Institutional Perspectives on Frugal Innovation

Abstract

The target market for frugal innovations is predominantly the developing countries, where institutions that facilitate market and economic transactions are either weak or non-existent. Though the institutional conditions in developing countries are likely to affect frugal innovations significantly, this important aspect of innovation management is yet to receive research attention. To highlight this scholarly oversight, and address this unchartered territory, our chapter explores the institutional factors that influence the development and diffusion of frugal innovations. Using a systematic review of three well-known frugal innovation cases, this study explored the background and contexts of these innovations to extract the institutional factors by which they are characterised. The findings suggest that frugal innovations are influenced by eight major institutional factors: culture and tradition; legal and regulatory regimes; activism of non-governmental organisations; government arrangements and systems; informal relations and partnerships; market/trade arrangements and systems; media influence; and family relations. The extensive discussion section highlights the effects of these factors and their implications for frugal innovation management.

Appendix 1

1.1 Mitticool (22 Publications)

• 1. Bhat IA (2015) Jugaad innovation: a frugal and flexible approach to innovation for the 21st century. Afr J Sci, Technol, Innov Dev, 7(1):71–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2015.1006909

• 2. Fressoli M, Arond E, Abrol D, Smith A, Ely A, Dias R (2014) When grassroots innovation movements encounter mainstream institutions: implications for models of inclusive innovation. Innov Dev, 4(2):277–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930x.2014.921354

• 3. Fressoli M, Around E, Abrol D, Smith A, Ely A (2013) Grassroots innovation’s framings and their modes of engagement: implications for models of inclusive innovation, paper presented o the International Conference LALICS 2013, 11–12 November, 2013, Rio de Janeiro

• 4. Goyal P, Goyal A (2016) Jugaad innovation in Indian rural marketing: meaning and role. SCMS J Indian Manag 13:5–18

• 5. Gupta S (2019) Understanding the feasibility and value of grassroots innovation. J Acad Mark Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00639-9

• 6. Haldar S (2017) Green entrepreneurship in the changing market scenario in India. Retrieved 12 October 2019, from https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/54624432/EDII_ECOPRENEURSHIP.pdf?

• 7. Hossain M (2018a) Adoption of open innovation by small firms to develop frugal innovations for inclusive development. In: Vanhaverbeke W, Frattini F, Roijakkers N, Usman M (eds), Open Innovation in SMEs World Scientific

• 8. Joshi R (2015) The essence of lived experiences of grassroots innovators: a phenomenological study. (Doctor of Philosophy), The University of Technology Sydney Retrieved from https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/bitstream/10453/43358/2/02whole.pdf

• 9. Joshi RG (2015) Fostering Transformation through the moBilization of Grassroots Innovations; UNESCAP Regional Report; UN ESCAP: Bangkok, Thailand

• 10. Kalpana Sastry R, Tara O (2014). Rural innovations @ grassroots: mining the minds of the masses. Hyderabad, India: National Academy of Agricultural Research Management

• 11. Nair A, Tiwari R, Buse S (2017) Emerging patterns of grassroots innovations: results of a conceptual study based on selected cases from India. In: Herstatt C, Tiwari R (eds) Lead Market India. India Studies in Business and Economics: Springer

• 12. Pansera M (2012, 9–11 November 2012) Frugality, grassroots and inclusiveness: new challenges for mainstream innovation theories. Paper presented at the GLOBELICS International Conference Hangzhou, China

• 13. Pansera M (2012) Eco-innovation as a Development Tool: Evidence from Latin America and Asia. Retrieved 28 September 2019, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320323924_Eco-innovation_as_a_Development_Tool_Evidence_from_Latin_America_and_Asia/link/59ddec1f458515f6ef0e3260/download

• 14. Prahalad D (2013) design strategy for the bottom of the pyramid, pp 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36540-9_12

• 15. Prakash O, Mathur A (2013) Integrated and corporate learning in higher education: challenges and strategies. In: Narasimharao B, Kanchugarakoppal S, Fulzele U (eds) Evolving corporate education strategies for developing countries: the role of universities: IGI Global

• 16. Rego J, Corradi A (2018) ICH and ‘Frugal Innovation’: a contribution to development through the framework of the 2003 convention. Int J Intang Herit, 13:174–187.

• 17. Rego J, Corradi A (2018) ICH and ‘Frugal Innovation’: a contribution to development through the framework of the 2003 convention. Int J Intang Herit, 13:174–187.

• 18. Sarkar S (2018) Grassroots entrepreneurs and social change at the bottom of the pyramid: the role of bricolage. Entrep & RegNal Dev, 30(3–4):421–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2017.1413773

• 19. Singh SH, Maiyar LM, Bhowmick B (2019) Assessing the appropriate grassroots technological innovation for sustainable development. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, pp 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2019.1646420

• 20. Tuteja G, Kaushik A, Verma, A (2016) Rural entrepreneurs of India: redefining business realities by employing e-commerce technologies. VIMARSH – A Peer Reviewed Refereed Journal, 6(1):48–56

• 21. Wierenga M (2015) Local frugal innovations: how do resource-scarce innovations emerge in India? (Masters), Aalto University Retrieved 28 September 2019, from https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/bitstream/handle/123456789/18429/hse_ethesis_14103.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

• 22. Yadav V, Goyal P (2015) User innovation and entrepreneurship: case studies from rural India. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-015-0018-4

1.2 Jayaashree Industries (18 Publications)

• 1. Abhi S, Venugopal V, Shastri S (2015) Social entrepreneurship—building sustainability through business models and measurement of social impact, pp 295–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2086-2_13

• 2. Bhandare N (2019) Breaking new ground: films on menstruation shatter an old silence. Indian J Gend Stud, 26(1–2):196–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971521518808050

• 3. Damani B, Sardeshpande V (2015) Social change using innovation and technology. In: Majumdar S, Guha S, Marakkath N (eds) Technology and innovation for social change. Springer, New Delhi

• 4. Date G, Chandrasekharan S (2017) Beyond efficiency: engineering for sustainability requires solving for pattern. Engineering Studies, 10(1):12–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2017.1410160

• 5. Garikipati S, Boudot C (2017) To pad or not to pad: towards better sanitary care for women in indian slums. J Int Dev, 29(1):32–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3266

• 6. Gaurav P, Meta A, Ghandhi H, Mehrotra N, Tarun A (n.d.) Jayaashree Industries: making meaning to the society, case study for operations & supply chain management course. Retrieved 29 September 2019, from https://media-openideo-rwd.oiengine.com/attachments/8fc8cb53-6cc6-42b0-a346-1597a30abc07.pdf

• 7. Goyal V (2016) Scope and opportunities for menstrual health and hygiene products in India. Int Res J Soc Sci, 5(7):1–5

• 8. Gupta S (2018) Developing frugal, sustainable and inclusive solutions for cities (Masters), Polytechnic University of Milan

• 9. Gupta S (2019) Understanding the feasibility and value of grassroots innovation. J Acad Mark Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00639-9

• 10. Hossain M (2018a) Adoption of open innovation by small firms to develop frugal innovations for inclusive development. In: Vanhaverbeke W, Frattini F, Roijakkers N, Usman M (eds) Open Innovation in SMEs World Scientific

• 11. Kimiko A, Miki E (2019). “Padman”: a case of diffusion of innovations theory. J Cult Symbiosis Res, 13:17–20

• 12. Koh H, Hegde N, Das C (2016) Hardware pioneers: harnessing the impact potential of technology entrepreneurs: The Lemelson Foundation

• 13. OECD (2015) Innovation policies for inclusive development: scaling up inclusive innovations. OECD, Paris

• 14. Sahoo S, Panda A (2016) Arunachalam Muruganantham: the man who sparked a revolution agains all odds. Parikalpana: KIIT J Manag, 12(1):98–101

• 15. Sharma G, Kumar H (2019) Commercialising innovations from the informal economy. South Asian J Bus Stud, 8(1):40–61. https://doi.org/10.1108/sajbs-12-2017-0142

• 16. Tinsley E, Agapitova N (eds) (2018) Reachin the last mile: innovative business models for inclusive development Washington, DC: The World Bank

• 17. Venugopal V, Abhi S (2013) A new white revolution: case study of a social entrepreneur. South Asian J Manag, 20(4):144–152

• 18. Wierenga M (2015). Local frugal innovations: how do resource-scarce innovations emerge in India? (Masters), Aalto University Retrieved from https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/bitstream/handle/123456789/18429/hse_ethesis_14103.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

1.3 Toyola Cook Stove (13 Publications)

• 1. Agbemabiese L, Nkomo J, Sokona Y (2012) Enabling innovations in energy access: an African perspective. Energy Policy, 47:38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.051

• 2. Akolgo GA, Essandoh EO, Gyamfi S, Atta-Darkwa T, Kumi EN, Maia CMBdF (2018) The potential of a dual purpose improved cookstove for low income earners in Ghana—Improved cooking methods and biochar production. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 82:369–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.044

• 3. Ashden Awards (2011) Case study summary: Toyola energy limited Ghana. Retrieved from: https://www.cleancookingalliance.org/binary-data/RESOURCE/file/000/000/46-1.pdf

• 4. Bendul JC, Rosca E, Pivovarova D (2017) Sustainable supply chain models for base of the pyramid. J Clean Prod, 162:S107–S120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.001

• 5. ENERGICA (2009) Pre-feasibility study for an improved cook stoves project in Northern Ghana. Danish Energy Agency

• 6. Gabrane S (2013) Distribution channel capabilities of energy products at the bottom of the pyramid in Africa (Masters). Hasselt University. Retrieved 30 September 2019, from https://uhdspace.uhasselt.be/dspace/bitstream/1942/15550/1/11320952012834.pdf

• 7. Haselip J, Desgain D, Mackenzie G (2014) Financing energy SMEs in Ghana and Senegal: outcomes, barriers and prospects. Energy Policy, 65:369–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.013

• 8. Haselip J, Desgain D, Mackenzie G (2015) Non-financial constraints to scaling-up small and medium-sized energy enterprises: Findings from field research in Ghana, Senegal, Tanzania and Zambia. Energy Research & Social Science, 5:78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.12.016

• 9. Kayser O, Budinich V (2015) Cooking. In: Kayser O, Budinich V (eds) Scaling up business solutions to social problems: a practical guide for social and corporate entrepreneurs Palgrave Macmillan

• 10. Kayser O, Budinich V (2015) Marketing—from needs to wants. In: Kayser O, Budinich V (eds) Scaling up business solutions to social problems: a practical guide for social and corporate entrepreneurs Palgrave Macmillan

• 11. Osei R (2010) Toyola charcoal stove: improving the environmenet and health of the poor in Ghana. New York

• 12. Piedrahita R (2017) On the assessment of air pollution and behavior within a cookstove intervention study in Northern Ghana and development of improved measurement techniques. (Doctor of Philosophy), University of Colorado, Boulder. Retrieved from https://scholar.colorado.edu/mcen_gradetds/136 (136)

• 13. Rosca E, Arnold M, Bendul JC (2017) Business models for sustainable innovation—an empirical analysis of frugal products and services. J Clean Prod, 162:S133–S145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.050

• 14. Yankey V (2009) Country chapter: Ghana Regional Reports on Renewable Energies Eschborn