Skip to main content

Sharing is Learning: Using Topic Modelling to Understand Online Comments Shared by Learners

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI International 2021 - Posters (HCII 2021)

Abstract

Learners have utilised coding video tutorials to learn new programming languages or enhance their existing skillset. Past studies have focused on content creators’ perspective (e.g. motivation to produce video tutorials) or understanding the learner perspective focusing on the outcome of the learning. However, the research on the learning process focusing on learners’ sharing behaviour when and after watching the video tutorial was limited. This study aims to address this gap by analysing learners’ online comments shared on the video hosting platform to infer learning behaviour from the self-regulated learning perspective. Learners’ comments from 24 video tutorials were collected from a popular YouTube coding channel and analysed using the probabilistic topic modelling method. Ten latent topics were uncovered. The findings indicated the presence of three self-regulated learning behaviours. Interestingly, the learners’ comments comprised a high proportion of comments related to sharing of coding-related questions, suggesting that learners not only use the commenting platform to provide feedback but also as a means to seek clarification. In addition, this finding also informed the content creators on the areas to engage the learners or refine course content.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Poché, E., Jha, N., Williams, G., Staten, J., Vesper, M., Mahmoud, A.: Analyzing user comments on YouTube coding tutorial videos. In: IEEE/ACM 25th International Conference on Program Comprehension, Buenos Aires, pp. 196–206 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPC.2017.26

  2. Storey, M.-A., Singer, L., Cleary, B., Figueira Filho, F., Zagalsky, A.: The revolution of social media in software engineering. In: FOSE 2014: Future of Software Engineering Proceedings, New York, USA, pp. 100–116 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2593882.2593887

  3. van der Meij, J., van der Meij, H.: A test of the design of a video tutorial for software training. J. Comput. Assist Learn. 31(2) (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12082

  4. Carlisle, M.: Using YouTube to enhance student class preparation in an introductory Java course. In: SIGCSE 2010: Proceedings of the 41st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, New York, USA, pp. 470–474 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1734263.1734419

  5. MacLeod, L., Bergen, A., Storey, M.-A.: Documenting and sharing software knowledge using screencasts. Empir. Softw. Eng. 22(3), 1478–1507 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-017-9501-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dubovi, I., Tabak, I.: An empirical analysis of knowledge co-construction in YouTube comments. Comput. Educ. 156, 103939 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhou, Q., Lee, C.S., Sin, S.C.J., Lin, S., Hu, H., Ismail, M.F.: Understanding the use of YouTube as a learning resource: A social cognitive perspective. Aslib J. Inf. Manag. 72(3), 339–359 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-10-2019-0290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee, C.S., Osop, H., Goh, D., Kelni, G.: Making sense of comments on YouTube educational videos: a self-directed learning perspective. Online Inf. Rev. 41(5), 611–625 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-09-2016-0274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Obadimu, A., Mead, E., Hussain, M.N., Agarwal, N.: Identifying toxicity within YouTube video comment. In: Thomson, R., Bisgin, H., Dancy, C., Hyder, A. (eds.) SBP-BRiMS 2019. LNCS, vol. 11549, pp. 214–223. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21741-9_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Siersdorfer, S., Nejdl, W., Pedro, J.S.: How useful are your comments? Analyzing and predicting YouTube comments and comment rating. In: WWW 2010: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1772690.1772781

  11. Teng, S., Khong, K.W., Sharif, S.P., Ahmed, A.: YouTube video comments on healthy eating: descriptive and predictive analysis. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 6(4) (2020). https://doi.org/10.2196/19618

  12. Johnson, G., Davies, S.: Self-regulated learning in digital environments: theory, research, praxis. Br. J. Res. 1(2), 1–14 (2014). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/45935

