Abstract
The ability to solve problems is increasingly important in today’s world, not only for good school performance but also to be successful in today’s world, being one of the most desired skills for the XXI century. However, the existence of tasks with an inadequate cognitive load may discourage the individuals involved in it. Thus, we believe that the effective monitoring of this capacity must be well monitored. To this end, we started an experiment made up of 2 different samples to assess the ability to solve logical problems through the testing of Raven’s Progressive Matrices. The research project developed and presented in this paper sought to assess differences in the ability to solve logical problems considering brain activity when solving them. Therefore, EEG was used to infer the cognitive workload of individuals. Our main interest was to identify specific ERP waveforms, namely the feedback-related negativity (FRN) component about the correctness of the students answers to each question.
The analysis presented in this work shows that it is possible to find the FRN potential associated to a greater negativity meaning a greater astonishment for an unconsciousness of the wrong answer. Therefore, this aspect is related with the performance of the participant based on their knowledge of the abstract principle underlying the task. Despite having only 2 samples with few students, these data indicate that our findings demonstrate that cognitive load can be predicted using these features, even using a low number of channels.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Koczwara, A., Patterson, F., Zibarras, L., Kerrin, M., Irish, B., Wilkinson, M.: Evaluating cognitive ability, knowledge tests and situational judgement tests for postgraduate selection. Med Educ. 46, 399–408 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04195.x
Rindermann, H., Neubauer, A.: Processing speed, intelligence, creativity, and school performance: testing of causal hypotheses using structural equation models. Intelligence 32, 573–589 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2004.06.005
Wang, T., Ren, X., Altmeyer, M., Schweizer, K.: An account of the relationship between fluid intelligence and complex learning in considering storage capacity and executive attention. Intelligence 41, 537–545 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.07.008
Kumar, N., Kumar, J.: Measurement of cognitive load in HCI systems using EEG power spectrum: an experimental study. Procedia Comput. Sci. 84, 70–78 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.04.068. ISSN 1877-0509
Young, J.Q., Irby, D.M., Barilla-LaBarca, M.-L., et al.: Measuring cognitive load: mixed results from a handover simulation for medical students. Perspect. Med. Educ. 5(1), 24–32 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-015-0240-6
Gomes, A., Assuncao Teixeira, A.R.A., Eloy, J., Mendes, A.J.: An Exploratory study of brain computer interfaces in computer science education. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana De Tecnologias Del Aprendizaje-Ieee Rita, 14(4), 152–161 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/rita.2019.2952273
Penrose, L.S., Raven, J.C.: A new series of perceptual tests: preliminary communication. Br. J. Med. Psychol. 16(2), 97–104 (1936)
Raven, J.: The raven progressive matrices tests: their theoretical basis and measurement model, chapter 1 (2016)
Raven, J.: The raven’s progressive matrices: change and stability over culture and time. Cogn. Psychol. 41, 1–48 (2000)
Spearman, C.: “General intelligence,” objectively determined and measured. Am. J. Psychol. 15(2), 201 (1904)
Binet, A.: New methods for the diagnosis of the intellectual level of subnormals. L’Annee Psychologique 12, 191–244 (1905)
Thatcher, R.W., North, D., Biver, C.: EEG and intelligence: relations between EEG coherence, EEG phase delay and power. Clin. Neurophysiol. 116, 2129–2141 (2005)
Neubauer, A.C., Grabner, R.H., Fink, A., Neuper, C.: Intelligence and neural efficiency: further evidence of the influence of task content and sex on the brain-IQ relationship. Cogn. Brain Res. 25, 217–225 (2005)
Fink, A., Neubauer, A.: EEG alpha oscillations during the performance of verbal creativity tasks: differential effects of sex and verbal intelligence. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 62(1), 46–53 (2006)
Miltner, W.H.R., Braun, C.H., Coles, M.G.H.: Event-related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: evidence for a ‘generic’ neural system for error detection. Cogn. Neurosci. 9(6), 788–798 (1997)
Santos, I.M., et al.: ERP correlates of error processing during performance on the Halstead category test. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 106, 97–105 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.06.010
Ferrez, W., Millán, J.D.R.: Error-related EEG potentials generated during simulated brain-computer interaction. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 55(3), 923–929 (2008)
Emotiv (2021). https://www.emotiv.com/product/emotiv-epoc-14-channel-mobileeeg/. Accessed 25 Jan 2021
Delorme, A., Makeig, S.: EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J. Neurosci. Methods 134, 9–2 (2004)
Sanei, S., Chambers, J.A.: EEG Signal Processing (2013). ISBN 9780470025819. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470511923
Kappenman, E.S., Luck, S.J.: The Oxford Handbook of Event-Related Potential Components (2012). ISBN 9780199940356. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195374148.001.0001
Walsh, M.M., Anderson, J.R.: Learning from experience: event-related potential correlates of reward processing, neural adaptation, and behavioral choice. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 36, 1870–1884 (2012)
Zander, T.O., Kothe, C.: Towards passive brain-computer interfaces: applying brain-computer interface technology to human-machine systems in general. J. Neural Eng. 8(2) (2011). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/8/2/025005.025005
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Teixeira, A.R., Rodrigues, I., Gomes, A., Abreu, P., Rodríguez-Bermúdez, G. (2021). Using Brain Computer Interaction to Evaluate Problem Solving Abilities. In: Schmorrow, D.D., Fidopiastis, C.M. (eds) Augmented Cognition. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12776. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78114-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78114-9_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78113-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78114-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)