Abstract
In a system that combines elements of adaptive instruction and assessment, misalignment at the intersection of instruction and assessment and assessment quality issues can result in poor learner experience and faulty system recommendations and prescriptions. This paper contains elements relevant for the detection and remediation of such issues in an online hybrid instructional and assessment system. The first section presents motivation of this research, and the advantage we can expect when we address misalignment and quality issues. The second section describes an exemplar hybrid adaptive instruction and assessment system which includes the following components: adaptive instruction, practice, mastery quiz, progress check, and adaptive diagnostic assessments. The potential for and impact of alignment and quality issues in the progress check, which measures students’ skill mastery for an adaptive loop, is described. The third section proposes psychometric methods that may be appropriate for the detection of misalignment and quality. The fourth section includes an empirical example of the proposed method with data from a production hybrid system, comments on the perceived utility of the procedure to date, outlines a workflow used to implement the processes from data analysis to dynamic result reporting, and presents a view of a dashboard used to increase collaboration among psychometric and content experts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bloom, B.S.: Learning for mastery. instruction and curriculum. regional education laboratory for the Carolinas and Virginia, topical papers and reprints, number 1. Eval. Comment 1(2), n2 (1968)
Briggs, D.C., Diaz-Bilello, E., Peck, F., Alzen, J., Chattergoon, R., Johnson, R.: Using a learning progression framework to assess and evaluate student growth. National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment (2015)
Bruner, J.S., et al.: Toward a Theory of Instruction, vol. 59. Harvard University, Cambridge (1966, in Press)
Carroll, J.B.: The carroll model: a 25-year retrospective and prospective view. Educ. Researcher 18(1), 26–31 (1989)
Cheung, A.C.K., Slavin, R.E.: The effectiveness of education technology for enhancing reading achievement: a meta-analysis. Center for Research and reform in Education (2011)
Collins, A., Brown, J.S., Newman, S.E.: Cognitive apprenticeship: teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics. Thinking J. Philos. Child. 8(1), 2–10 (1988). https://doi.org/10.5840/thinking19888129
Crocker, L., Algina, J.: Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. ERIC (1986)
Durlach, P.J., Spain, R.D.: Framework for instructional technology: methods of implementing adaptive training and education. Technical report, Army Research Inst for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Fort Belvoir, VA (2014). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4075.8247
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Early progress: Interim research on personalized learning (2014)
Livingston, S.A.: Criterion-referenced applications of classical test theory 1, 2. J. Educat. Measur. 9(1), 13–26 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1972.tb00756.x
Marion, S., Thompson, J., Evans, C., Martineau, J., Dadey, N.: A tricky balance: the challenges and opportunities of balanced systems of assessment. Center for Assessment. Systems of Assessment. NCME 3(13/19), 1 (2019)
Pane, J.F., Steiner, E.D., Baird, M.D., Hamilton, L.S.: Continued progress: promising evidence on personalized learning. Rand Corporation (2015). https://doi.org/10.7249/j.ctt19w724m
Pea, R.D.: The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. J. learn. Sci. 13(3), 423–451 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1303_6
Acknowledgements
The author is grateful to Dr. David King for his thoughtful review and comments during the preparation of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Choi, J., Barrett, M.D. (2021). Dynamic Analytics for the Detection of Quality and Alignment Issues in an Online Hybrid Adaptive Instructional and Assessment System. In: Sottilare, R.A., Schwarz, J. (eds) Adaptive Instructional Systems. Adaptation Strategies and Methods. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12793. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77873-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77873-6_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77872-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77873-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)