Abstract
Many contemporary service-based systems follow the microservice approach, particularly in DevOps or continuous delivery contexts. They share a set of important tenets such as independent development and deployment, high releasability, polyglot technology support, and loose coupling. A number of best practices for microservice architectures have been codified as patterns, which embody those tenets. However, no real-world microservices system can support all patterns and practices well, but rather architectural decisions making trade-offs among them are needed. Conformance to the patterns and practices selected in such decisions is hard to ensure and assess automatically, especially in large-scale, complex, and evolving systems. In this work, we propose a model-based approach based on generic, technology-independent metrics, tied to typical architectural design decisions in the microservice domain. With this approach we can measure conformance to the patterns and related tenets. We demonstrate and assess the validity and appropriateness of these metrics in performing an assessment of a system’s conformance to patterns through statistical methods.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bogner, J., Wagner, S., Zimmermann, A.: Towards a practical maintainability quality model for service-and microservice-based systems, pp. 195–198 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3129790.3129816
Chen, L.: Microservices: architecting for continuous delivery and DevOps. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture (ICSA), pp. 39–397, April 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSA.2018.00013
Engel, T., Langermeier, M., Bauer, B., Hofmann, A.: Evaluation of microservice architectures: a metric and tool-based approach. In: Mendling, J., Mouratidis, H. (eds.) CAiSE 2018. LNBIP, vol. 317, pp. 74–89. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92901-9_8
Harrell, F.E.: Regression Modeling Strategies. SSS. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19425-7
Guo, G.Y., Atlee, J.M., Kazman, R.: A software architecture reconstruction method. In: Donohoe, P. (ed.) Software Architecture. ITIFIP, vol. 12, pp. 15–33. Springer, Boston, MA (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35563-4_2
Haselböck, S., Weinreich, R., Buchgeher, G.: Decision models for microservices: design areas, stakeholders, use cases, and requirements. In: Lopes, A., de Lemos, R. (eds.) ECSA 2017. LNCS, vol. 10475, pp. 155–170. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65831-5_11
Hohpe, G., Woolf, B.: Enterprise Integration Patterns. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2003)
Knoche, H., Hasselbring, W.: Drivers and barriers for microservice adoption - a survey among professionals in Germany. Enterp. Model. Inf. Syst. Archit. (EMISAJ) Int. J. Conceptual Model. 14(1), 1–35 (2019). https://doi.org/10.18417/emisa.14.1
Lewis, J., Fowler, M.: Microservices: a definition of this new architectural term, March 2004. http://martinfowler.com/articles/microservices.html
Newman, S.: Building Microservices: Designing Fine-Grained Systems. O’Reilly, Sebastopol (2015)
Pahl, C., Jamshidi, P.: Microservices: a systematic mapping study. In: 6th International Conference on Cloud Computing and Services Science, pp. 137–146 (2016)
Pautasso, C., Wilde, E.: Why is the web loosely coupled?: a multi-faceted metric for service design. In: 18th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 911–920. ACM (2009)
Pietrantuono, R., Russo, S., Guerriero, A.: Run-time reliability estimation of microservice architectures. In: 2018 IEEE 29th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering (ISSRE), pp. 25–35, October 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSRE.2018.00014
Richardson, C.: A pattern language for microservices (2017). http://microservices.io/patterns/index.html
Skowronski, J.: Best practices for event-driven microservice architecture (2019). https://hackernoon.com/best- practices-for-event-driven-microservice-architecture-e034p21lk
Taibi, D., Lenarduzzi, V.: On the definition of microservice bad smells. IEEE Softw. 35(3), 56–62 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2018.2141031
Van Deursen, A., Hofmeister, C., Koschke, R., Moonen, L., Riva, C.: Symphony: view-driven software architecture reconstruction. In: 4th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA 2004), pp. 122–132. IEEE (2004)
Zdun, U., Navarro, E., Leymann, F.: Ensuring and assessing architecture conformance to microservice decomposition patterns. In: Maximilien, M., Vallecillo, A., Wang, J., Oriol, M. (eds.) ICSOC 2017. LNCS, vol. 10601, pp. 411–429. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69035-3_29
Zimmermann, O.: Microservices tenets. Comput. Sci. Res. Dev. 301–310 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00450-016-0337-0
Zimmermann, O., Stocker, M., Zdun, U., Luebke, D., Pautasso, C.: Microservice API patterns (2019). https://microservice-api-patterns.org
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by: FFG (Austrian Research Promotion Agency) project DECO, no. 846707; FWF (Austrian Science Fund) project API-ACE: I 4268.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ntentos, E., Zdun, U., Plakidas, K., Meixner, S., Geiger, S. (2020). Metrics for Assessing Architecture Conformance to Microservice Architecture Patterns and Practices. In: Kafeza, E., Benatallah, B., Martinelli, F., Hacid, H., Bouguettaya, A., Motahari, H. (eds) Service-Oriented Computing. ICSOC 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12571. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65310-1_42
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65310-1_42
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-65309-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-65310-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)