Skip to main content

A Method Framework for Design Science Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
An Introduction to Design Science
  • 2766 Accesses

Abstract

In order to produce reliable results, design science researchers need to make use of research strategies and methods and to base their work on a scientific body of knowledge. This chapter proposes a method framework for design science research that can support researchers in producing relevant as well as rigorous research. Five key activities are identified: problem explication, requirements definition, design and development, demonstration, and evaluation. Two tools for visualizing the design science process are introduced, an IDEF0 process diagram and a canvas format. Finally, we discuss the relationships between the proposed framework and the scientific method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alturki A, Gable GG, Bandara W (2011) A design science research roadmap. In: Jain H, Sinha AP, Vitharana P (eds) Service-oriented perspectives in design science research. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin, pp. 107–123

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Alturki A, Gable G, Bandara W (2013) The design science research roadmap: in progress evaluation. In: PACIS 2013 proceedings

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck R, Weber S, Gregory RW (2013) Theory-generating design science research. Inf. Syst. Front. 15(4):637–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blessing LTM, Chakrabarti A (2009) DRM, a design research methodology, 2009th edn. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eekels J, Roozenburg NFM (1991) A methodological comparison of the structures of scientific research and engineering design: their similarities and differences. Des Stud 12(4):197–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fips (1993) Integration definition for function modeling (IDEF0), Draft federal information processing standards, publication 183. www.idef.com/downloads/pdf/idef0.pdf. Accessed July 3 2014

  • Fischer C, Gregor S (2011) Forms of reasoning in the design science research process. In: Jain H, Sinha A, Vitharana P (eds) Service-oriented perspectives in design science research, vol. 6629. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin, pp 17–31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gimbel S (2011) Exploring the scientific method: cases and questions. University Of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goldkuhl G, Lind M (2010) A multi-grounded design research process. In: Winter R, Zhao JL, Aier S (eds) Global perspectives on design science research. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin, pp. 45–60

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goldkuhl G, Sjöström J (2018) Design science in the field: practice design research. In: Designing for a digital and globalized world. Springer, Berlin, pp 67–81

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory RW (2011) Design science research and the grounded theory method: characteristics, differences, and complementary uses. In: A. Heinzl et al (eds) Theory-guided modeling and empiricism in information systems research. Physica-Verlag HD, pp 111–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Hevner AR et al (2004) Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 28(1):75–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuechler B, Vaishnavi V (2008) On theory development in design science research: anatomy of a research project. Eur J Inf Syst 17(5):489–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenney S, Reeves TC (2014) Educational design research. In: Michael Spector J et al. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. Springer, New York, pp. 131–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunamaker Jr J, Twyman N, Giboney J (2013) Breaking out of the design science box: high-value impact through multidisciplinary design science programs of research. In: AMCIS 2013 proceedings

    Google Scholar 

  • Peffers K et al (2007) A design science research methodology for information systems research. J Manag Inf Syst 24(3):45–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohde M et al Grounded design – a praxeological IS research per spective. J. Inf. Technol. Impact 32(2):163–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Sein M et al (2011) Action design research. Manag Inf Syst Quart 35(1):37–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Johannesson, P., Perjons, E. (2021). A Method Framework for Design Science Research. In: An Introduction to Design Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78132-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78132-3_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78131-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78132-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics