Abstract
Physiatric evaluation is a crucial moment to plan and manage a rehabilitative intervention. At this stage, the rehabilitation therapist in charge of oncology patients is called to accurately evaluate the anatomical and functional damage caused by the tumor and the therapies used to treat it, as well as all implications restricting the patient’s activity and social participation. The therapist should also be able to outline a complete profile of the subject, so as to share a project that emphasizes their strengths and aims at improving their abilities and removing any environmental or personal factors that might be hindering their self-expression, thus promoting their social participation [1, 2] (see Tables 8.1 and 8.2).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bornman J. The World Health Organisation’s terminology and classification: application to severe disability. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26:182–8.
Hemmingsson H, Jonsson H. An occupational perspective on the concept of participation in the international classification of functioning, disability and health—some critical remarks. Am J Occup Ther. 2005;59:569–76.
Prodinger B, et al. Toward the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) rehabilitation set: a minimal generic set of domains for rehabilitation as a health strategy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97:875–84.
Uehara K, et al. Reliability and validity of the musculoskeletal tumor society scoring system for the upper extremity in Japanese patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475:2253–9.
Frontera WR. DeLisa’s physical medicine and rehabilitation: principles and practice, two volume set. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.
Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel index: a simple index of independence useful in scoring improvement in the rehabilitation of the chronically ill. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61–5.
Kovar MG, Powell Lawton M. Functional disability: activities and instrumental activities of daily living. Annu Rev Gerontol Geriatr. 1994;14:57.
Cheville AL, Basford JR, Troxel AB, Kornblith AB. Performance of common clinician- and self-report measures in assessing the function of community-dwelling people with metastatic breast cancer. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:2116–24.
O’Toole DM, Golden AM. Evaluating cancer patients for rehabilitation potential. West J Med. 1991;155:384–7.
Beebe K, et al. Functional outcomes after limb salvage surgery and endoprosthetic reconstruction with an expandable prosthesis: a report of 4 cases. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:1039–47.
Teunis T, Nota SPFT, Hornicek FJ, Schwab JH, Lozano-Calderón SA. Outcome after reconstruction of the proximal humerus for tumor resection: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:2245–53.
Pakulis PJ, Young NL, Davis AM. Evaluating physical function in an adolescent bone tumor population. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2005;45:635–43.
Ryan JL, et al. Mechanisms of cancer-related fatigue. Oncologist. 2007;12(Suppl 1):22–34.
St BP, Kasper CE, Lindsey AM. Fatigue mechanisms in patients with cancer: effects of tumor necrosis factor and exercise on skeletal muscle. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1992;19:419–25.
NCCN—Evidence-based cancer guidelines, oncology drug compendium, Oncology Continuing Medical Education https://www.nccn.org/.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gariboldi, V., Lopresti, M., Panella, L. (2021). Physiatric Evaluation. In: Lopresti, M., Panella, L. (eds) Rehabilitation After Limb Salvage Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66352-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66352-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-66351-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-66352-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)