Abstract
Port-city interfaces, near urban centers, are under intense land pressure within the context of increased competition for the development of these sites. Some interfaces are wastelands, induced by the remoteness of port installations from urban centers. For other interfaces, the word “wasteland” can be instrumentalized by planners to reallocate underused, yet active, port spaces. This paper aims to highlight the points of view of users, mostly inhabitants of these neighborhoods, in Brussels and Lille, based on a study of territorial representations. This study shows that these representations are clearly different from the conflictual environment of decision-making. The representation of a “quiet space” and a “breathing, natural space,” for leisure and relaxation, dominates the discourse of users. These representations make sense in very densely built environments, which are landlocked by the passage of major transport infrastructures. This desire for temporary withdrawal can be related to moments allowing daily pressures to be relieved. The development of port-city interfaces as true interstitial breathing spaces within urbanized spaces could be explored for planners.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bailleul H (2008) Les nouvelles formes de la communication autour des projets urbains: modalités, impacts, enjeux pour un débat participatif [New forms of communication around urban projects: modalities, impacts, stakes for a participative debate]. Métropoles 3. https://metropoles.revues.org/2202
Bailly A (1995) Les représentations en géographie [Representations in geography]. In: Bailly A, Ferras R, Pumain D (eds) Encyclopédie de la géographie. Economica, pp 369–381
Baudouin T, Collin M (1996) L’après friches portuaires [The post-harbour wastelands]. Urbanisme 291:24–32
Bétin C, Cottet-Dumoulin L (1999) Mémoire fluviale, Planification stratégique, Le cas d’Oullins dans l’agglomération lyonnaise [Fluvial memory, strategic planning, the case of Oullins in the Lyon metropolitan area]. Annales De La Recherche Urbaine 82:118–129
Bird J (1963) The major seaports of the United Kingdom. Hutchinson
Blanchet A, Gotman A (2007) L’enquête et ses méthodes. L’entretien [Survey and its methods. The interview]. Armand Collin
Boubacha E, Davoult D, Gueguen E (1997) Ville et port mutation et recomposition. Note de synthèse et bibliographie [City and port mutation and recomposition. Summary note and bibliography]. Éditions Villes et territoires. https://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb370009731
Brun M, Di Pietro F, Bonthoux S (2018) Residents’ perceptions and valuations of urban wastelands are influenced by vegetation structure. Urban For Urban Green 29:393–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.01.005
Chaline C (1988) La reconversion des espaces fluvio-portuaires dans les grandes métropoles [The reconversion of fluvio-port spaces in large metropolises]. Annales De Géographie 544:695–715
Davezies L (2008) La République et ses territoires [The Republic and its territories]. Editions du Seuil
Dorso F (2012) Le pas de côté. Logiques de l’écart et régulations informelles dans l’espace urbain [The side step. Logics of the gap and informal regulations in urban space]. In: Boucher M, Malochet, V (eds) Regards croisés sur la régulation des désordres [Crossed views on the regulation of disorders]. L’Harmattan, pp 165–182
Farinella R (2005) I fiumi come infrstrutture culturali, Rivers as cultural infrastructures. Editrice Compositori
Fremont A (2011) Fleuve et métropole: la grande déconnexion [River and metropolis: the great disconnection]. Research program FLUIDE, Agence Nationale de la Recherche [National Research Agency], Paris-Est University, Unité Systèmes Productifs, Logistique, Organisation des Transports, Travail [Productive Systems, Logistics, Transport Organization, Labor Unit]
Haase D (2015) Reflections about blue ecosystem services in cities. Sustain Water Quality Ecol 5:77–83
Hall PV (2012) Connecting, disconnecting and reconnecting: port logistics and Vancouver’s Fraser river. L’espace Géographique 3(41):223–235
Hoyle BS (1989) The port city interface—trends, problems and examples. Geoforum 20(4):429–435
Kaplan R, Kaplan S, Ryan R (1998) With people in mind: design and management of everyday nature. Bibliovault OAI Repository, The University of Chicago Press
Lageiste J (2008) La plage, un objet géographique de désir [The beach as a geographical object of desire]. Géographie Et Cultures 67:7–26. https://doi.org/10.4000/gc.1002
Le Sueur B (1997) La voie d’eau, machine hydraulique, outil polyvalent d’aménagement du territoire [The waterway, hydraulic machine, multi-purpose tool for land use planning]. Annales De Géographie 106(593–594):195–204
Mazy K (2014) Villes et ports fluviaux: le projet comme dispositif de reconnexion ? Regards croisés sur Bruxelles et Lille [River cities and ports: the project as a re-connection device? Crossed views on Brussels and Lille]. PhD thesis, Free University of Bruxelles—University of Lille. https://www.theses.fr/2014LIL10049
Mazy K (2017) Rethinking the ties between Brussels and its port: a development issue for the canal area. Brussels Stud. https://doi.org/10.4000/brussels.1514
Mazy K, Debrie J (2018) La ville productive: un changement de paradigme pour le projet urbain ? L’exemple des interfaces ville-port [The productive city: a paradigm shift for the urban project? The example of city-port interfaces]. 20e Rencontres Internationales en Urbanisme “Que reste-t-il du projet?” [20th international meeting on urban planning “what remains of the project?”], Lille
Negura L (2006) L’analyse de contenu dans l’étude des représentations sociales [The content analysis in the study of social representations]. SociologieS, Théories et recherches
Paquot T (2016) Paysages et sentiments de la nature [Landscapes and feelings of nature]. In: Paquot T Le paysage [Landscape]. La Découverte, pp 45–68. https://www.cairn.info/Le-paysage--9782707166982.htm
Prelorenzo C (1999) Les édifices et espaces portuaires ou l’invitation à la grande dimension [Port buildings and spaces or the invitation to the big dimension]. Annales De La Recherche Urbaine 82:101–108
Robert A, Yengué JL (2018) Les citadins, un désir de nature «sous contrôle», «fleurie et propre» [City dwellers, a desire for a nature “under control,” “full of flowers and clean”]. Métropoles 22. https://doi.org/10.4000/metropoles.5619
Rosemberg-Lasorne M (1997) Marketing urbain et projet de ville: parole et représentations géographiques des acteurs [Urban marketing and city project: speech and geographical representations of the actors]. Cybergeo 32. https://cybergeo.revues.org/1977
Rupprecht C, Byrne J (2018) Informal urban green space as anti-gentrification strategy? In: Curran W, Hamilton T (eds) Just green enough, urban development and environmental gentrification. Taylor and Francis Group, pp 209–226
Subra P (2007) Géopolitique de l’aménagement du territoire [Geopolitics of land-use planning] (FRBNF411350770000008). Armand Colin
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mazy, K. (2021). Wastelands at Port-City Interfaces. The Search for Water Spaces to Evade the Constant Hustle and Bustle of City Life. In: Di Pietro, F., Robert, A. (eds) Urban Wastelands. Cities and Nature. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74882-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74882-1_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-74881-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-74882-1
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)