Abstract
Reliability-centered maintenance for production assets is a well-established concept for the most effective and efficient disposition of maintenance resources. Unfortunately, the approach takes a lot of effort and relies heavily on the knowledge of individuals. Reliability data in Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS) is scarce and almost never used well. An automated risk assessment system would have the potential to contribute to the dissemination and effective use of risk information and analysis. The individuality of production setting, however, prevents current systems from being practically relevant for most industries. The presented approach combines ontologies to store and link knowledge, an information logistics model displaying the various information streams, and the Internet of production to take the different user systems and infrastructure layers into account. The provided model of a reference digital shadow for risk information and a detailed information logistics model will help software companies to improve reliability software, standardize and enable assets owners to establish a customized digital shadow for their production networks.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Wireman, T.: Benchmarking Best Practices in Maintenance, Reliability and Asset Management: Updated for ISO 55000, 3rd edn. Industrial Press, South Norwalk (2015)
Nowlan, F.S., Heap, H.: Reliability-Centred Maintenance. Technical Information Service, US Department of Commerce, San Francisco (1978)
Bloom, N.B.: Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM). McGraw-Hill Professional Publishing, Blacklick (2005)
Ni, H., Chen, A., Chen, N.: Some extensions on risk matrix approach. Saf. Sci. 48(10), 1269–1278 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2010.04.005
Pollanz, M.: Konzeptionelle Überlegungen zur Einrichtung und Prüfung eines Risikomanagementsystems: droht eine Mega-Erwartungslücke? Der Betrieb(52), 393–399 (1999)
Leidinger, B.: Wertorientierte Instandhaltung_ Kosten senken, Verfügbarkeit erhalten-Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden (2017), Wertorientierte Instandhaltung: Kosten senken, Verfügbarkeit erhalten. Springer, Wiesbaden (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04401-5
Al-Najjar, B.: A model to diagnose the deviation in the maintenance performance measures. In: Mathew, J. (ed.) Engineering Assessment Management: Proceedings of the 1st World Congress on Engineering Asset Management (WCEAM) 2006 Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia, 11–14 July 2006, vol. 23, pp. 87–93 Springer, London (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-814-2_8
Porter, M.E.: Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance; with a New Introduction. Free Press, New York (1998)
Allee, V.: Reconfiguring the value network. J. Bus. Strategy 21(4), 36–39 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1108/eb040103
British Standards Institution: Asset management: Part 1: Specification for the optimized management of physical assets 03.100.01(55-1) (2008). http://www.irantpm.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/pass55-2008.pdf. Accessed 17 Dec 2019
Tupa, J., Simota, J., Steiner, F.: Aspects of risk management implementation for industry 4.0. Procedia Manuf. 11, 1223–1230 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.248
Geldermann, J., Merz, M., Bertsch, V., et al.: The reference installation approach for the estimation of industrial assets at risk. EJIE 2(1), 73 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIE.2008.016330
Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2), 263–291 (1979)
Green, C.H., Parker, D.J., Tunstall, S.: Assessment of flood control and management options: WCD Thematic Review (2000)
Baybutt, P.: Using risk tolerance criteria to determine safety integrity levels for safety instrumented functions. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 25(6), 1000–1009 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2012.05.016
Gleißner, W.: Quantifizierung komplexer Risiken – Fallbeispiel Projektrisiken. Risiko-Manager (22), 7–10 (2014)
Eruguz, A.S., Tan, T., van Houtum, G.-J.: A survey of maintenance and service logistics management: classification and research agenda from a maritime sector perspective. Comput. Oper. Res. 85, 184–205 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2017.03.003
Murè, S., Demichela, M.: Fuzzy Application Procedure (FAP) for the risk assessment of occupational accidents. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 22(5), 593–599 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2009.05.007
Romeike, F.: Risikomanagement. Studienwissen kompakt. Springer, Wiesbaden (2018)
Oleinik, A.: What are neural networks not good at? On artificial creativity. Big Data Soc. 6(1), 205395171983943 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719839433
Popov, G., Lyon, B.K., Hollcroft, B. (eds.): Risk Assessment: A Practical Guide to Assessing Operational Risks. Wiley, Hoboken (2016)
König, R.: Management betrieblicher Risiken bei produzierenden Unternehmen. Dissertation, Rheinisch-Westfälischen Technischen Hochschule, Aachen (2008)
Carpitella, S., Certa, A., Izquierdo, J., et al.: A combined multi-criteria approach to support FMECA analyses: a real-world case. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 169, 394–402 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.09.017
Filho, S.Á., et al.: Management tool for reliability analysis in socio-technical systems - a case study. In: Boring, R.L. (ed.) AHFE 2019. AISC, vol. 956, pp. 13–25. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20037-4_2
Cem Kuzu, A., Akyuz, E., Arslan, O.: Application of Fuzzy Fault Tree Analysis (FFTA) to maritime industry: a risk analysing of ship mooring operation. Ocean Eng. 179, 128–134 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.03.029
Resteanu, C., Vaduva, I., Andreica, M.: Monte Carlo simulation for reliability centered maintenance management. In: Lirkov, I., Margenov, S., Waśniewski, J. (eds.) LSSC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4818, pp. 148–156. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78827-0_15
Si, S.-L., You, X.-Y., Liu, H.-C. et al.: DEMATEL technique: a systematic review of the state-of-the-art literature on methodologies and applications. Math. Probl. Eng. 2018(1), 1–33 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3696457
Garg, A., Deshmukh, S.G.: Maintenance management: literature review and directions. J. Qual. Maint. Eng 12(3), 205–238 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1108/13552510610685075
Karl, F.: Bedarfsermittlung und Planung von Rekonfigurationen an Betriebsmitteln. Zugl.: München, Techn. Univ., Diss., 2014. Forschungsberichte IWB/ Institut für Werkzeugmaschinen und Betriebswissenschaften, Technische Universität München, vol. 298, Utz, München (2015)
Stuckenschmidt, H.: Ontologien: Konzepte, Technologien und Anwendungen, 2. Aufl. Informatik im Fokus. Springer, Berlin (2011)
Krcmar, H.: Einführung in das Informationsmanagement, 2., überarb. Aufl. Springer Gabler, Berlin (2015)
Milvich, M.: Ein Semantisches Web für die Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg. Masterthesis, Fachhochschule Karlsruhe (2005)
Nienke, S.: Ontologie für Energieinformationssysteme produzierender Unternehmen. Dissertation, 1. Auflage. Edition Wissenschaft Apprimus, Band 156. Apprimus Verlag, Aachen (2018)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Defèr, F., Schuh, G., Stich, V. (2020). Towards a Unified Reliability-Centered Information Logistics Model for Production Assets. In: Lalic, B., Majstorovic, V., Marjanovic, U., von Cieminski, G., Romero, D. (eds) Advances in Production Management Systems. The Path to Digital Transformation and Innovation of Production Management Systems. APMS 2020. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 591. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57993-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57993-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57992-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57993-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)