  13. Zhou, Q., Lee, C.S., Sin, S.C.J.: Using social media in formal learning: investigating learning strategies and satisfaction. Proc. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 54(1), 472–482 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2017.14505401051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Brook, J.: The affordances of YouTube for language learning and teaching. Hawaii Pacific University TESOL Working Paper Series 9(2), 37–56 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Burke, S., Snyder, S.: YouTube: an innovative learning resource for college health education courses. Int. Electron. J. Health Educ. 11, 39–46 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ellmann, M., Oeser, A., Fucci, D., Maalej, W.: Find, understand, and extend development screencasts on YouTube. In: SWAN 2017: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSOFT International Workshop on Software Analytics, New York, USA, pp. 1–7 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3121257.3121260

  17. MacLeod, L., Storey, M.A., Bergen, A.: Code, camera, action: how software developers document and share program knowledge using YouTube. In: Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension, Florence, Italy, pp. 104–114 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPC.2015.19

  18. Kim, J., Guo, P.J., Cai, C.J., Li, S.W., Gajos, K.Z., Miller, R.C.: Data-driven interaction techniques for improving navigation of educational videos. In: UIST 2014: Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, New York, USA, pp. 563–572 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2642918.2647389

  19. Pavel, A., Reed, C., Hartmann, B., Agrawala, M.: Video digests: a browsable, skimmable format for informational lecture videos. In: UIST 2014: Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, New York, USA, pp. 573–582 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2642918.2647400

  20. Swan, K.: Research on online learning. J. Asynchronous Learn. Netw. 11(1), 55–59 (2007). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v11i1.1736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jansen, R.S., van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., Conijn, R., Kester, L.: Supporting learners’ self-regulated learning in massive open online courses. Comput. Educ. 146 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103771

  22. Wong, J., Baars, M., Davis, D., Van Der Zee, T., Houben, G., Paas, F.: Supporting self- regulated learning in online learning environments and MOOCs: a systematic review. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 35(4–5), 356–373 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1543084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Barnard, L., Lan, W.Y., To, Y.M., Paton, V.O., Lai, S.L.: Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. Internet High. Educ. 12, 1–6 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zimmerman, B.J.: Academic study and the development of personal skill: a self- regulatory perspective. Educ. Psychol. 33(2), 73–86 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1998.9653292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Araka, E., Maina, E., Gitonga, R., Oboko, R.: Research trends in measurement and intervention tools for self-regulated learning for e-learning environments—systematic review (2008–2018). Res. Pract. Technol. Enhanc. Learn. 15(1), 1–21 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-020-00129-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Naab, T.K., Sehl, A.: Studies of user-generated content: a systematic review. Journalism 18(10), 1256–1273 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916673557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yoo, K.H., Gretzel, U.: What motivates consumers to write online travel reviews? Inf. Technol. Tour. 10(4), 283–295 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3727/109830508788403114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Boyd, D.M., Ellison, N.B.: Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 13(1) (2007). https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2010.5559139

  29. Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Airoldi, E.M.: The structural topic model and applied social science. Neural Information Processing Society (2013). http://scholar.harvard.edu/dtingley/node/132666

  30. Blei, D.M., Ng, A., Jordan, M.: Latent dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 993–1022 (2003). https://www.jmlr.org/papers/volume3/blei03a/blei03a.pdf

  31. Reich, J., Tingley, D., Leder-Luis, J., Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.: Computer-assisted reading and discovery for student senerated text in massive open online courses. J. Learn. Anal. 2(1), 156–184 (2014). https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2015.21.8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mimno, D., Wallach, H.M., Talley, E., Leenders, M., McCallum, A.: Optimizing semantic coherence in topic models. In: EMNLP 2011: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 262–272. Association for Computational Linguistics (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Vilkova, K., Shcheglova, I.: Deconstructing self-regulated learning in MOOCs: in search of help-seeking mechanisms. Educ. Inf. Technol. 26(1), 17–33 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10244-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kok Khiang Lim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

See Table A-1.

Table A-1. Topic modelling results from YouTube comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lim, K.K., Lee, C.S. (2021). Sharing is Learning: Using Topic Modelling to Understand Online Comments Shared by Learners. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S. (eds) HCI International 2021 - Posters. HCII 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1421. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78645-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78645-8_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78644-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78645-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics