Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Design Decisions and Their Implications: An Ontology Quality Perspective

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Perspectives in Business Informatics Research (BIR 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 398))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 806 Accesses

Abstract

Objective, reproducible and quantifiable measurements based on well-defined metrics are a widespread instrument for quality assurance in engineering disciplines and also in ontology engineering. Ontology metrics allow for the assessment of their quality and the comparison of different versions of the same ontology. We argue that such a comparison and especially the view on the evolutional evolvement bears valuable insights on the effect of explicit and implicit design decisions. This paper examines the use of quality metrics in the evolution of an ontology that is used in an image recognition context in the fashion domain. Overall, 51 incremental versions were analyzed using the OntoMetrics framework by Rostock University. Using 13 selected criteria, the evolution of the ontology is quantified and the effect of design decisions on the analyzed criteria is outlined. The critical assessment of ontology metrics is further used to uncover weak spots in the ontology. These weak spots enabled the deriving of improvement recommendations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The ontology items are named exactly like in the ontology and are therefore not grammatically correct in the context of the given sentences.

References

  1. Lantow, B.: OntoMetrics: putting metrics into use for ontology evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. Porto, Portugal, 9 November 2016–11 November 2016, pp. 186–191. SCITEPRESS, [S. l.] (2016). https://doi.org/10.5220/0006084601860191

  2. Checco, A., et al.: FashionBrain project: a vision for understanding Europe’s fashion data universe. http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.09788v1 (2017)

  3. Lourdusamy, R., John, A.: A review on metrics for ontology evaluation. In: 2018 2nd International Conference on Inventive Systems and Control (ICISC). 2018 2nd International Conference on Inventive Systems and Control (ICISC), Coimbatore, 19 January 2018–20 January 2018, pp. 1415–1421. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vrandečić, D., Sure, Y.: How to design better ontology metrics. In: Franconi, E., Kifer, M., May, W. (eds.) ESWC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4519, pp. 311–325. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72667-8_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Djedidi, R., Aufaure, M.-A.: ONTO-EVO AL an ontology evolution approach guided by pattern modeling and quality evaluation. In: Link, S., Prade, H. (eds.) FoIKS 2010. LNCS, vol. 5956, pp. 286–305. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11829-6_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Lantow, B., Sandkuhl, K.: An analysis of applicability using quality metrics for ontologies on ontology design patterns. Intell. Syst. Account. Finance Manage. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/isaf.1360

  7. Tartir, S., Arpinar, B., Moore, M., Sheth, A.P., Aleman-Meza, B.: OntoQA: metric-based ontology quality analysis. In: IEEE Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition from Distributed, Autonomous, Semantically Heterogeneous Data and Knowledge Sources, Houston, 27 November 2005 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gangemi, A., Catena, C., Ciaramita, M., Lehmann, J.: A theoretical framework for ontology evaluation and validation. In: Bouquet, P., Tummarello, G. (eds.) Semantic Web Applications and Perspectives. SWAP 2005, Italy, 14 December 2005–16 December 2005. CEUR (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Baader, F., Horrocks, I., Lutz, C., Sattler, U. (eds.): An Introduction to Description Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Baader, F., Horrocks, I., Lutz, C., Sattler, U.: Description logic terminology. In: Baader, F., Horrocks, I., Lutz, C., Sattler, U. (eds.) An Introduction to Description Logic, pp. 228–233. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2017)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Allemang, D., Hendler, J.: Counting and sets in OWL. In: Allemang, D., Hendler, J.A. (eds.) Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist. Modeling in RDF, RDFS and OWL, 2nd edn., pp. 249–278. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers/Elsevier, Amsterdam, Boston (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Antoniou, G., van Harmelen, F.: A semantic Web primer, 2nd edn. Cooperative information systems. MIT, Cambridge, Mass., London (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. McDaniel, M., Storey, V.C.: Domain modeling for the semantic web: assessing the pragmatics of ontologies. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings 1979 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Duque-Ramos, A., Fernandez-Breis, J.T., Stevens, R., Aussenac-Gilles, N.: OQuaRE: a SQuaRE-based approach for evaluating the quality of ontologies. J. Res. Pract. Inf. Technol. 43, 159 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Maedche, A., Staab, S.: Measuring similarity between ontologies. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Benjamins, V.R. (eds.) EKAW 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2473, pp. 251–263. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45810-7_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Brank, J., Grobelnik, M., Mladenić, D.: A survey of ontology evaluation techniques. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Data Mining and Data Warehouses (SIGKDD 2005) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. McDaniel, M., Storey, V.C., Sugumaran, V.: Assessing the quality of domain ontologies: metrics and an automated ranking system. Data Knowl. Eng. 115, 32–47 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cardoso, S.D., et al.: Leveraging the impact of ontology evolution on semantic annotations. In: Blomqvist, E., Ciancarini, P., Poggi, F., Vitali, F. (eds.) EKAW 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10024, pp. 68–82. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49004-5_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Hammar, K.: Content Ontology Design Patterns: Qualities, Methods, and Tools, vol. 1879. Linköping University Electronic Press, Linköping (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rostock University, 18051, Rostock, Germany

    Achim Reiz & Kurt Sandkuhl

Authors
  1. Achim Reiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kurt Sandkuhl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kurt Sandkuhl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj Napoca, Romania

    Robert Andrei Buchmann

  2. University of Camerino, Camerino, Italy

    Andrea Polini

  3. Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

    Björn Johansson

  4. University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    Dimitris Karagiannis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Reiz, A., Sandkuhl, K. (2020). Design Decisions and Their Implications: An Ontology Quality Perspective. In: Buchmann, R.A., Polini, A., Johansson, B., Karagiannis, D. (eds) Perspectives in Business Informatics Research. BIR 2020. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 398. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61140-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61140-8_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-61139-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-61140-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation