Abstract
The purpose of this chapter is to examine the promises of action research to develop Persian for academic purposes (PAP) teachers’ professionalism. To that end, the critical characteristics of action research have been reviewed in this chapter. Then, teaching PAP features have been addressed through the main features of teaching languages for academic purposes proposed by Hyland (Teaching languages for academic purposes, The encyclopedia of applied linguistics, pp. 1–4, 2013). Later on, the promises that action research can have for PAP teacher education are discussed. Finally, based on the discussions, a model has been proposed to address action research in PAP teacher education programs. The model, metaphorically, uses action research as its engine to provide energy for developing PAP teachers’ critical thinking abilities, doing reflective practices, and raising their consciousness about different issues in PAP. Based on the proposed model, collaboration can be done among different PAP genres by engaging PAP teachers in action research. In the concluding remarks, I discuss the importance of providing internal and external supports for PAP teachers by PAP teacher educators and decision-makers to engage PAP teachers in action research and to develop their professionalism through action research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Adelman, C. (1993). Kurt Lewin and the origins of action research. Educational Action Research, 1(1), 7–24.
Alexander, C., Fox, J., & Gutierrez, A. (2019). Conceptualising teacher professionalism. In A. Gutierrez, J. Fox, & C. Alexander (Eds.), Professionalism and teacher education: Voices from policy and practice (pp. 1–23). Springer.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C. K., & Walker, D. (2014). Introduction to Research in Education (9th ed.). Cengage.
Ax, J., Ponte, P., & Brouwer, N. (2008). Action research in initial teacher education: An explorative study. Educational Action Research, 16(1), 55–72.
Belcher, D. (Ed.). (2009). English for specific purposes in theory and practice. University of Michigan Press.
Borg, S. (2017). Action research and teacher identity. The 2016 Cambridge English/English UK Action Research Scheme, 2.
Britzman, D. P. (2012). Practice makes practice: A critical study of learning to teach. Suny Press.
Burns, A. (2010). Action research in second language teacher education: The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education. Routledge.
Child, A. J., & Merrill, S. J. (2003). Professional mentors’ perceptions of the contribution of school/HEI partnerships to professional development and school improvement. Journal of In-Service Education, 29(2), 315–324.
Dikilitaş, K. (Ed.). (2014). Professional development through teacher research. Gediz University Press.
Dikilitaş, K., & Griffiths, C. (2017). Developing language teacher autonomy through action research. Springer.
Goodnough, K. (2010). The role of action research in transforming teacher identity: Modes of belonging and ecological perspectives. Educational Action Research, 18(2), 167–182.
Halai, A. (2006). Mentoring in-service teachers: Issues of role diversity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(6), 700–710.
Hancock, R. (2001). Why are class teachers reluctant to become researchers? In J. Soler, A. Craft, & H. Burgess (Eds.), Teacher development: Exploring our own practice (pp. 119–132). Paul Chapman.
Hensen, K. T. (1996). Teachers as researchers. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 53–66). Macmillan.
Hine, G. S. C. (2013). The importance of action research in teacher education programs. Issues in Educational Research, 23(2), 151–163.
Hyland, K. (2009). Academic discourse. Continuum.
Hyland, K. (2013). Teaching languages for academic purposes. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1–4). Wiley.
Johnson, K. E. (2009). Second language teacher education: A sociocultural perspective. Routledge.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (Eds.). (1988). The action research planner. Deakin University Press.
Leung, C. (2009). Second language teacher professionalism. In A. Burns & J. C. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education (pp. 49–58). Cambridge University Press.
López-Facal, R., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2009). Identities, social representations and critical thinking. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4(3), 689–695.
Maheshwari, V. K. (2015). Action research in education. Retrieved from http://www.vkmaheshwari.com/WP/?p=402
Malderez, A., & Bodóczky, C. (1999). Mentor courses: A resource book for trainer trainers. Cambridge University Press.
McNiff, J. (2013). Action research: Principles and practice. Routledge.
Mertler, C. A. (2009). Action research: Teachers as researchers in the classroom. Sage.
Mizza, D., & Esmaili-Sardari, M. (2020). The Persian language educator’s role in developing effective blended language learning: From principles to practice. In P. Shabani-Jadidi (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and pedagogy of Persian (pp. 347–369). Routledge.
Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge University Press.
Paltridge, B. (2001). Genre and the language learning classroom. University of Michigan Press.
Robson, J. (2006). Teacher professionalism in further and higher education: Challenges to culture and practice. Psychology Press.
Shabani-Jadidi, P. (Ed.). (2020). The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and pedagogy of Persian. Routledge.
Sachs, J. (2003). The activist teaching profession. Open University.
Thomas, R. M. (2005). Teachers doing research: An introductory guidebook. Pearson Education.
Trent, J. (2010). Teacher education as identity construction: Insights from action research. Journal of Education for Teaching, 36(2), 153–168.
Troman, G. (1996). The rise of the new professionals? The restructuring of primary teachers’ work and professionalism. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 17(4), 473–487.
Wang, Q., & Zhang, H. (2014). Promoting teacher autonomy through university–school collaborative action research. Language Teaching Research, 18(2), 222–241.
Weaver-Hightower, M. B. (2008). An ecology metaphor for educational policy analysis: A call to complexity. Educational Researcher, 37(3), 153–167.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge university press.
Winter, R. (1989). Learning from experience: Principles and practice in action-research. Falmer Pr.
Yuan, R., & Burns, A. (2017). Teacher identity development through action research: A Chinese experience. Teachers and Teaching, 23(6), 729–749.
Yuan, R., & Lee, I. (2015). Action research facilitated by university–school collaboration. ELT Journal, 69(1), 1–10.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Meihami, H. (2021). The Promises of Action Research to Develop Persian for Academic Purposes Teachers’ Professionalism. In: Aghdassi, A. (eds) Perspectives on Academic Persian. Language Policy, vol 25. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75610-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75610-9_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-75609-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-75610-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)