Abstract
Technical systems are being used more and more frequently to analyze physical workloads. However, suitable approaches to evaluate the measured exposures with regard to their health hazards are lacking.
New exposure indicators have been developed and evaluated, which allow a body region-specific risk assessment based on technically measured exposure parameters. The development and testing of the indicators was part of the MEGAPHYS project (multilevel risk assessment of physical exposures). Required exposure parameters were determined by kinematic, electromyography and heart rate recordings at 186 workplaces. Simultaneously, medical examinations of musculoskeletal complaints and diseases of 808 employees at these workplaces were conducted. Validity of the exposure indicators was checked by linking them to the results of the medical examinations.
Numerous plausible associations were identified between the exposure indicators and specific body region-related health outcomes. A comprehensive and evaluated concept for measurement-based risk assessment is now available. The exposure indicators are applicable for measuring systems at different levels of complexity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ranavolo, A., Draicchio, F., Varrecchia, T., Silvetti, A., Iavicoli, S.: Wearable monitoring devices for biomechanical risk assessment at work: current status and future challenges-A systematic review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15(9), 1–26 (2018)
Rhén, I.M., Forsman, M.: Inter- and intra-rater reliability of the OCRA checklist method in video-recorded manual work tasks. Appl. Ergon. 84, 103025 (2020)
Spielholz, P., Silverstein, B., Morgan, M., Checkoway, H., Kaufman, J.: Comparison of self-report, video observation and direct measurement methods for upper extremity musculoskeletal disorder physical risk factors. Ergonomics 44(6), 588–613 (2001)
Weber, B., Douwes, M., Forsman, M., Könemann, R., Heinrich, K., Enquist, H., Pinder, A., Punakallio, A., Uusitalo, A., Ditchen, D., Takala, E.P., Draicchio, F., Desbrosses, K., Wichtl, M., Strebl, M., Wærsted, M., Gupta, N., Lechner, N., Bayona, T., Hoehne-Hueckstaedt, U., Mathiassen, S.E., Holtermann, A., Veiersted, K.B.: Assessing Arm Elevation At Work With Technical Systems. Partnership for European Research in Occupational Safety and Health (PEROSH) (2018). https://doi.org/10.23775/20181201
ISO 11226: Ergonomics – Evaluation of static working postures. Beuth, Berlin (2000)
EN 1005–4: Safety of machinery - Human physical performance - Part 4: Evaluation of working postures and movements in relation to machinery. CEN, Brussels (2005)
ACGIH: 2018 TLVs® and BEIs®: based on the documentation of the threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agents & biological exposure indices. In: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH), Cincinnati, pp. 182–213 (2018)
Peppoloni, L., Filippeschi, A., Ruffaldi, E., Avizzano, C.A.: A novel wearable system for the online assessment of risk for biomechanical load in repetitive efforts. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 52, 1–11 (2016)
Vignais, N., Bernard, F., Touvenot, G., Sagot, J.C.: Physical risk factors identification based on body sensor network combined to videotaping. Appl. Ergon. 65, 410–417 (2017)
Balogh, I., Arvidsson, I., Björk, J., Hansson, G. Å., Ohlsson, K., Skerfving, S., Nordander, C.: Work-related neck and upper limb disorders - quantitative exposure-response relationships adjusted for personal characteristics and psychosocial conditions. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord. 20(1), 139:1–19 (2019)
DGUV: MEGAPHYS - Mehrstufige Gefährdungsanalyse physischer Belastungen am Arbeitsplatz. Volume 2. Deutsche Gesetzliche Unfallversicherung e.V. (DGUV), Berlin (2020). https://publikationen.dguv.de/widgets/pdf/download/article/3635
Ellegast, R.P., Hermanns, I., Schiefer, C.: Workload assessment in field using the ambulatory CUELA system. In: Duffy, F. (ed.) DIGITAL HUMAN MODELING, HCII 2009, LNCS 5620, pp. 221–226. Springer, Berlin (2009)
Seidel, D.H., Heinrich, K., Hermanns-Truxius, I., Ellegast, R., Barrero, L.H., Rieger, M.A., Steinhilber, B., Weber, B.: Assessment of work-related hand and elbow workloads using measurement-based TLV for HAL. Appl. Ergon. 92, 1–11 (2021)
Jäger, M., Luttmann, A., Göllner, R., Laurig, W.: The Dortmunder – Biomechanical model for quantification and assessment of the load on the lumbar spine. In: SAE Digital Human Modeling Conference Proceedings, paper 201–01–2085. Society of Automotive Engineers, Arlington VA (2001)
Jäger, M.: Extended compilation of autopsy-material measurements on lumbar ultimate compressive strength for deriving reference values in ergonomic work design: The Revised Dortmund Recommendations. EXCLI J. 17, 362–385 (2018)
Hansson, G., Balogh, I., Ohlsson, K., Skerfving, S.: Measurements of wrist and forearm positions and movements: effect of, and compensation for, goniometer crosstalk. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 14(3), 355–367 (2004)
Hansson, G., Balogh, I., Ohlsson, K., Granqvist, L., Nordander, C., Arvidsson, I., Akesson, I., Unge, J., Rittner, R., Strömberg, U., Skerfving, S.: Physical workload in various types of work: Part I. Wrist and forearm. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 39(1), 221–233 (2009)
Glitsch, U., Ditchen, D., Varady, P., Augat, P.: Analyse der Hüftgelenksbelastung bei beruflichen und außerberuflichen Tätigkeiten (IFA-Report 03/2016). Deutsche Gesetzliche Unfallversicherung e. V. (DGUV), Berlin (2016). https://publikationen.dguv.de/widgets/pdf/download/article/3113
BAuA: MEGAPHYS - Mehrstufige Gefährdungsanalyse physischer Belastungen am Arbeitsplatz. Volume 1. Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin (BAuA), Dortmund/Berlin/Dresden (2019). https://www.baua.de/DE/Angebote/Publikationen/Berichte/F2333.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=11
Klussmann, A., Liebers, F., Brandstaedt, F., Schust, M., Serafin, P., Schaefer, A., Gebhardt, H., Hartmann, B., Steinberg, U.: Validation of newly developed and redesigned key indicator methods for assessment of different working conditions with physical workloads based on mixed-methods design: a study protocol. BMJ Open, 7 (8/e015412), 1–12 (2017).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Weber, B. et al. (2022). Overview of Measurement-Based Assessment Approaches from the MEGAPHYS Project. In: Black, N.L., Neumann, W.P., Noy, I. (eds) Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021). IEA 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 223. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74614-8_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74614-8_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-74613-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-74614-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)