Abstract
It may seem that the proposed method framework is similar to the waterfall model of systems and software development. This chapter shows that this is not the case and that the framework allows for highly iterative ways of working. We introduce a distinction between temporal and logical orderings of work, where the former refers to the temporal and sequential order of activities and the latter to input-output relationships. This distinction helps to clarify the kinds of relationships that exist between activities in design science research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Beck K, Beedle M (2001) The Agile manifesto. http://agilemanifesto.org/. Accessed 26 Jun 2014
Dennis A, Wixom BH, Roth RM (2018) Systems analysis and design, 7th edn. Wiley, Hoboken
Dix A (2007) Designing for appropriation. In: Proceedings of the 21st British HCI group annual conference on people and computers: HCI...but not as we know it - volume 2. BCS-HCI ’07. British Computer Society, Swinton, pp 27–30
Kroll P, Kruchten P (2003) The rational unified process made easy: a practitioner’s guide to the RUP. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Johannesson, P., Perjons, E. (2021). Systems Development and the Method Framework for Design Science Research. In: An Introduction to Design Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78132-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78132-3_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78131-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78132-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)