Skip to main content

Physiatric Evaluation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rehabilitation After Limb Salvage Surgery

Abstract

Physiatric evaluation is a crucial moment to plan and manage a rehabilitative intervention. At this stage, the rehabilitation therapist in charge of oncology patients is called to accurately evaluate the anatomical and functional damage caused by the tumor and the therapies used to treat it, as well as all implications restricting the patient’s activity and social participation. The therapist should also be able to outline a complete profile of the subject, so as to share a project that emphasizes their strengths and aims at improving their abilities and removing any environmental or personal factors that might be hindering their self-expression, thus promoting their social participation [1, 2] (see Tables 8.1 and 8.2).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bornman J. The World Health Organisation’s terminology and classification: application to severe disability. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26:182–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hemmingsson H, Jonsson H. An occupational perspective on the concept of participation in the international classification of functioning, disability and health—some critical remarks. Am J Occup Ther. 2005;59:569–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Prodinger B, et al. Toward the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) rehabilitation set: a minimal generic set of domains for rehabilitation as a health strategy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97:875–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Uehara K, et al. Reliability and validity of the musculoskeletal tumor society scoring system for the upper extremity in Japanese patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475:2253–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Frontera WR. DeLisa’s physical medicine and rehabilitation: principles and practice, two volume set. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel index: a simple index of independence useful in scoring improvement in the rehabilitation of the chronically ill. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kovar MG, Powell Lawton M. Functional disability: activities and instrumental activities of daily living. Annu Rev Gerontol Geriatr. 1994;14:57.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cheville AL, Basford JR, Troxel AB, Kornblith AB. Performance of common clinician- and self-report measures in assessing the function of community-dwelling people with metastatic breast cancer. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:2116–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. O’Toole DM, Golden AM. Evaluating cancer patients for rehabilitation potential. West J Med. 1991;155:384–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Beebe K, et al. Functional outcomes after limb salvage surgery and endoprosthetic reconstruction with an expandable prosthesis: a report of 4 cases. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:1039–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Teunis T, Nota SPFT, Hornicek FJ, Schwab JH, Lozano-Calderón SA. Outcome after reconstruction of the proximal humerus for tumor resection: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:2245–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Pakulis PJ, Young NL, Davis AM. Evaluating physical function in an adolescent bone tumor population. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2005;45:635–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ryan JL, et al. Mechanisms of cancer-related fatigue. Oncologist. 2007;12(Suppl 1):22–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. St BP, Kasper CE, Lindsey AM. Fatigue mechanisms in patients with cancer: effects of tumor necrosis factor and exercise on skeletal muscle. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1992;19:419–25.

    Google Scholar 

  15. NCCN—Evidence-based cancer guidelines, oncology drug compendium, Oncology Continuing Medical Education https://www.nccn.org/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valentina Gariboldi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gariboldi, V., Lopresti, M., Panella, L. (2021). Physiatric Evaluation. In: Lopresti, M., Panella, L. (eds) Rehabilitation After Limb Salvage Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66352-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66352-0_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-66351-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-66352-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics