Skip to main content

Analysis of the Cost of Varying Levels of User Perceived Quality for Internet Access

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Computing and Optimization (ICO 2020)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1324))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1014 Accesses

Abstract

Quality of Service (QoS) metrics deal with network quantities, e.g. latency and loss, whereas Quality of Experience (QoE) provides a proxy metric for end-user experience. Many papers in the literature have proposed mappings between various QoS metrics and QoE. This paper goes further in providing analysis for QoE versus bandwidth cost. We measure QoE using the widely accepted Mean Opinion Score (MOS) rating. Our results naturally show that increasing bandwidth increases MOS. However, we extend this understanding by providing analysis for internet access scenarios, using TCP, and varying the number of TCP sources multiplexed together. For these target scenarios our analysis indicates what MOS increase we get by further expenditure on bandwidth. We anticipate that this will be of considerable value to commercial organizations responsible for bandwidth purchase and allocation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Quality of Experience Paradigm in Multimedia Services. ScienceDirect (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Streijl, R.C., Winkler, S., Hands, D.S.: Mean opinion score (MOS) revisited: methods and applications, limitations and alternatives. SpringerLink (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ahmad, N., Schormans, J., Wahab, A.: Variation in QoE of passive gaming video streaming for different packet loss ratios. In: QoMEX 2020- The 12th International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience, Athlone (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ahmad, N., Wahab, A., Schormans, J.: Importance of cross-correlation of QoS metrics in network emulators to evaluate QoE of video streaming applications. Bordeaux (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vasant, P., Zelinka, I., Weber, G. W.: Intelligent computing & optimization. in SpringerLink (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Camp, L.J., Gideon, Carolyn.: Limits to Certainty in QoS Pricing and Bandwidth. 22 July 2002. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/1512. Accessed 2 May 2020

  7. Xiao, X.: Technical, commercial and regulatory challenges of QoS. Amsterdam [u.a.]: Elsevier/Morgan Kaufmann, p.30. Zarki, M. (2019). QoS and QoE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Roshan, M., Schormans, J., Ogilvie, R.: Video-on-demand QoE evaluation across different age-groups and its significance for network capacity. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Mobile Communications and Applications, no. EAI (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gideon, C. (2002). Limits To Certainty in QoS Pricing and bandwidth. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/1512. Accessed 11 Aug 2019

  10. Internet Cost Structures and Interconnection Agreements. The journal of electronic publishing (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Joutsensalo, J., Hämäläinen, T.D., Siltanen, J., Luostarinen, K.: Delay guarantee and bandwidth allocation for network services. In: Next Generation Internet Networks, 2005 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Aragon, J.C.: Analysis of the correlation between packet loss and network delay and their impact in the performance of surgical training applications. In: Semantic Scholar (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ofcom (2017). International Communications Market Report 2017. London. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/research-and-data/multi-sector-research/cmr/cmr-2017/international. Accessed 7 Aug 2019

  14. Expert System (2017). What is Machine Learning? A definition - Expert System. Expertsystem.com. https://www.expertsystem.com/machine-learning-definition/. Accessed 6 Aug 2019

  15. Bisio, I., Marchese, M.: Analytical expression and performance evaluation of TCP packet loss probability over geostationary satellite. IEEE Commun. Lett. 8(4), 232–234 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cable.co.uk (2019). Best Broadband Deals August 2019 — Compare Broadband Offers - Cable.co.uk. Cable. https://www.cable.co.uk/broadband/. Accessed 16 Aug 2019

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Adib Arnab .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Arnab, A.A., Raj, S.M.R.H., Schormans, J., Mukta, S.J., Ahmad, N. (2021). Analysis of the Cost of Varying Levels of User Perceived Quality for Internet Access. In: Vasant, P., Zelinka, I., Weber, GW. (eds) Intelligent Computing and Optimization. ICO 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1324. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68154-8_36

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics