Skip to main content

Comparison of Consolidation Methods for Predictive Learning of Time Series

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances and Trends in Artificial Intelligence. Artificial Intelligence Practices (IEA/AIE 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 12798))

Abstract

In environments where various tasks are sequentially given to deep neural networks (DNNs), training methods are needed that enable DNNs to learn the given tasks continuously. A DNN is typically trained by a single dataset, and continuous learning of subsequent datasets causes the problem of catastrophic forgetting. Previous studies have reported results for consolidation learning methods in recognition tasks and reinforcement learning problems. However, those methods were validated on only a few examples of predictive learning for time series. In this study, we applied elastic weight consolidation (EWC) and pseudo-rehearsal to the predictive learning of time series and compared their learning results. Evaluating the latent space after the consolidation learning revealed that the EWC method acquires properties of the pre-training and subsequent datasets with the same distribution, and the pseudo-rehearsal method distinguishes the properties and acquires them with different distributions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Atkinson, C., McCane, B., Szymanski, L., Robins, A.: Pseudo-rehearsal: achieving deep reinforcement learning without catastrophic forgetting. Neurocomputing 428, 291–307 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2020.11.050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ha, D., Eck, D.: A neural representation of sketch drawings. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ho, J., Ermon, S.: Generative adversarial imitation learning. In: Lee, D., Sugiyama, M., Luxburg, U., Guyon, I., Garnett, R. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 29. Curran Associates, Inc. (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hou, S., Pan, X., Loy, C.C., Wang, Z., Lin, D.: Lifelong learning via progressive distillation and retrospection. In: Proceedings of European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 437–452 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jongejan, J., Rowley, H., Kawashima, T., Kim, J., Thomson, R., Fox-Gieg, N.: Quick, Draw! (2016). https://quickdraw.withgoogle.com

  6. Kirkpatrick, J., et al.: Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114(13), 3521–3526 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1611835114

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Koch, G., Zemel, R., Salakhutdinov, R.: Siamese neural networks for one-shot image recognition. In: ICML Deep Learning Workshop, vol. 2 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Robins, A.: Catastrophic forgetting, rehearsal and pseudorehearsal. Connect. Sci. 7(2), 123–146 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1080/09540099550039318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rusu, A.A., et al.: Progressive neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.04671 (2016)

  10. Schroff, F., Kalenichenko, D., Philbin, J.: FaceNet: a unified embedding for face recognition and clustering. In: 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 815–823 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298682

  11. Schwarz, J., et al.: Progress & compress: a scalable framework for continual learning. In: 35th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2018), vol. 10, pp. 7199–7208 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryoichi Nakajo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nakajo, R., Ogata, T. (2021). Comparison of Consolidation Methods for Predictive Learning of Time Series. In: Fujita, H., Selamat, A., Lin, J.CW., Ali, M. (eds) Advances and Trends in Artificial Intelligence. Artificial Intelligence Practices. IEA/AIE 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12798. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79457-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79457-6_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-79456-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-79457-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics