms themselves. Therefore, within a long-term research project, we developed the Digital Industrial Symbiosis Ecosystem (DISE) concept as an artifact to guide developing and disseminating industrial symbiosis platforms (ISP). This research is embedded in a design science research approach focusing on design criteria for ISPs. In this paper, we present how we developed and evaluated the DISE concept from the perspective of design science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carter, C.R., Liane Easton, P.: Sustainable supply chain management: evolution and future directions. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 41, 46–62 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1108/09600031111101420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kosmol, L.: Sharing is caring - information and knowledge in industrial symbiosis: a systematic review. In: Proceedings of 2019 IEEE 21st Conference on Business Informatics (CBI 2019), pp. 21–30 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/CBI.2019.00010

  3. European Union: Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lombardi, D.R., Laybourn, P.: Redefining industrial symbiosis: crossing academic-practitioner boundaries. J. Ind. Ecol. 16, 28–37 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00444.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Deutz, P.: Food for thought: seeking the essence of industrial symbiosis. In: Salomone, R., Saija, G. (eds.) Pathways to Environmental Sustainability, pp. 3–11. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03826-1_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Grant, G.B., Seager, T.P., Massard, G., Nies, L.: Information and communication technology for industrial symbiosis. J. Ind. Ecol. 14, 740–753 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2010.00273.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. van Capelleveen, G., Amrit, C., Yazan, D.M.: A literature survey of information systems facilitating the identification of industrial symbiosis. In: Otjacques, B., Hitzelberger, P., Naumann, S., Wohlgemuth, V. (eds.) From Science to Society, pp. 155–169. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65687-8_14

  8. Yeo, Z., Masi, D., Low, J.S.C., Ng, Y.T., Tan, P.S., Barnes, S.: Tools for promoting industrial symbiosis: a systematic review. J. Ind. Ecol. 23, 1087–1108 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fraccascia, L.: Quantifying the direct network effect for online platforms supporting industrial symbiosis: an agent-based simulation study. Ecol. Econ. 170, 106587 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Scafá, M., Marconi, M., Germani, M.: A critical review of industrial symbiosis models. In: Peruzzini, M., Pellicciari, M., Bil, C., Stjepandić, J., and Wognum, N. (eds.) Transdisciplinary Engineering Methods for Social Innovation of Industry 4.0, pp. 1184–1193. IOS Press (2018). https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-898-3-1184

  11. Benedict, M., Kosmol, L., Esswein, W.: Designing industrial symbiosis platforms - from platform ecosystems to industrial ecosystems. In: Proceedings of PACIS 2018 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chertow, M.R.: Uncovering industrial symbiosis. J. Ind. Ecol. 11, 11–30 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1162/jiec.2007.1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lowe, E.A., Evans, L.K.: Industrial ecology and industrial ecosystems. J. Clean. Prod. 3, 47–53 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-6526(95)00045-G

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jacobides, M.G., Cennamo, C., Gawer, A.: Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strateg. Manag. J. 39, 2255–2276 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gawer, A., Cusumano, M.A.: Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation: platforms and innovation. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 31, 417–433 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. de Reuver, M., Sørensen, C., Basole, R.C.: The digital platform: a research agenda. J. Inf. Technol. 33, 124–135 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41265-016-0033-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., Bush, A.A.: Research commentary - platform evolution: coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Inf. Syst. Res. 21, 675–687 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. David, R., Aubert, B.A., Bernard, J.-G., Luczak-Roesch, M.: Critical mass in inter-organizational platforms. In: Proceedings of AMCIS 2020 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tiwana, A.: Platform Ecosystems: Aligning Architecture, Governance, and Strategy. Morgan Kaufmann, Amsterdam, Waltham, MA (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24, 45–77 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Niehaves, B.: Design science research genres: introduction to the special issue on exemplars and criteria for applicable design science research. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 27, 129–139 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2018.1458066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science research in information systems. MIS Q. 28, 75–105 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hevner, A.R.: A three cycle view of design science research. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 19, 87–92 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  24. March, S.T., Storey, V.T.: Design science in the information systems discipline: an introduction to the special issue on design science research. MIS Q. 32(4), 725–730 (2008). https://doi.org/10.2307/25148869

  25. Sonnenberg, C., vom Brocke, J.: Evaluation patterns for design science research artefacts. In: Helfert, M., Donnellan, B. (eds.) Practical Aspects of Design Science. CCIS, vol. 286, pp. 71–83. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33681-2_7

  26. Kosmol, L., Otto, L.: Implementation barriers of industrial symbiosis: a systematic review. In: Proceedings of HICSS 2020 (2020). https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2020.741

  27. Kosmol, L., Leyh, C.: Perspectives on industrial symbiosis implementation: informational, managerial, and it aspects. In: Ziemba, E. (ed.) Information Technology for Management: Current Research and Future Directions. LNBIP, vol. 380, pp. 192–213. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43353-6_11

  28. Kosmol, L., Leyh, C.: A vision for industrial symbiosis: build your platform (Ecosystem). In: Proceedings of ECIS 2020 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Raabe, B., et al.: Collaboration platform for enabling industrial symbiosis: application of the by-product exchange network model. Procedia CIRP. 61, 263–268 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Fric, U., Rončević, B.: E-simbioza – leading the way to a circular economy through industrial symbiosis in Slovenia. Soc. Ekol. 27(2), 119–140 (2018). https://doi.org/10.17234/SocEkol.27.2.1

  31. Kosmol, L.: Platforms as Enablers for Industrial Symbiosis. Dissertation, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden. (will be published in Fall 2021)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Fric, U., Rončević, B., Uršič, E.D.: Role of computer software tools in industrial symbiotic networks and the examination of sociocultural factors. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 39(2), e13364 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.13364

  33. Rosemann, M., Vessey, I.: Toward improving the relevance of information systems research to practice: the role of applicability checks. MIS Q. 32, 1–22 (2008). https://doi.org/10.2307/25148826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nunamaker, J.F., Briggs, R.O., Derrick, D.C., Schwabe, G.: The last research mile: achieving both rigor and relevance in information systems research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 32, 10–47 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2015.1094961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Song, P., Xue, L., Rai, A., Zhang, C.: The ecosystem of software platform: a study of asymmetric cross-side network effects and platform governance. MIS Q. 42, 121–142 (2018). https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2018/13737

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Leyh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kosmol, L., Leyh, C. (2021). A Conceptual Design for Digital Industrial Symbiosis Ecosystems. In: Chandra Kruse, L., Seidel, S., Hausvik, G.I. (eds) The Next Wave of Sociotechnical Design. DESRIST 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12807. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82405-1_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82405-1_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-82404-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-82405-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics