Skip to main content

Improving Reliability of Clinical Models Using Prediction Calibration

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Uncertainty for Safe Utilization of Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, and Graphs in Biomedical Image Analysis (UNSURE 2020, GRAIL 2020)

Abstract

The wide-spread adoption of representation learning technologies in clinical decision making strongly emphasizes the need for characterizing model reliability and enabling rigorous introspection of model behavior. In supervised and semi-supervised learning, prediction calibration has emerged as a key technique to achieve improved generalization and to promote trust in learned models. In this paper, we investigate the effectiveness of different prediction calibration techniques in improving the reliability of clinical models. First, we introduce reliability plots, which measures the trade-off between model autonomy and generalization, to quantify model reliability. Second, we propose to utilize an interval calibration objective in lieu of the standard cross entropy loss to build classification models. Finally, using a lesion classification problem with dermoscopy images, we evaluate the proposed prediction calibration approach against both uncalibrated models as well as existing prediction calibration techniques such as mixup and single-shot calibration.

J.J. Thiagarajan—This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cabitza, F., Campagner, A.: Who wants accurate models? arguing for a different metrics to take classification models seriously. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.09246 (2019)

  2. Ching, T., et al.: Opportunities and obstacles for deep learning in biology and medicine. J. R. Soc. Interface 15(141), 20170387 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Codella, N., et al.: Skin lesion analysis toward melanoma detection 2018: a challenge hosted by the international skin imaging collaboration (ISIC). arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.03368 (2019)

  4. Faust, O., Hagiwara, Y., Hong, T.J., Lih, O.S., Acharya, U.R.: Deep learning for healthcare applications based on physiological signals: a review. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 161, 1–13 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gal, Y.: Uncertainty in deep learning. University of Cambridge, vol. 1, p. 3 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gal, Y., Ghahramani, Z.: Dropout as a Bayesian approximation: representing model uncertainty in deep learning. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 1050–1059 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ghahramani, Z.: Probabilistic machine learning and artificial intelligence. Nature 521(7553), 452–459 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Guo, C., Pleiss, G., Sun, Y., Weinberger, K.Q.: On calibration of modern neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, vol. 70, pp. 1321–1330. JMLR. org (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Heskes, T.: Practical confidence and prediction intervals. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 176–182 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kendall, A., Gal, Y.: What uncertainties do we need in Bayesian deep learning for computer vision? In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 5574–5584 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kononenko, I.: Machine learning for medical diagnosis: history, state of the art and perspective. Artif. Intell. Med. 23(1), 89–109 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuleshov, V., Fenner, N., Ermon, S.: Accurate uncertainties for deep learning using calibrated regression. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.00263 (2018)

  13. Kuleshov, V., Liang, P.S.: Calibrated structured prediction. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 3474–3482 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kumar, A., Sattigeri, P., Balakrishnan, A.: Variational inference of disentangled latent concepts from unlabeled observations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.00848 (2017)

  15. Lakshminarayanan, B., Pritzel, A., Blundell, C.: Simple and scalable predictive uncertainty estimation using deep ensembles. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 6402–6413 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Leibig, C., Allken, V., Ayhan, M.S., Berens, P., Wahl, S.: Leveraging uncertainty information from deep neural networks for disease detection. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 1–14 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Miotto, R., Wang, F., Wang, S., Jiang, X., Dudley, J.T.: Deep learning for healthcare: review, opportunities and challenges. Brief. Bioinform. 19(6), 1236–1246 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Seo, S., Seo, P.H., Han, B.: Learning for single-shot confidence calibration in deep neural networks through stochastic inferences. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 9030–9038 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Smith, R.C.: Uncertainty quantification: theory, implementation, and applications, vol. 12. SIAM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Thiagarajan, J.J., Kim, I., Anirudh, R., Bremer, P.T.: Understanding deep neural networks through input uncertainties. In: ICASSP 2019–2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 2812–2816. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Thiagarajan, J.J., Venkatesh, B., Sattigeri, P., Bremer, P.T.: Building calibrated deep models via uncertainty matching with auxiliary interval predictors. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Thulasidasan, S., Chennupati, G., Bilmes, J.A., Bhattacharya, T., Michalak, S.: On mixup training: improved calibration and predictive uncertainty for deep neural networks. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 13888–13899 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tonekaboni, S., Joshi, S., McCradden, M.D., Goldenberg, A.: What clinicians want: contextualizing explainable machine learning for clinical end use. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.05134 (2019)

  24. Tschandl, P., Rosendahl, C., Kittler, H.: The ham10000 dataset, a large collection of multi-source dermatoscopic images of common pigmented skin lesions. Sci. Data 5, 180161 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang, H., Cisse, M., Dauphin, Y.N., Lopez-Paz, D.: mixup: Beyond empirical risk minimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.09412 (2017)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Thiagarajan, J.J., Venkatesh, B., Rajan, D., Sattigeri, P. (2020). Improving Reliability of Clinical Models Using Prediction Calibration. In: Sudre, C.H., et al. Uncertainty for Safe Utilization of Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, and Graphs in Biomedical Image Analysis. UNSURE GRAIL 2020 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12443. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60365-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60365-6_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60364-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60365-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics