Skip to main content

Failure Mode Reasoning in Model Based Safety Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Model-Based Safety and Assessment (IMBSA 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 12297))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Failure Mode Reasoning (FMR) is a novel approach for analyzing failure in a Safety Instrumented System (SIS). The method uses an automatic analysis of an SIS program to calculate potential failures in parts of the SIS. In this paper we use a case study from the power industry to demonstrate how FMR can be utilized in conjunction with other model-based safety analysis methods, such as HiP-HOPS and CFT, in order to achieve a comprehensive safety analysis of SIS. In this case study, FMR covers the analysis of SIS inputs while HiP-HOPS/CFT models the faults of logic solver and final elements. The SIS program is analyzed by FMR and the results are exported to HiP-HOPS/CFT via automated interfaces. The final outcome is the collective list of SIS failure modes along with their reliability measures. We present and review the results from both qualitative and quantitative perspectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    \(1\; FIT= 1\;in\; 10^9\,h\).

  2. 2.

    Equation 4 is commonly referred to as Esary-Proschan method and is used by FTA tools such as FaultTree+, Arbor and Item. See [1] for derivation of underlying concepts.

References

  1. Henley, E.J., Kumamoto, H.: Probabilistic Risk Assessment and Management for Engineers and Scientists, 2nd edn. IEEE Press, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  2. IEC: IEC 61025: fault tree analysis (FTA) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. IEC: IEC 61508: Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety related systems - part 6: guidelines on the application of IEC 61508–2 and IEC 61508–3 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. IEC: Programmable controllers - Part 3: programming languages (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. IEC: Functional safety-safety instrumented systems for the process industry sector - Part 1: framework, definitions, system, hardware and application programming requirements (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. ISA: ISA-TR84.00.02-2015, Safety integrity level (SIL) verification of safety instrumented functions (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jahanian, H.: Generalizing PFD formulas of IEC 61508 for KooN configurations. ISA Trans. 55, 168–174 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jahanian, H.: Failure mode reasoning. In: 2019 4th International Conference on System Reliability and Safety (ICSRS), pp. 295–303. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kaiser, B., Liggesmeyer, P., Mäckel, O.: A new component concept for fault trees. In: Proceedings of the 8th Australian workshop on Safety Critical Systems and Software-Volume 33, pp. 37–46. Australian Computer Society, Inc. (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kaiser, B., et al.: Advances in component fault trees. In: Proceedings of ESREL (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Papadopoulos, Y., McDermid, J., Sasse, R., Heiner, G.: Analysis and synthesis of the behaviour of complex programmable electronic systems in conditions of failure. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 71(3), 229–247 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Papadopoulos, Y., et al.: A synthesis of logic and bio-inspired techniques in the design of dependable systems. Annu. Rev. Control 41, 170–182 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Parker, D., Walker, M., Papadopoulos, Y.: Model-based functional safety analysis and architecture optimisation, pp. 79–92. IGI Global (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rausand, M.: Reliability of Safety-Critical Systems. Wiley, Hoboken (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Stecher, K.: Fault tree analysis, taking into account causes of common mode failures. Siemens Forsch. Entwicklungsberichte (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stecher, K.: Evaluation of large fault-trees with repeated events using an efficient bottom-up algorithm. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 35(1), 51–58 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vesely, W.E., Goldberg, F.F., Roberts, N.H., Haasl, D.F.: Fault Tree Handbook (NUREG-0492). US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1981)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamid Jahanian .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jahanian, H., Parker, D., Zeller, M., McIver, A., Papadopoulos, Y. (2020). Failure Mode Reasoning in Model Based Safety Analysis. In: Zeller, M., Höfig, K. (eds) Model-Based Safety and Assessment. IMBSA 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12297. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58920-2_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58920-2_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-58919-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-58920-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics