Abstract
The Corona pandemic has accelerated the digitalization of Swedish society showing that most new Internet users turn out to be 76 years and older. At the same time, digitalization of elderly care is progressing more slowly than expected. Why is this? In this paper, robots and personal emergency response systems are examples of digitalization of elderly care, discussed using result from Swedish and European research on social uptake of new technology and work conditions in the care sector. The result points out the contradiction between the high expectations and the large investments made in digital cutting-edge technology for the care sector and the fact that this issue is under-theorized. Also, what works is what is well organized and well integrated in the work and in daily habits and routines. Robots and PERS represent two opposites where the alarms are well integrated but robots based on expectations only.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
The Swedish Internet Foundation the Swedes and the Internet (2020). www.svenskarnaochinternet.se
The Swedish Internet Foundation the Swedes and the Internet (2019). https://svenskarnaochinternet.se/rapporter/svenskarna-och-internet-2019/
European Commission 1994: Europe and the Global information Society (Bangemann report). http://www.epractice.eu/files/media/media_694.pdf. Accessed 24 July 2012
En Nationell Strategi för Life Science [The Strategy for Life Science and Health] Government Offices Sweden (2019)
Government Offices Sweden: a) SOU 1994, b) SOU 1995, c) SOU 2014:13. A digital agenda at the service of mankind – a brighter future can be ours. Interim report by the Digitalization Commission
European Commission: a) EC 2015 http://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/research-and-innovation-ageing-well-ict The three programs are: The 7th. framework program (FP7); Ambient Assisted Living Joint Programme; and Competitiveness and Innovation programme (CIP), b) European Commission. The 2015 Ageing Report. Economic and budgetary projections for the 28 EU member states. European Economy 3/2015, c) European Commission: Robotics for healthcare. Final report 2008. Retrieved 2016–06–30 at https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/roadmap-application-robotics-medicine-and-healthcare-0, d) European Year of Active Ageing and Solidarity between Generations 2012. http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?langId=en&catId=89&newsId=2129.
National Board of Health and Welfare. E-health and welfare technology. Follow-up of the development of welfare technology in the municipalities. Stockholm: National Board of Health and Welfare (2020)
The National Board of Health and Welfare E-health and welfare technology in the municipalities 2017 Report on a follow-up of the development in e-health and welfare technology in the municipalities. Stockholm: National Board of Health and Welfare (2017)
Iborra, Andres: Design of Service Robots. Experiences Using Software Engineering. IEEE Robotics Automation Magazine (2009)
Example of businesses: https://nectarinehealth.com/, https://trygghetslarm.nu/pages/nyadoerrkontrolloesningar_1060.html, https://9solutions.com/en/solutions/home-care-solution/
One example integrating smart phones, exit sensors or sensors to monitor behavior, video consultation, care work and safety alarms is 9solutions, see: https://9solutions.com/en/solutions/home-care-solution/
Coradeschi, S., et al.: GiraffPlus: a system for monitoring activities and physiological parameters and promoting social interaction for elderly. In: Hippe, Z.S., Kulikowski, J.L., Mroczek, T., Wtorek, J. (eds.) Human-Computer Systems Interaction: Backgrounds and Applications 3. AISC, vol. 300, pp. 261–271. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08491-6_22
Shibata, T.: Therapeutic seal robot as biofeedback medical device: qualitative and quantitative evaluations of robot therapy in dementia Care. In: Proceedings of IEEE, vol. 100, no. 8. (2012)
Robotics Care Inc. http://roboticscare.com/robotics-care-poseidon/
Frennert, S., Östlund, B.: The domestication of robotic vacuum cleaners among seniors. Gerontechnology 12(3), 159–168 (2014)
Rydenfält, C., Holgersson, C., Östlund, B., Arvidsson, I., Johansson, G., Persson, R.: Picking low hanging fruit – a scoping review of work environment related interventions in the home care sector. Home health services quarterly. Accepted for publication (2020)
Rydenfält, C., et al.: Exploring local initiatives to improve the work environment – a qualitative survey in Swedish home care practice. Home health care management and practice, Accepted for publication (2020)
Östlund, B., Holgersson, C.: Under the radar – digitizing home care in times of gender inequality. In: Keisu: Gendered norms at work: new perspectives on work environment and health. Springer (2021)
Eurostat 2016: Digital inclusion – individuals. http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction.do
Pons, J.L. (ed.): INBOTS 2018. BB, vol. 25. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24074-5
INBOTS White Paper on Interactive Robotics Strategies to Increase Public Awareness and Acceptance. European Union. Ref. Ares (2019). 4339302. Accessed 08 July 2019
Östlund et al.: Uptake of Interactive Robots to promote health in Europe. What is the adoption potential and innovative maturity? INBOTS paper submitted to JN Social Robotics (2020)
Van Aerschot, L., Parvaiainen, J.: Robots responding to care needs? A multitasking care robot pursued for 25 years, available products offer simple entertainment and instrumental assistance. Ethics and Information Technology (2020)
Oxford The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerization? Frey and Osborne, Oxford (2013)
OECD The Risk of Automation for jobs in OECD Countries, Arntz m.fl., OECD (2016)
McKinsey A future that works: Automation, Employment and productivity, McKinsey (2017)
Meagher, G., Szebehely, M., Mears, J.: How institutions matter for job characteristics, quality and experiences: a comparison of home care work for older people in Australia and Sweden. Work Employ Soc. 30(5), 731–749 (2016)
Dellve, L., Eriksson, A.: Health-promoting managerial work: a theoretical framework for a leadership program that supports knowledge and capability to craft sustainable work practices in daily practice and during organizational change. Societies 7, 12 (2017)
Karltun, A., Karltun, J., Berglund, M., Eklund, J.: HTO – a complementary ergonomics approach. Appl. Ergon. 59, 182–190 (2017)
Peine, A., Neven, L.: From intervention to co-constitution: new directions in theorizing about aging and technology. Gerontologist 00(00), 1–7 (2018)
Bijker, W.: How is technology made? – That is the question! Camb. J. Econ. 34, 63–76 (2010)
Fischer, B., Peine, A., Östlund, B.: The importance of user involvement: a systematic review of involving older users in technology design. The Gerontol. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnz16
Essén, A., Östlund, B.: Laggards as innovators? old users as designers of new services & service systems. Int. J. Des. 5(3), 89–98 (2011)
Östlund, B., Frennert, S.: How have user representations been sustained and recreated in the design of technologies between 1960 and 2018? In: Peine, A., Marshall, B.L., Martin, W., Neven, L. (eds.) Socio-Gerontechnology – Interdisciplinary Critical Studies of Ageing and Technology. 1st.ed. Routledge (2021)
Royakkers, L., van Est, R.: van Est R: a literature review on new robotics: automation from love to war. Int. JN Soc. Robot. 7, 549–570 (2015)
Van Aerschot, L, Parvaiainen, J.: Robots responding to care needs? A multitasking care robot pursued for 25 years, available products offer simple entertainment and instrumental assistance. Ethics and Information Technology (2020)
Turja, T., Taipale, S., Kaakinen, M., Oksanen, A.: Care workers readiness for robotization: identifying psychological and socio-demographic determinants. Int. J. Soc. Robot. (2019)
Decker, M., et al.: Service robotics: do you know your new companion? Framing an interdisciplinary technology assessment. Poiesis Prax 8, 25–44 (2011)
Jones, R.A.: What makes a robot social? Soc. Stud. Sci. 47(4), 556–579 (2017)
Turja, T,. Aaltonen, L., Tapipale, S., Oksanen A.: Robot acceptance model for care (RAM-care): a principled approach to the intention to use care robots. Inf. Manage. (2019)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Östlund, B. (2021). Digitalization of Later Life: What Prevents the Care Sector from Meeting the Rapid Digitalization of Older Populations?. In: Kalra, J., Lightner, N.J., Taiar, R. (eds) Advances in Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare and Medical Devices. AHFE 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 263. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80744-3_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80744-3_36
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80743-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80744-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)