Abstract
Microservices are the go-to architectural style for building applications that are polyglot, support high scalability, independent development and deployment, and are rapidly adaptable to changes. Among the core tenets for a successful microservice architecture is high independence of the individual microservices, i.e. loose coupling. A number of patterns and best practices are well-established in the literature, but most actual microservice-based systems do not, as a whole or in part, conform to them. Assessing this conformance manually is not realistically possible for large-scale systems. This study aims to provide the foundations for an automated approach for assessing conformance to coupling-related patterns and practices specific for microservice architectures. We propose a model-based assessment based on generic, technology-independent metrics, connected to typical design decisions encountered in microservice architectures. We demonstrate and assess the validity and appropriateness of these metrics by performing an assessment of the conformance of real-world systems to patterns through statistical methods.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allen, E.B., Gottipati, S., Govindarajan, R.: Measuring size, complexity, and coupling of hypergraph abstractions of software: an information-theory approach. Softw. Qual. J. (2), 179–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-006-9010-3
Allen, E.B., Gottipati, S., Govindarajan, R.: Measuring size, complexity, and coupling of hypergraph abstractions of software: an information-theory approach. Softw. Qual. J. 15, 179–212 (2006)
Bansiya, J., Davis, C.G.: A hierarchical model for object-oriented design quality assessment. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 28(1), 4–17 (2002)
Basili, V.R., Briand, L.C., Melo, W.L.: A validation of object-oriented design metrics as quality indicators. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 22(10), 751–761 (1996)
Bogner, J., Wagner, S., Zimmermann, A.: Towards a practical maintainability quality model for service-and microservice-based systems, pp. 195–198, September 2017
Chidamber, S.R., Kemerer, C.F.: A metrics suite for object oriented design. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 20(6), 476–493 (1994)
Corbin, J., Strauss, A.L.: Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual. Sociol. 13, 3–20 (1990)
Frank, E., Harrell, J.: Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic and Ordinal Regression, and Survival Analysis, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Garousi, V., Felderer, M., Mäntylä, M.V.: Guidelines for including the grey literature and conducting multivocal literature reviews in software engineering. CoRR
Goldstein, M., Moshkovich, D.: Improving software through automatic untangling of cyclic dependencies. In: Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2014)
Harrison, R., Counsell, S.J., Nithi, R.V.: An evaluation of the mood set of object-oriented software metrics. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 24(6), 491–496 (1998)
Haselböck, S., Weinreich, R., Buchgeher, G.: Decision models for microservices: design areas, stakeholders, use cases, and requirements. In: Lopes, A., de Lemos, R. (eds.) ECSA 2017. LNCS, vol. 10475, pp. 155–170. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65831-5_11
Hohpe, G., Woolf, B.: Enterprise Integration Patterns. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2003)
Lewis, J., Fowler, M.: Microservices: a definition of this new architectural term, March 2004. http://martinfowler.com/articles/microservices.html
Newman, S.: Building Microservices: Designing Fine-Grained Systems. O’Reilly, Sebastapol (2015)
Pahl, C., Jamshidi, P.: Microservices: a systematic mapping study. In: 6th International Conference on Cloud Computing and Services Science, pp. 137–146 (2016)
Pautasso, C., Wilde, E.: Why is the web loosely coupled?: a multi-faceted metric for service design. In: 18th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 911–920. ACM (2009)
Richardson, C.: A pattern language for microservices (2017). http://microservices.io/patterns/index.html
Skowronski, J.: Best practices for event-driven microservice architecture (2019). https://hackernoon.com/best-practices-for-event-driven-microservice-architecture-e034p21lk
Taibi, D., Lenarduzzi, V.: On the definition of microservice bad smells. IEEE Softw. 35(3), 56–62 (2018)
Zdun, U., Navarro, E., Leymann, F.: Ensuring and assessing architecture conformance to microservice decomposition patterns. In: Maximilien, M., Vallecillo, A., Wang, J., Oriol, M. (eds.) ICSOC 2017. LNCS, vol. 10601, pp. 411–429. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69035-3_29
Zimmermann, O.: Microservices tenets. Comput. Sci. - Res. Dev., 301–310 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00450-016-0337-0
Zimmermann, O., Stocker, M., Zdun, U., Luebke, D., Pautasso, C.: Microservice API patterns (2019). https://microservice-api-patterns.org
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by: FFG (Austrian Research Promotion Agency) project DECO, no. 846707; FWF (Austrian Science Fund) project API-ACE: I 4268.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ntentos, E., Zdun, U., Plakidas, K., Meixner, S., Geiger, S. (2020). Assessing Architecture Conformance to Coupling-Related Patterns and Practices in Microservices. In: Jansen, A., Malavolta, I., Muccini, H., Ozkaya, I., Zimmermann, O. (eds) Software Architecture. ECSA 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12292. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58923-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58923-3_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-58922-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-58923-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)