Skip to main content

Dynamic Analytics for the Detection of Quality and Alignment Issues in an Online Hybrid Adaptive Instructional and Assessment System

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Adaptive Instructional Systems. Adaptation Strategies and Methods (HCII 2021)

Abstract

In a system that combines elements of adaptive instruction and assessment, misalignment at the intersection of instruction and assessment and assessment quality issues can result in poor learner experience and faulty system recommendations and prescriptions. This paper contains elements relevant for the detection and remediation of such issues in an online hybrid instructional and assessment system. The first section presents motivation of this research, and the advantage we can expect when we address misalignment and quality issues. The second section describes an exemplar hybrid adaptive instruction and assessment system which includes the following components: adaptive instruction, practice, mastery quiz, progress check, and adaptive diagnostic assessments. The potential for and impact of alignment and quality issues in the progress check, which measures students’ skill mastery for an adaptive loop, is described. The third section proposes psychometric methods that may be appropriate for the detection of misalignment and quality. The fourth section includes an empirical example of the proposed method with data from a production hybrid system, comments on the perceived utility of the procedure to date, outlines a workflow used to implement the processes from data analysis to dynamic result reporting, and presents a view of a dashboard used to increase collaboration among psychometric and content experts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bloom, B.S.: Learning for mastery. instruction and curriculum. regional education laboratory for the Carolinas and Virginia, topical papers and reprints, number 1. Eval. Comment 1(2), n2 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Briggs, D.C., Diaz-Bilello, E., Peck, F., Alzen, J., Chattergoon, R., Johnson, R.: Using a learning progression framework to assess and evaluate student growth. National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bruner, J.S., et al.: Toward a Theory of Instruction, vol. 59. Harvard University, Cambridge (1966, in Press)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carroll, J.B.: The carroll model: a 25-year retrospective and prospective view. Educ. Researcher 18(1), 26–31 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cheung, A.C.K., Slavin, R.E.: The effectiveness of education technology for enhancing reading achievement: a meta-analysis. Center for Research and reform in Education (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Collins, A., Brown, J.S., Newman, S.E.: Cognitive apprenticeship: teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics. Thinking J. Philos. Child. 8(1), 2–10 (1988). https://doi.org/10.5840/thinking19888129

  7. Crocker, L., Algina, J.: Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. ERIC (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Durlach, P.J., Spain, R.D.: Framework for instructional technology: methods of implementing adaptive training and education. Technical report, Army Research Inst for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Fort Belvoir, VA (2014). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4075.8247

  9. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Early progress: Interim research on personalized learning (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Livingston, S.A.: Criterion-referenced applications of classical test theory 1, 2. J. Educat. Measur. 9(1), 13–26 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1972.tb00756.x

  11. Marion, S., Thompson, J., Evans, C., Martineau, J., Dadey, N.: A tricky balance: the challenges and opportunities of balanced systems of assessment. Center for Assessment. Systems of Assessment. NCME 3(13/19), 1 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pane, J.F., Steiner, E.D., Baird, M.D., Hamilton, L.S.: Continued progress: promising evidence on personalized learning. Rand Corporation (2015). https://doi.org/10.7249/j.ctt19w724m

  13. Pea, R.D.: The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. J. learn. Sci. 13(3), 423–451 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1303_6

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author is grateful to Dr. David King for his thoughtful review and comments during the preparation of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinah Choi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Choi, J., Barrett, M.D. (2021). Dynamic Analytics for the Detection of Quality and Alignment Issues in an Online Hybrid Adaptive Instructional and Assessment System. In: Sottilare, R.A., Schwarz, J. (eds) Adaptive Instructional Systems. Adaptation Strategies and Methods. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12793. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77873-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77873-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77872-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77873-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics