Abstract
This paper explores the difference in the effects of role-playing and usability testing on the design thinking process of novice designers. While usability testing helps in understanding user mental models by observing user behavior as the user interacts with a system, role-playing relies on a designer’s own perception about the user where the designer him/herself acts as a user. The difference in user research methods that leads to a different understanding of the user might reflect in the design thinking process of a designer while ideating for solutions of an HCI design problem. This paper presents findings from an experimental study done with novice designers to understand the differences in design thinking processes when designers themselves conducted usability tests versus when they designed using role-playing on persona data given to them. The findings suggest that direct observation of user behavior leads to more consideration for users and therefore better user-centered thinking process than the imaginative role-playing.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Vredenburg, K., Isensee, S., Righi, C.: User-centered Design: An Integrated Approach. Prentice Hall, Prentice Hall (2002)
Dorst, K., Cross, N.: Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution. Des. Stud. 22, 425–437 (2001)
Norman, D.: The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition. Hachette UK, London (2013)
Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington (1994)
ISO 9241-11: 1998: Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (vdts) — Part 11: Guidance on usability. ISO (1998)
Murillo, B., Vargas, S., Moquillaza, A., Fernández, L., Paz, F.: Usability testing as a complement of heuristic evaluation: a case study. In: Marcus, A., Wang, W. (eds.) DUXU 2017. LNCS, vol. 10288, pp. 434–444. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58634-2_32
Paz, F., Pow-Sang, J.A.: Current trends in usability evaluation methods: a systematic review. In: 2014 7th International Conference on Advanced Software Engineering and Its Applications, Haikou, pp. 11–15 (2014)
Nielsen, J.: Usability 101: introduction to usability. Usability 101: Introduction to Usability (2012)
Holzinger, A.: Usability engineering methods for software developers. Commun. ACM 48(1), 71–74 (2005)
Cardoso, C., Badke‐Schaub, P.E.T.R.A.: Fixation or inspiration: creative problem solving in design. J. Creative Behav. 45(2), 77–82 (2011)
Dahiya, A., Kumar, J.: Do design outcomes get influenced by type of user data? An experimental study with primary and secondary user research data. In: Ahram, T., Karwowski, W., Taiar, R. (eds.) IHSED 2018. AISC, vol. 876, pp. 191–197. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02053-8_30
Dahiya, A., Kumar, J.: Observations on design thinking in novice designers while empathizing with persona. In: Handbook of Research on Human-Computer Interfaces and New Modes of Interactivity, pp. 21–39. IGI Global (2019)
Goldschmidt, G.: Linkography (2014)
Kan, J.W.T., Bilda, Z., Gero, J.S.: Comparing entropy measures of idea links in design protocols: Linkography entropy measurement and analysis of differently conditioned design sessions. Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf. 21, 367–377 (2007)
Pourmohamadi, M., Gero, J.S.: LINKOgrapher: an analysis tool to study design protocols based on FBS coding scheme. In: DS 68-2: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 2011), Impacting Society through Engineering Design, vol. 2: Design Theory and Research Methodology, Lyngby/Copenhagen, Denmark (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dahiya, A., Kumar, J. (2020). Direct User Behavior Data Leads to Better User Centric Thinking than Role Playing: An Experimental Study on HCI Design Thinking. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S. (eds) HCI International 2020 – Late Breaking Posters. HCII 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1293. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60700-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60700-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60699-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60700-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)